header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 95 - 95
1 Jan 2016
O'Neill CK Molloy D Patterson C Beverland D
Full Access

Background

The current orthopaedic literature demonstrates a clear relationship between acetabular component positioning, polyethylene wear and risk of dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Problems with edge loading, stripe wear and squeaking are also associated with higher acetabular inclination angles, particularly in hard-on-hard bearing implants.

The important parameters of acetabular component positioning are depth, height, version and inclination. Acetabular component depth, height and version can be controlled with intra-operative reference to the transverse acetabular ligament.

Control of acetabular component inclination, particularly in the lateral decubitus position, is more difficult and remains a challenge for the Orthopaedic Surgeon. Lewinnek et al described a ‘safe zone’ of acetabular component orientation: Radiological acetabular inclination of 40 ± 10° and radiological anteversion of 15 ± 10°.

Accurate implantation of the acetabular component within the ‘safe zone’ of radiological inclination is dependent on operative inclination, operative version and pelvic position.

Traditionally during surgery, the acetabular component has been inserted with an operative inclination of 45°. This assumes that patient positioning is correct and does not take into account the impact of operative anteversion or patient malpositioning.

However, precise patient positioning in order to orientate acetabular components using this method cannot always be relied upon. Hill et al demonstrated a mean 6.9° difference between photographically simulated radiological inclination and the post-operative radiological inclination. The most likely explanation was felt to be adduction of the uppermost hemipelvis in the lateral decubitus position. The study changed the practice of the senior author, with target operative inclination now 35° rather than 40° as before, aiming to achieve a post-operative radiological inclination of 42° ± 5°.

Aim

To determine which of the following three techniques of acetabular component implantation most accurately obtains a desired operative inclination of 35 degrees:

Freehand

Modified (35°) Mechanical Alignment Guide, or

Digital inclinometer assisted


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 113 - 113
1 Jan 2016
Munir S Molloy D Hasted T Jack CM Shimmin A Walter W
Full Access

Sagittal stability of the knee is believed to be of significant importance following total knee arthroplasty. We examine four different knee designs at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively. Sagittal stability was measured at four degrees of flexion: 0°; 30°; 60°; and 90°, to examine the effect of design on mid-flexion stability.

The knee designs included were: the rotating platform LCS design (DePuy); the cruciate sparing Triathlon system (Stryker); SAIPH system (Matortho, UK); and the medial rotating knee design, MRK (Matortho, UK).

Following ethical approval, 64 cases were enrolled into the study, 22 male and 42 female. Inclusion criteria included: a minimum of 18 months from surgery; ability to flex beyond 90 degrees; and have no postoperative complications. 18 LCS, 18 MRK, 14 SAIPH and 14 Triathlon knee designs were analysed. Sagittal stability was measured using the KT1000 device. Active range of movement was measured using a hand held goniometer and recorded as was Oxford knee score, WOMAC knee score, SF12 and Kujala patellofemoral knee score.

Mean follow-up was 33.7 months postoperative, with a mean age of 72 years. Mean weight was 82.7kgs and height 164cms. There was no significant difference in preoperative demographics between the groups. Mean active post-operative range of motion of the knee was from 2–113° with no significant difference between groups.

Sagittal stability was similar in all four groups in full extension; however the MRK and SAIPH designs showed improved stability in the mid-range of flexion (30–90°). Patient satisfaction also showed a similar trend with MRK achieving better patient reported functional outcomes and satisfaction than that of the SAIPH, LCS and Triathlon systems.

All four knee designs demonstrated good post-operative range of movement with comparative improvement of patient scores to other reported studies. The MRK and SAIPH knee design showed an improved mid-flexion sagittal stability with better patient reported satisfaction and functional scores.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 85 - 85
1 Mar 2013
Molloy D Jenabzadeh R Walter W Hasted T
Full Access

Sagittal stability of the knee is believed to be of significant importance following a total knee arthroplasty. We examine three different knee designs at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively. Sagittal stability was measured at four degrees of flexion; 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° to examine the effect of design on mid-flexion stability.

The knee designs included the rotating platform LCS design, the cruciate sparing Triathlon system and the medial rotating knee design, MRK.

Following ethical approval 50 cases were enrolled into the study, 15 male and 35 female. Eighteen LCS, 18 MRK and 14 Triathlon knee designs were analysed. Sagittal stability was measured using the KT1000 device. Active range of movement was measured using a hand held goniometer and recorded as was Oxford knee score, WOMAC knee score, SF12 and Kujala patellofemoral knee score.

Mean follow-up was 37 months postoperative with a mean age of 73 years. Mean weight was 82.7 kgs and height 164 cms. There was no significant difference in preoperative demographics between the groups. Mean active post-operative range of motion of the knee was from 2–113° with no significant difference between groups.

Sagittal stability was similar in all three groups in full extension; however the MRK design showed improved stability in the mid-range of flexion (30–90°). Patient satisfaction also showed a similar trend with MRK achieving slightly better patient reported outcomes than that of the LCS and Triathlon systems, although this was not statistically significant.

All three knee designs demonstrated good post-operative range of movement with comparative improvement of patient scores to other reported studies. The MRK knee design showed an improved mid-flexion sagittal stability.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 127 - 127
1 Mar 2013
Cross MB Esposito C Sokolova A Jenabzadeh R Molloy D Munir S Zicat B Walter WK Walter WL
Full Access

Introduction

Modularity is being increasingly used throughout the world for both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Recently there have been concerns of increased corrosion and fretting at the modular junctions. In the SROM® modular hip system, two modular junctions are the head-neck taper junction and the stem-sleeve taper junction. The aim of this study was to investigate corrosion at these junctions with the use of different bearing materials.

Methods

Between 1994 and 2012, fourty-two patients were revised with SROM® stems. Reasons for revision included aseptic loosening of the cup or stem (11), periprosthetic fracture (2), osteolysis (8), dislocation (13) and other reasons (7). One was revised for stem breakage, and this was excluded from this study. We examined 41 retrieved S-ROM® comprised of 6 metal-on-metal (MOM), 12 metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), 7 ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) and 16 ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). The orientation for all components was marked at the time of revision surgery. Both the proximal sleeve/stem and the femoral head-neck modular junctions were examined under 10X magnification, and graded by two independent observers. The head tapers were divided into 4 regions, and graded using a previously published 3 point scoring system for fretting and corrosion damage (Goldberg et al, Kop et al), for a total corrosion damage score of 12. The SROM stems were also assessed at the sleeve/stem taper junction. Each stem was divided into 8 quadrants, and graded for corrosion and fretting using the same system as the taper. In addition to severity, we also quantified area of corrosion damage of the stem at the sleeve-stem junction from 0–3, which was multiplied by the severity of damage, to give a score out of 9 for each quadrant (maximum total score of 72 for the stem). The bearing type was unknown to the investigators, so the grading was done in a blinded fashion. Corrosion scores were divided by time to account for differences in time to revision.