header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 366 - 366
1 Jul 2008
Ross E MacGillivray T Simpson H McDicken W
Full Access

Imaging of the musculoskeletal system is vital for delivering optimum treatment particularly in the assessment of fracture healing. X-ray and CT are adequate imaging methods for bone but, soft tissue needs other modalities such as MRI and Ultrasound. We propose the use of Freehand 3D Ultrasound to study the early stages of fracture healing by imaging the bone surfaces around the fracture site and monitoring changes in the surrounding soft tissue.

Freehand 3D ultrasound is acquired by attaching a position sensor to the probe of a conventional 2D diagnostic ultrasound machine. As the probe is moved, its position and orientation are recorded along with the 2D ultrasound images. This enables slices through the body to be viewed that would be inaccessible using a normal ultrasound system. Bone surfaces around a fracture site are scanned and the data reconstructed using the Stradx and Stradwin software developed by Cambridge University, to give a 3D visualization of the area.

To assess the feasibility of this proposed method the lower limbs of healthy volunteers were scanned using a 5–10MHz ultrasound probe. The scanning resolution of the system was evaluated using a phantom to ensure millimetre detail could be detected as would be required for imaging early fracture healing. It was found that detail down to 0.8mm could easily be resolved for measurement.

The 3D system could accurately profile the different soft tissue interfaces. The visible surfaces of the tibia were reconstructed to give 3D models. Additional layers of soft tissue interfaces could easily be added to these models to provide more detail.

This imaging modality can provided detailed 3D models of bone the bone surface and surrounding soft tissue. As ultrasound is non-ionizing, rescanning can be conducted more frequently than with CT or x-ray thus offering a more accurate assessment of a patient’s response to healing.