The relations among tissue quality, socket discomfort, gait characteristics, and socket pressures are not well established for the unilateral below-knee amputee population. These relations were evaluated for six amputees at seventeen regions of interest on the residual limb. Pressure sensors were placed directly on the residual limb. Peak dynamic socket pressures were not directly related to peak joint moments. However, increases in ground reaction forces (GRFs) related to increases in socket pressures. The relations among tissue quality, socket discomfort, gait characteristics, and socket pressures are not well established for the unilateral below-knee amputee population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these relations for six amputees. A thorough understanding of pressure distribution between the residual limb and prosthetic socket is critical to socket design and limb health. The subjects ranged in age from thirty to seventy-two years of age. The inclusion criteria were male, unilateral transtibial amputation, ability to ambulate independently, non-diabetic, no debilitating health conditions, non-recent amputee. Tissue sensation and socket discomfort were evaluated at seventeen regions of interest on the residual limb. Tissue sensation was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to test light touch/deep pressure sensation, tuning fork to test vibration sensation, and pinprick to test pain sensation. Socket discomfort was assessed using 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale. Gait characteristics were recorded during walking using a Motion Analysis System. Socket pressure measurements were made using F-socket pressure sensors in conjunction with I-Scan software program. Pressure sensors were placed directly on residual limb. Gait characteristics and socket pressures were compared across three different testing days. The site-specific tissue sensitivity scores did not correlate with the socket discomfort scores. In addition, site-specific discomfort scores did not correlate with peak socket pressures recorded at subject’s normal walking speed. Significant day-to-day pressure differences were found at four of the seventeen areas of interest. Peak dynamic socket pressures were not directly related to peak joint moments. Two subjects demonstrated direct relations between ground reaction forces (GRFs) and socket pressure on the different test days.
