Total Hip Arthroplasty has been shown to have excellent long term outcomes, yet early reoperation remains a risk. The current study assesses the incidence, causes, and cost associated with early revision following elective primary THA in the US Medicare population. The study used the Limited Data Set (LDS) from the Centers for Medicate and Medicaid Services (CMS) to identify all primary THA (DRG 469/470) performed in the US (excluding Maryland) during 2016. All cases were followed for one year after the original date of operation to create a database of readmissions after surgery. These data allowed for the determination of the 1-year incidence and type of reoperation, the timing of reoperation, the admitting diagnosis, hospital utilization, and total cost.Introduction
Methods
Failure of metal on metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) due to development of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTRs) is a significant problem. The prevalence of ALTRs in asymptomatic MOM arthroplasty patients is highly variable. The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study was to: 1) determine MRI ALTR prevalence in patients with HRA; 2) determine if patients with HRA have a greater rate of MRI ALTRs compared to control patients with ceramic on poly (COP) THA; and 3) evaluate changes in patient reported outcomes between these implant designs. Following IRB approval with informed consent, self-reported asymptomatic primary COP and HRA patients greater than one year post arthroplasty were evaluated with 4 annual (TP1–4) MRIs using a standardized protocol and serum ion level testing. Morphologic and susceptibility reduced images were acquired for each hip and evaluated for synovial thickness, volume, capsule dehiscence and the presence of ALTR. Patient reported outcomes were evaluated by Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS). Analyses were performed to detect differences of synovial thickness and volume, and HOOS subgroups between and within bearing surfaces at each time point and over time, and to compare the time to and the risk of developing MRI ALTR. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, and length of implantation.Introduction
Methods
