Aims

Hip arthroscopy (HA) has become the treatment of choice for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, less favourable outcomes following arthroscopic surgery are expected in patients with severe chondral lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of HA in patients with FAI and associated chondral lesions, classified according to the Outerbridge system.

A hot swollen joint is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice. With a broad range of differentials, septic arthritis (SA) is perhaps one of the most concerning. Treated by culture-specific antibiotics and arthroscopic lavage, some patients require multiple washouts. We aimed to determine:

(1) What are the risk factors for development of SA?

(2) What are the risk factors for repeat washout in SA patients?

(3) What are the important clinical differences between a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and SA cohort?

All patients presenting to the emergency department, orthopaedic, and rheumatology clinics between January 2020 to January 2021 with a hot, swollen joint were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previous trauma on the ipsilateral joint, with data missing from their medical records in any of the variables required for analysis, <24 months follow-up were excluded.

Variables of interest in the three-month period preceding the diagnosis of SA were compared between SA and non-SA patients. Factors with a p-value of p<0.100 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. Similar analyses were performed to compare SA patients with multiple washouts with those needing one washout. Demographical and clinical data for PJI patients were collected to delineate important differences with SA cohort.

211 patients were included (SA:28;PJI:24;pseudogout:32;gout:26;others:101). Multivariate analysis showed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), skin infection, and liver disease were risk factors for SA. Amongst patients with septic arthritis, multivariate analysis showed that WBC levels above normal limits (3.6-10.5×109 cells/L) and RA were risk factors for multiple washouts.

Between the SA and PJI cohorts, BMI (p=0.002) was significantly lower in the former, whilst WBC level (p=0.023) and CRP (p<0.0001) was significantly higher in the former.

Early diagnosis of septic arthritis requires understanding the risk factors, namely RA, skin infection, and liver disease. Considering PJI and septic arthritis as the same entity can lead to wrong clinical judgement, and clinicians should be aware of important differences. We believe that the models in this study are of prognostic value to clinicians who are presented with the common presenting compliant of a hot swollen joint.

Fragility ankle fractures are traditionally managed conservatively or with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion is an alternative option for the geriatric patient. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a detailed analysis of the functional and clinical outcomes of hindfoot nailing for fragility ankle fractures presented so far in the literature.

A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, identifying fourteen studies for inclusion. Studies including patients over 60 with a fragility ankle fracture, treated with TTC nail were included. Patients with a previous fracture of the ipsilateral limb, fibular nails, and pathological fractures were excluded.

Subgroup analyses were performed according to (1) open vs closed fractures, (2) immediate post-operative FWB vs post-operative NWB, (3) majority of cohort are diabetics vs minority of cohort are diabetics. Meta-regression analyses were done to explore sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's test.

The pooled proportion of superficial infection, deep infection, implant failure, malunion, and all-cause mortality was 0.10 (95%CI:0.06-0.16; I2=44%), 0.08 (95%CI:0.06-0.11, I2=0%), 0.11 (95%CI:0.07-0.15, I2=0%), 0.11 (95%CI:0.06-0.18; I2=51%), and 0.27 (95%CI:0.20-0.34; I2=11%), respectively. The pooled mean post-operative OMAS score was 54.07 (95%CI:48.98-59.16; I2=85%). The best-fitting meta-regression model included age and percentage of male patients as covariates (p=0.0263), and were inversely correlated with higher OMAS scores.

Subgroup analyses showed that studies with a majority of diabetics had a higher proportion of implant failure (p=0.0340) and surgical infection (p=0.0096), and a lower chance of returning to pre-injury mobility than studies with a minority of diabetics (p=0.0385). Egger's test (p=0.56) showed no significant publication bias.

TTC nailing is an adequate alternative option for fragility ankle fractures. However, current evidence includes mainly case series with inconsistent outcome measures reported and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. Prospective RCTs with long follow-up times and large cohort sizes are needed to clearly guide the use of TTC nailing for ankle fractures.

Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has become the mainstay of treatment. However, chondral lesions are frequently encountered and have become a determinant of less favourable outcomes following arthroscopic intervention.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of hip arthroscopy (HA) in patients with FAI and concomitant chondral lesions classified as per Outerbridge.

A systematic search was performed using the PRISMA guidelines on four databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Studies which included HA as the primary intervention for management of FAI and classified chondral lesions according to the Outerbridge classification were included. Patients treated with open procedures, for osteonecrosis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and previous ipsilateral hip fractures were excluded. From a total of 863 articles, twenty-four were included for final analysis. Demographic data, PROMs, and radiological outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I.

Improved post-operative PROMs included mHHS (mean difference:-2.42; 95%CI:-2.99 to −1.85; p<0.001), NAHS (mean difference:-1.73; 95%CI: −2.23 to −1.23; p<0.001), VAS (mean difference: 2.03; 95%CI: 0.93-3.13; p<0.001). Pooled rate of revision surgery was 10% (95%CI: 7%-14%). Most of this included conversion to THA, with a 7% pooled rate (95%CI: 4%-11%).

