header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Apr 2019
Wilson C Inglis M George D
Full Access

Introduction

Revision total hip arthroplasty is a complex procedure and becoming more common. Acetabular implant loosening or fracture has previously been treated with a cup and cage construct. Recent studies have shown significant failure rates with Cup Cage constructs in more complex 3B and 3C Acetabular revisions. As a result the use of 3D printed custom made acetabular components has become more common.

Method

We present 5 cases with severe acetabular bone loss that were treated with 3D printed acetabular components. The components were manufactured by OSSIS medical in New Zealand. The patient's original femoral stem was retained in all cases. Pre operatively the implant design was approved by the arthroplasty team prior to final manufacture. Implants were provided with a sterilisable model used intraoperatively for reference.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Apr 2019
Wilson C Sires J Lennon S Inglis M
Full Access

Introduction

Despite improvement in implants and surgical techniques up to 20% of Total Knee Arthroplasty TKA patients continue to report dissatisfaction. The ATTUNE Knee System was designed to provide better patellar tracking and stability through the mid-range of flexion and therefore improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess patient outcomes in a consecutive series of ATTUNE TKA and ensure early results were comparable to other TKA systems in Australia.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1285 - 1289
1 Sep 2013
Inglis M McClelland B Sutherland LM Cundy PJ

Fractures of the forearm (radius or ulna or both) in children have traditionally been immobilised in plaster of Paris (POP) but synthetic cast materials are becoming more popular. There have been no randomised studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials. The aim of this study was to investigate which cast material is superior for the management of these fractures. We undertook a single-centre prospective randomised trial involving 199 patients with acute fractures of the forearm requiring general anaesthesia for reduction. Patients were randomised by sealed envelope into either a POP or synthetic group and then underwent routine closed reduction and immobilisation in a cast. The patients were reviewed at one and six weeks. A satisfaction questionnaire was completed following the removal of the cast. All clinical complications were recorded and the cast indices were calculated. There was an increase in complications in the POP group. These complications included soft areas of POP requiring revision and loss of reduction with some requiring re-manipulation. There was an increased mean padding index in the fractures that lost reduction. Synthetic casts were preferred by the patients.

This study indicates that the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are superior using synthetic casts with no reduction in safety.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1285–9.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 140 - 140
1 May 2012
Inglis M McCelland B Sutherland L Cundy P
Full Access

Introduction and aims

Cast immobilisation of paediatric forearm fractures has traditionally used plaster of Paris. Recently, synthetic casting materials have been used. There have been no studies comparing the efficacy of these two materials. The aim of this study is to investigate whether one material is superior for paediatric forearm fracture management.

Methods

A single-centre prospective randomised trial of patients presenting to the Women's and Children's Hospital with acute fractures of the radius and/or ulna was undertaken. Patients were enrolled into the study on presentation to the Emergency Department and randomised by sealed envelope into either a fiberglass or plaster of Paris group. Patients then proceeded to a standardised method of closed reduction and cast immobilisation. Clinical follow-up occurred at one and six weeks post-immobilisation. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed following cast removal at six weeks. All clinical complications were recorded and cast indexes were calculated.