Recent studies indicate the benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) by using femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants (March et al 1999). These benefits rely on the preservation of native hip structure and improved physiological loading. However, further investigation is needed to compare the outcome of these implants versus the conventional neck-sacrificing stems particularly assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we have investigated the differences in PROs between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.). We hypothesized higher PROs outcome in patients who received treatment by using neck-preserving implants. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the pre and post-operative PROs of patients receiving THA treatment by using neck-sacrificing implant (n=90, age 57±7.9 years) and a matched (BMI, age) cohort group of neck-preserving patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years). Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were using with the follow-up of similar follow up of 412.76 ± 206.98 days (neck sacrificing implant) and 454.63 ± 226.99 days (Neck-Preserving). Multivariate analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney tests were conducted for statistical analyses. Holm-Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons was used with initial significance level of 0.05.Background
Methods
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has long been the standard treatment for cases in which non-surgical alternatives have failed to improve pain and function in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Outcomes from THA have improved over time with better surgical techniques and improved implant designs. While conventional neck-sacrificing implants have been associated with favorable outcomes, there is evidence to suggest biomechanical advantages of newer, femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants, including the Corin MiniHip. However, there is a still a gap of knowledge regarding the potential benefits of the MiniHip stem over conventional neck-sacrificing stems in regards to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we investigated the differences between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short-stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.) arthroplasty concerning PROs, and considering the known features of the short stem design, we hypothesized that MiniHip THA would be associated with improved PROs in comparison to a neck-sacrificing implant system. We further sought to investigate gender effects related to MiniHip or conventional stem surgery. Neck-sacrificing implant patients (n=90, age 57±7.9 years, female=58, male=32) and a matched (matching criteria: follow-up period, BMI, age) cohort group of MiniHip patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years, female: 25, male: 80) reported both pre-operative and post-operative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) at a minimum interval of 6 months post-operatively and up to three years postoperatively. We applied MANCOVA analysis to compare patient-reported outcome subscores from each group using follow-up period as a covariate and employing gender as an additional grouping factor to evaluate gender effects. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple comparisons.Background
Methods
