header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Feb 2014
Newsome R Reddington M Breakwell L Chiverton N Cole A Michael A Boote J Dimairo M
Full Access

Purpose of study and background

The primary aim of the study was to test the feasibility of conducting a full RCT with economic analysis and help to inform the provision of physiotherapy in a specific sub-group of patients with sciatica

Methods

60 patients waiting for primary, unilateral, single level, lumbar micro-discectomy surgery were recruited and randomised into two groups. The intervention group received a new spinal physiotherapy regimen. Primary outcome measure was the number of patients who did not require surgery at the time of consent clinic. Secondary measures were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EQ5DL, taken at recruitment, 1 week before surgery and 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Feb 2014
Newsome R Reddington M Boote J Breakwell L Chiverton N Michael A Cole A Dimairo M
Full Access

Objectives

To investigate the views and experiences of patients with sciatica who have undergone a bespoke physiotherapy programme whilst awaiting primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

Methods

This is a qualitative study, nested within a preliminary RCT. All patients were listed for primary, single-level microdiscectomy surgery. In the experimental arm of the study 29 patients had up to 6 sessions of physiotherapy over an 8 week period while on the waiting list for lumbar microdiscectomy. After surgery, they were invited to participate in an in-depth semi-structured interview. At this time patients had either decided not to have the surgery, or had undergone surgery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed. Two researchers were involved in the analysis of the data to ensure the interpretation of the findings was robust, credible and trustworhy.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 60 - 60
1 Jun 2012
Newsome R Reddington M Breakwell L Chiverton N Cole A Michael A
Full Access

Purpose

To question the reliability of Thoracic Spine pain as a red flag and symptoms of a possible cause of Serious Spinal Pathology (SSP).

Methods

The clinical notes and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results of patients presenting to the Sheffield Spinal Service with Thoracic spine symptoms but no signs were retrospectively reviewed over the period of 2 year (September 2008-August 2010).

The clinical reason for request of Thoracic MRIs were noted and the patient notes were reviewed to determine their presentation, length of time of symptoms, age and also it was noted whether any other recognized red flag symptoms were present. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients referred with known SSP or myelopathic symptoms.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 84 - 84
1 Jun 2012
Newsome R Reddington M Breakwell L Chiverton N Cole A Michael A
Full Access

Purpose

To evaluate the competencies of spinal extended scope physiotherapists (ESP) following the introduction of requesting rights for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) one year later.

Methods

From September 2009 to August 2010 each MRI scan requested by the 2 spinal ESPs within the orthopaedic clinic was recorded along with their clinical diagnosis to ascertain why the scan was requested. This was indicated on a four point scale of likelihood of pathology which had been introduced to give evidence for MRI requesting rights. This was then audited to determine the total number of scans requested along with the accuracy or justification of the request.