The rate of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) has been increasing over recent years with increased patient survival from improved cancer treatment. MSCC presents an increasing demand for spinal surgical resources. NICE guidance was issued in 2008 to improve diagnosis and management and to prevent unnecessary delays which may result in disability. The recent advances in management of cancers coupled with improved spinal surgical approaches have improved the outcome in MSCC. Early surgery has been shown to improve restoration of function. A recent systematic review found that surgery produced superior results to radiotherapy alone for the management of MSCC. However, the quality of evidence so far is mostly from observational studies.

We would like to use Bluespier to create a database of MSCC patients referred to our tertiary centre. Our database would include all adult patients referred to the spinal surgical service with MSCC. Information recorded would be the diagnosis, time of onset and imaging, comorbidities, previous interventions, clinical findings, ASIA score, mobility status, sphincteric status, Karnofsky, Tokuhashi, Tomita and Bauer scores. These scores have been shown by numerous studies to have the best predictive value for outcome following MSCC. The SINS and Boriani MSCC protocols will be collected and externally validated. Time to surgery, operative data and intra operative complications will be recorded. PROMs will include the Oswestry / Neck disability index, VAS and SF36 scores. Post operative complications, morbidity and mortality will be collected and the details of any other therapy received. We would score the patients on admission and at 3 months, 6 months and one year post operatively (if survival allows). This will be done in out patients and via postal and telephone questionnaires. The database will flag the time intervals.

This database will enable us to improve the quality of care given to patients with MSCC, provide evidence to highlight the importance of prompt referral and surgical intervention, audit our care against the standards set out by NICE and establish the risks, complications and outcomes of surgical intervention in this high risk group. It will be the first study to externally validate and compare several different scoring systems and protocols (above) in the same cohort. Finally, the data can be used to perform a costing analysis for the treatment of MSCC in the NHS.

Pedicle screw systems are now the commonest method of achieving posterior spinal fixation. Surgical planning in spinal surgery may include measuring pedicle size to guide screw size on WEBPACS. We performed a study to determine whether measuring pedicle size on CT is accurate and reproducible using the WEBPACS ruler tool.

A human cadaveric spine along with 5 geometrical shapes were scanned using a multislice spiral CT scanner with 1mm cuts. The objects and the pedicle diameters for lumbar and thoracic vertebrae in the axial plane were measured independently using the WEBPACS ruler tool by 2 observers (to the nearest 0.1mm). The geometrical shapes and pedicle size on the skeleton were then measured using Vernier callipers by an independent third observer. All measurements were repeated a week later.

The WEBPACS ruler on a CT scan is accurate to within 0.5-0.6mm of the true size of an object. The error for pedicle measurements is marginally higher (0.6-1.0mm) and this may reflect the fact that they are ill defined geometric shapes. Measuring pedicle size on CT for surgical planning may have implications for small pedicles when sizing them up for a good screw.

We aimed (1) to determine the factors which influence outcome after surgery for CES and (2) to study CES MRI measurements. 56 patients with evidence of a sphincteric disturbance who underwent urgent surgery (1994-2002) were identified and invited to clinic. 31 MRIs were available for analysis and randomised with 19 MRIs of patients undergoing discectomy for persistent radiculopathy. Observers estimated the percentage of spinal canal compromise and indicated whether they thought the scan findings could produce CES and whether the discs looked degenerate. Measurements were repeated after two weeks.

(1) 42 patients attended (mean follow up 60 months; range 25–114). Mean age at onset was 41 years (range 24–67). 26 patients were operated on within 48 hours of onset. Acute onset of sphincteric symptoms and the time to operation did not influence the outcomes. Leg weakness at onset persisted in a significant number at follow-up (p<0.005). Bowel disturbance at presentation was associated with sexual problems (<0.005) at follow-up. Urinary disturbance at presentation did not affect the outcomes. The 13 patients who failed their post-operative trial without catheter had worse outcomes. The SF36 scores at follow-up were reduced compared to age-matched norms in the population. The mean ODI was 29, LBOS 42 and VAS 4.5.

(2) No significant correlations were found between MRI canal compromise and clinical outcome. There was moderate to substantial agreement for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility.

The NDI is a simple 10-item questionnaire used to assess patients with neck pain. The original validation was performed on 52 patients with neck pain and the test-retest on 17 whiplash patients with a 2-day interval. The SF36 measures functional ability, wellbeing and the overall health of patients. It is used in health economics to assess the health utility, gain and economic impact of medical interventions.

Objectives were to independently validate the NDI in patients with neck pain and to draw comparison between the NDI and SF36. 160 patients with neck pain attending the spinal clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires. A second questionnaire was completed in 34 patients after a period of 1-2 weeks.

The internal consistency of the NDI and SF36 was calculated using Cronbach alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed using the Bland and Altman method and the concurrent validity between the two questionnaires was assessed using Pearson correlation.

Both questionnaires showed robust internal consistency: SF36 alpha = 0.878 (se=0.014, 95%CI=0.843 to 0.906) and NDI = 0.864 (se=0.017, 95%CI=0.825 to 0.894). The NDI had significant correlation to all eight domains of the SF36 (p<0.001). The individual scores for each of the ten items had significant correlation with the total disability score (p<0.001). The test-retest reliability of the NDI was acceptable.

We have shown irrefutably that the NDI has good reliability and validity and that it stands up well to the SF36.