48 patients (52 hips), with osteoarthritis, participated in a 5 year RSA study. Each patient received a VEPE liner, a porous titanium coated shell, and an uncemented stem with a 32mm head. Tantalum beads were inserted into the VEPE and the femur to measure head wear and stem stability using RSA. RSA and PROM follow-up was obtained postoperatively, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test determined if changes in penetration or migration were significant (p≤0.05).Introduction
Methods
The large diameter mobile polyethylene liner of the dual mobility implant provides increased resistance to hip dislocation. However, a problem specific to the dual mobility system is intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD), secondary to loss of the retentive rim, causing the inner head to dissociate from the polyethylene liner. We hypothesized that impingement of the polyethylene liner with the surrounding soft-tissue inhibits liner motion, thereby facilitating load transfer from the femoral neck to the liner and leading to loss of retentive rim over time. This mechanism of soft-tissue impingement with the liner was evaluated via cadaver experiments, and retrievals were used to assess polyethylene rim damage. Total hip arthroplasty was performed on 10 cadaver hips using 3D printed dual mobility components. A metal wire was sutured to the posterior surface (underside) of the iliopsoas, and metal wires were embedded into grooves on the outer surface of the liner and inner head to identify these structures under fluoroscopy. Tension was applied to the iliopsoas to move the femur from maximum hyperextension to 90° of flexion for the purpose of visualizing the iliopsoas and capsule interaction with the mobile liner. The interaction of the mobile liner with the iliopsoas was studied using fluoroscopy and direct visual observation. Fifteen retrieved dual mobility liners were assessed for rim edge and rim chamfer damage. Rim edge damage was defined as any evidence of contact, and rim chamfer damage was classified into six categories: impact ribs on the chamfer surface, loss of machining marks, scratching or pitting, rim deformation causing a raised lip, a rounded rim edge, or embedded metal debris.Introduction
Methods
Osteolysis caused by wear of the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) often leads to failure. Cross-linking improves wear, but also produces residual free radicals that decrease oxidative stability. 58 patients (64 observed hips), all with osteoarthritis, gave informed consent to participate in a 5 year RSA study. Each patient received a VEPE liner, a Regenerex™ acetabular shell, and an uncemented stem with either a 32mm or 36 mm cobalt chrome femoral head. Tantalum beads were inserted into the VEPE, the pelvic and the femoral bone to measure head penetration into the polyethylene, and shell and stem stability over time, using RSA. RSA radiographs were scheduled immediately postoperatively (up to 6 weeks) and 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks nonparametric test was used to determine if changes in penetration or migration were significant over time at p≤0.05.Introduction
Methods
RSA is widely accepted as a precise method to asses wear and migration early in the postoperative period. In traditional RSA, one segment defines both the acetabular shell and the polyethylene liner. However, inserting beads into the liner permits employment of the shell and liner as two separate segments, thus enabling distinct analysis of the precision of three measurement methods in determining wear and acetabular shell migration. The purpose of this The UmRSA program was used to analyze the double examinations of 51 hips to determine if there was a difference in precision among 3 measurement methods: the shell only, the liner only, and the shell + liner combined segment. Tantalum beads were inserted into the liner and pelvic bone surrounding the shell intraoperatively for the purpose of RSA. Polyethylene wear was measured using point motion of the center of the head with respect to 3 different segments: 1) liner only, 2) the shell only and, 3) shell + liner segment. Cup stability was measured by segment motion comparing the stable pelvic segment to 1) the liner segment, 2) the shell only segment, and 3) the shell + liner segment. The Wilcoxon paired signed-ranks test was used to determine differences in condition number and bead counts among the 3 measurement methods (p ≤0.05).Introduction
Methods
Acetabular cup position is an important factor in successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Optimal cup placement requires surgeons to possess an accurate perception of pelvic orientation during cup impaction, however, varying pelvic anatomy and limited visual cues in the surgical field may interfere with this process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) in monitoring pelvic position during THA. Ten patients scheduled to undergo THA were IRB-approved and consented by four surgeons. A small IMU was placed over the patient's sacrum pre-operatively and zeroed in standing position. Pelvic orientation data was streamed and captured wirelessly throughout the procedure. Surgeons were blinded to all data throughout the study period. Prior to cup impaction, the surgeon indicated his intended cup abduction angle and the degree to which the cup impactor was manipulated to compensate for perceived AP pelvic tilt. The degree of pelvic tilt as determined by the IMU (angle β) was then recorded (Figure 1). AP-pelvis radiographs were measured in Martell Hip Analysis Suite post-operatively to calculate the cup abduction angle, which was then compared to the surgeon's intended abduction angle to determine surgeon accuracy. To predict the final cup abduction angle, the degree of pelvic tilt recorded by the IMU (angle β) was subtracted from the abduction angle of the cup impactor (angle α) that was positioned using the OR table as a reference (Figure 1). This value was then compared to the measured post-operative cup abduction angle in order to assess the accuracy of the IMU in measuring pelvic tilt. Surgeon accuracy and IMU accuracy were compared to determine if the IMU was more or less effective than surgeon perception at determining pelvic tilt.Introduction:
Materials & Methods:
