3D Printed polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has gained widespread use in clinical practice due to its excellent biocompatibility, biomechanical compatibility, and personalization. However, pre-printed PEEK implants are not without their flaws, including bioinert, optimization distortion of 3D printing digital model and prosthetic mismatching. Recent advancements in mechanical processing technology have made it possible to print bone implants with PEEK fused deposition, allowing for the construction of mechanically adaptable implants. In this study, we aimed to synthesize silanized polycitrate (PCS) via thermal polymerization and in situ graft it to PEEK surface to construct an elastomer coating for 3D printed PEEK implants (PEEK-PCS). This incorporation of PCS allows the implant to exhibit adaptive space filling ability and stress dispersal. In vivo and in vitro results, PEEK-PCS exhibited exceptional osseointegration and osteogenesis properties along with macrophage M2 phenotypic polarization, inflammatory factors reducing, promotion of osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Additionally, PEEK-PCS displays good autofluorescence properties in vitro and in vivo, with stable fluorescence for 14 days, suggesting potential bioimaging applications. The study confirms that PEEK in situ grafting with thermo-polymerized PCS elastomers is a viable approach for creating multifunctional (bone defect adaptation, bioimaging, immune regulation, and osseointegration) implants for bone tissue engineering.

One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines.

The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion.

The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.