Patients had worse PROMs if they underwent HA with labral debridement (p=0.015), had Outerbridge 3 and 4 lesions (p=0.012), concomitant lesions of the femoral head and acetabulum lesions (p=0.029). Reconstructive cartilage techniques were superior to microfracture (p=0.042). Even in concomitant lesions of the femoral head and acetabulum, employing either microfracture or cartilage repair/reconstruction provided a benefit in PROMs (p=0.027).

Acceptable post-operative outcomes following HA with labral repair/reconstruction and cartilage repair in patients with FAI and concomitant moderate-to-severe chondral lesions, can be achieved. Patients suffering from Outerbridge 3 and 4 lesions, concomitant acetabular rim and femoral head chondral lesions that underwent HA with labral debridement, had worse PROMs. Reconstructive cartilage techniques were superior to microfracture. Even in concomitant acetabular and femoral head chondral lesions, employing either microfracture or cartilage repair/reconstruction was deemed to provide a benefit in PROMs.

Fragility ankles fractures in the geriatric population are challenging to manage, due to fracture instability, soft tissue compromise, patient co-morbidities. Traditional management options include open reduction internal fixation, or conservative treatment, both of which are fraught with high complication rates. We aimed to present functional outcomes of elderly patients with fragility ankle fractures treated with tibiotalocalcaneal nails.

171 patients received a tibiotalocalcaneal nail over a six-year period, but only twenty met the inclusion criteria of being over sixty and having poor bone stock, verified by radiological evidence of osteopenia or history of fragility fractures. Primary outcome was mortality risk from co-morbidities, according to the Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI), and patients’ post-operative mobility status compared to pre-operative mobility. Secondary outcomes include intra-operative and post-operative complications, six-month mortality rate, time to mobilisation and union.

The mean age was 77.82 years old, five of whom are type 2 diabetics. The average CCI was 5.05. Thirteen patients returned to their pre-operative mobility state. Patients with low CCI are more likely to return to pre-operative mobility status (p=0.16; OR=4.00).

Average time to bone union and mobilisation were 92.5 days and 7.63 days, respectively. Mean post-operative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and Olerud-Molander scores were 53.0 (range 17-88) and 50.9 (range 20-85), respectively. There were four cases of broken distal locking screws, and four cases of superficial infection. Patients with high CCI were more likely to acquire superficial infections (p=0.264, OR=3.857). There were no deep infections, periprosthetic fractures, nail breakages, non-unions.

TTC nailing is an effective treatment methodology for low-demand geriatric patients with fragility ankle fractures. This technique leads to low complication rates and early mobilisation. It is not a life-changing procedure, with many able to return to their pre-operative mobility status, which is important for preventing the loss of socioeconomic independence.

A major cause of morbidity in lower limb amputees is phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). This study aimed to determine if surgical interposition of nerve endings into adjacent muscle bellies at the time of major lower limb amputation can decrease the incidence and severity of PLP and RLP.

Data was retrospectively collected from January 2015 to January 2021, including eight patients that underwent nerve interposition (NI) and 36 that received standard treatment. Primary outcomes included the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain severity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, behaviour, and interference. Secondary outcome included Neuro-QoL Lower Extremity Function assessing mobility. Cumulative scores were transformed to standardised t scores.

Across all primary and secondary outcomes, NI patients had lower PLP and RLP. Mean ‘worst pain’ score was 3.5 out of 10 for PLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.89 in the control cohort (p=0.298), and 2.6 out of 10 for RLP in the NI cohort, compared to 4.44 in the control cohort (p=0.035). Mean ‘best pain’ and ‘current pain’ scores were also superior in the NI cohort for PLP (p=0.003, p=0.022), and RLP (p=0.018, p=0.134).

Mean PROMIS t scores were lower for the NI cohort for RLP (40.1 vs 49.4 for pain intensity; p=0.014, 44.4 vs 48.2 for pain interference; p=0.085, 42.5 vs 49.9 for pain behaviour; p=0.025). Mean PROMIS t scores were also lower for the NI cohort for PLP (42.5 vs 52.7 for pain intensity; p=0.018); 45.0 vs 51.5 for pain interference; p=0.015, 46.3 vs 51.1 for pain behaviour; p=0.569). Mean Neuro-QoL t score was lower in NI cohort (45.4 vs 41.9;p=0.03).

Surgical interposition of nerve endings during lower limb amputation is a simple yet effective way of minimising PLP and RLP, improving patients’ subsequent quality of life. Additional comparisons with targeted muscle reinnervation should be performed to determine the optimal treatment option.

