Pitting damage on implants has been reported and attributed to use of electrocautery. This study aimed to distinguish how different TKA bearing surfaces are susceptible to this type of damage and whether surgeons were aware that this damage can occur. A survey was sent to Hip and Knee Society members to determine what percentage of adult reconstructive surgeons use electrocautery after implantation of components. Three bearing surfaces for primary TKA were selected: CoCr, Oxinium, and zirconium nitride (ZrN) to be damaged by electrocautery with a monopolar (MP, Bovie) and bipolar (BP, Aquamantys) electrocautery with three different energy settings. A comparison of surface damage and backscatter elemental analysis using SEM was performed. Average roughness (Ra), maximal peak-to-valley height (Rz,), kurtosis (Rk), and skewness (Rsk) measurements were collected using a profilometer (DektakXT, Bruker, Tucson, AZ) with a 2.5µm radius stylus to assess an area of 3.8mm by 3.2mm in the central portion of the area for each MP and BP energy setting used to impart damage to the bearing surfaces. A similar undamaged area for each bearing surface was also measured for roughness parameter comparison.Introduction
Methods
Even as the outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to improve, there remain increasing concerns about pain control after surgery and prolonged narcotic use. Cryoneurolysis has been demonstrated to reduce osteoarthritis knee pain for up to 90 days. We hypothesized that postoperative narcotic use could be reduced following preoperative cryoneurolysis of the superficial genicular nerves. Primary TKA patients were randomized into either a control or cryoneurolysis treatment group. Both followed the same preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain management protocol, except the treatment group had cryoneurolysis of their superficial genicular nerves 3–7 days prior to surgery. All patients were prescribed 40 narcotic pills at discharge and pills were counted at 72 hours and at 2,6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint was daily morphine equivalent (DME) based on pill count and secondary endpoints were changes in pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, Jr.) scores.Introduction
Methods
Overwhelming evidence has established obesity as a risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Randomized clinical trials such as the Look AHEAD study have shown long term successful intentional weight loss with an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in overweight and obese type 2 diabetics. Weight loss can also decrease knee pain in persons who have OA, but it is unknown if intentional weight loss can reduce the risk of TKR. To answer this question, data from the Look AHEAD study were examined to determine if intentional weight loss could reduce the risk of TKR. Look AHEAD is a multicenter, randomized trial which began in August 2001 and follow-up continued for a median of 11.3 years at 16 academic centers. 5145 persons aged 45–76 with diabetes were randomized to either an ILI with reduced calorie consumption and increased physical activity designed or to diabetes support and education intervention (DSE). TKR events were ascertained every 6 months. Retrospective data of reported knee pain was assessed using the WOMAC knee pain questionnaire. Participants with partial TKR or revisions were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were used to relate baseline BMI category (obese, Class I, Class II, or Class III obesity), baseline knee pain, and treatment group with TKR. Weight change category (lost<=5%, stable, gained>=2%) from baseline to year 1 follow-up by treatment assignment was also examined as a predictor of TKR after excluding TKR occurring prior to year 1.Introduction
Methods
