To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a physical and psychological group intervention (BOOST programme) compared to physiotherapy assessment and advice (best practice advice [BPA]) for older adults with neurogenic claudication (NC) which is a debilitating spinal condition. A randomised controlled trial of 438 participants. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months. Data was also collected at 6 months. Other outcomes included Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (symptoms), ODI walking item, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and falls. The analysis was intention-to-treat. We collected the EQ5D and health and social care use to estimate cost-effectiveness. Participants were, on average, 74.9 years old (SD 6.0). There was no significant difference in ODI scores between groups at 12 months (adjusted mean difference (MD): −1.4 [95% Confidence Intervals (CI) −4.03,1.17]), but, at 6 months, ODI scores favoured the BOOST programme (adjusted MD: −3.7 [95% CI −6.27, −1.06]). Symptoms followed a similar pattern. The BOOST programme resulted in greater improvements in walking capacity (6MWT MD 21.7m [95% CI 5.96, 37.38]) and ODI walking item (MD −0.2 [95% CI −0.45, −0.01]) and reduced falls risk (odds ratio 0.6 [95% CI 0.40, 0.98]) compared to BPA at 12 months. Probability that the BOOST programme is cost-effective ranged from 67%–89% across cost-effectiveness thresholds.Purpose and background
Methods and results
To evaluate implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in clinical practice within the National Health Service (NHS). The BeST programme is a group Cognitive Behavioural Approach (CBA) for people with persistent (≥6 weeks) low back pain (LBP). This intervention has been shown to be clinically and cost-effective in a large pragmatic trial. To aid implementation of the BeST programme, an online training intervention (iBeST) was developed.Purpose of study
Background
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can be constant or episodic. Fluctuations are common. We present two different pictures of the CLBP experience; timelines illustrating back pain over time and ‘web diagrams’ showing a snapshot of a phase in time. Semi structured interviews from 34 participants from the UK BeST trial included timelines drawn collaboratively by the researcher and participant. Symptoms, events, treatment and consultations were arranged chronologically along a timeline. Initial thematic analysis on 63 interviews gave bio-psychosocial themes that were spoken about in an integrated way. Further analysis explored these interactions between themes. Interactions were classified as; helpful to recovery, unhelpful or mixed. Web diagrams were drawn for each interview and classified as Dense- mostly unhelpful interactions, Open – a combination of helpful and unhelpful interactions and Sparse – mostly helpful interactions.Background and Purpose
Methods