Open talus fracture are notoriously difficult to manage and they are commonly associated with a high level of complications including non-union, avascular necrosis and infection. Currently, the management of such injuries is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, thus definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. The key principles of open talus fracture management which do not vary between surgeons, however, there is much debate over whether the talus should be preserved or removed after open talus fracture/dislocation and proceeded to tibiocalcaneal fusion.

A review of electronic hospital records for open talus fractures from 2014-2021 returned foureen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, five cases were definitively managed with FUSION, while the others were managed with alternative methods. We collected patient's age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. The average follow-up of the cohort was four years and one month. EQ-5D-5L and FAAM-ADL/Sports score was used as a patient reported outcome measure. Data was analysed using the software PRISM.

Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group.

FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there are a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time, that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate, and quality-of-life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients.

Open tibial fractures can be difficult to manage, with a range of factors that could affect treatment and outcome. We present a large cohort of patients, and analyse which factors have significant associations with infection outcome. Elucidation will allow clinicians to strive for treatment optimisation, and patients to be advised on likely complications

Open tibia fractures treated at a major trauma centre between 2015-2021 were included. Mean age at injury was 55.4 (range 13-102). Infection status was categorized into no infection, superficial infection, and osteomyelitis.

Age, mode of injury, polytrauma, fibula status, Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, wound contamination, time from injury to: first procedure/definitive plastics procedure/definitive fixation, type of definitive fixation, smoking and diabetic status, and BMI, were collected. Multicollinearity was calculated, with highly correlated factors removed. Multinomial logistic regression was performed. Chi Squared testing, with Post Hoc Bonferroni correction was performed for complex categorical factors.

Two hundred forty-four patients with open tibial fractures were included. Forty-five developed superficial infection (18.4%), and thirty-nine developed osteomyelitis (16.0%).

Polytrauma, fibula status, and type of definitive fixation were excluded from the multivariate model due to strong multicollinearity with other variables.

With reference to the non-infected outcome; superficial infection patients had higher BMI (p<0.01), higher GA grade (p<0.01), osteomyelitis patients had longer time to definitive fixation (p=0.049) and time to definitive plastics procedure (p=0.013), higher GA grade (p<0.01), and positive wound contamination(p=0.015).

Poc hoc analysis showed “no infection” was positively associated with GA-I (p=0.029) and GA-II (p<0.01), and negatively associated with GA-IIIC (p<0.01). Osteomyelitis was positively associated with GA-IIIc (p<0.01)

This study investigated the associations between the injury and presentation factors that may affect infection outcome. The variables highlighted are the factors clinicians should give extra consideration to when treating cases, and take preventative measures to optimize treatment and mitigate infection risk.

Fracture related infections (FRI) are debilitating complications of musculoskeletal trauma surgery that can result in permanent functional loss or amputation. This study aims to determine risk factors associated with FRI treatment failure, allowing clinicians to optimise them prior to treatment and identify patients at higher risk.

A major trauma centre database was retrospectively reviewed over a six-year period. Of the 102 patients identified with a FRI (66 male, 36 female), 29.4% (n=30) had acute infections (onset <6 weeks post-injury), 34.3% (n=35) had an open fracture. Open fractures were classified using Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification (type 2:n=6, type 3A:n=16, type 3B:n=10, type 3C:n=3). Patients with periprosthetic infections of the hip and knee joint, those without prior fracture fixation, soft tissue infections, diabetic foot ulcers, pressure sore infections, patients who died within one month of injury, <12 months follow-up were excluded.

FRI treatment failure was defined as either infection recurrence, non-union, or amputation. Lifestyle, clinical, and intra-operative data were documented via retrospective review of medical records. Factors with a P-value of p<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model.

FRI treatment failure was encountered in 35.3% (n=36). The most common FRI site was the femoral shaft (16.7%; n=17), and 15.7% (n=16) presented with signs of systemic sepsis. 20.6% (n=21) had recurrent infection, 9.8% (n=10) had non-union, and 4.9% (n=5) required an amputation. The mean age at injury was 49.71 years old. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, 37 patients were current smokers (36.3%), 31 patients were diabetics (30.4%), and 32 patients (31.4%) were obese (BMI≥30.0). Average follow-up time was 2.37 (range: 1.04-5.14) years. Risk factors for FRI treatment failure were BMI>30, GA type 3c, and implant retention.

Given that FRI treatment in 35.3% (36/102) ended up in failure, clinicians need to take into account the predictive variables analysed in this study, and implement a multidisciplinary team approach to optimise these factors. This study could aid clinicians to redirect efforts to improve high risk patient management, and prompt future studies to trial adjuvant technologies for patients at higher risk of failure.

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction and Objective

Despite the low incidence of pilon fractures among lower limb injuries, their high-impact nature presents difficulties in surgical management and recovery. Current literature includes a wide range of different management strategies, however there is no universal treatment algorithm. We aim to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open and closed pilon fractures, managed using a treatment algorithm that was applied consistently over the span of this study.