The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain over one year in a cohort of patients with chronic post-surgical pain at three months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Between 2016 and 2019, 363 patients with troublesome pain, defined as a score of ≤ 14 on the Oxford Knee Score pain subscale, three months after TKA from eight UK NHS hospitals, were recruited into the Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) clinical trial. Self-reported neuropathic pain and postoperative pain was assessed at three, nine, and 15 months after surgery using the painDETECT and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaires collected by postal survey.Aims
Methods
There is a need to develop approaches to reduce chronic pain after total knee replacement. There is an established link between disturbed sleep and pain. We tested the feasibility of a trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a pre-operative sleep assessment and complex intervention package for improving long-term pain after TKR. REST was a feasibility multi-centre randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study and health economics. Participants completed baseline measures and were randomised to usual care or the intervention, a tailored sleep assessment and behavioural intervention package delivered by an extended scope practitioner three months pre-operatively with a follow-up call up at four-weeks. Patient reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, one-week pre-surgery, and 3-months post-surgery.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Approximately 15–20% of patients report chronic pain three months after total knee replacement (TKR). The STAR care pathway is a clinically important and cost-effective personalised intervention for patients with pain 3 months after TKR. The pathway comprises screening, assesment, onward referral for treatment and follow-up over one year. In a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the pathway with usual care, the pathway improved pain at 6 and 12 months. This study examined the longer-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of the STAR care pathway. STAR trial participants were followed-up at a median of 4 years post-randomisation. Co-primary outcomes were self-reported pain severity and interference in the replaced knee, assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Resource use from electronic hospital records was valued with UK reference costs.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Total knee replacement (TKR) aims to reduce pain and functional limitations. Despite a good outcome for many, 15–20% patients report chronic pain three months after TKR. The STAR Care Pathway is a clinically important and cost effective treatment to improve pain outcomes over 1 year for people with chronic pain at 3 months after total knee replacement surgery. The care pathway is delivered by specially trained Extended Scope Practitioners (ESPs). There is a gap between research findings and translation into practice. This work shows how the STAR trial findings were implemented into NHS practice at a single centre and the further work required to enable national implementation. Trial findings were presented to NHS managers with a business case for an implementation pilot. Trial documentation was adapted for use in usual care using the COM-B model for behaviour change and evidence-based approaches to increase the return of postal questionnaires. Trial sites were contacted to understand their capacity to implement the intervention locally.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Total knee replacement (TKR) is a successful operation for many patients, however 15–20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Many will experience neuropathic characteristics. We describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain in a cohort of patients with CPSP three months after TKR. Between 2016–2019, 363 patients with troublesome pain, ≤14 on Oxford Knee score pain subscale, at three months after TKR from eight NHS hospitals were recruited into the Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) trial. Self-reported neuropathic pain was assessed at three, nine and fifteen months after surgery using painDETECT and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4).Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Around 20% of patients who have total knee replacement find that they experience long-term pain afterwards. There is a pressing need for better treatment and management for patients who have this kind of pain but there is little evidence about how to improve care. To address this gap we are developing a complex intervention comprising a clinic to assess potential causes of a patient's long-term pain after knee replacement and onwards referral to appropriate, existing services. The Medical Research Council recommends that development of complex interventions include several stages of development and refinement and involvement of stakeholders. This study comprises the penultimate stage in the comprehensive development of this intervention. Earlier stages included a survey of current practice, focus groups with healthcare professionals, a systematic review of the literature and expert deliberation. Healthcare professionals from diverse clinical backgrounds with experience of caring for patients with long-term pain after knee replacement were sent a study information pack. Professionals who wished to participate were asked to return their signed consent form and completed study questionnaire to the research team. Participants rated the appropriateness of different aspects of the assessment process and care pathway from 1–9 (not appropriate to very appropriate). Data were collated and a document prepared, consisting of anonymised mean appropriateness ratings and summaries of free-text comments. This document was then discussed in 4 facilitated meetings with healthcare professional held at the future trial centres. A summary report and revised care pathway was then prepared and sent to participants for further comments. 28 professionals completed the questionnaire and/or attended a meeting. Participants included surgeons, physiotherapists, nurses, pain specialists and rheumatologists. Mean appropriateness scores ranged from 6.9 to 8.4. Taking a score of 7–9 as agreement, consensus was achieved that the assessment should be performed at 3 months post-operative by an extended scope practitioner/nurse, treatment be guided by a standardised assessment of pain, and treatment individualised. There was also agreement that referrals in the care pathway to surgical review, GP and pain clinics were appropriate. Nurse-led/self-monitoring was rated lower (6.9) because of considerations about the need to ensure that patients receive appropriate support, follow-up and referral to other services. This work demonstrates the research methods that can be used to refine the design of a complex intervention. The process and findings enable refinement of an intervention for patients with long-term pain after knee replacement. The next stage of intervention development will assess the acceptability and reliability of the assessment process, and the usability of the intervention's standard operating procedures. The intervention will then be evaluated by a larger research team in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial, starting in late 2016.
This study is a prospective analysis of clinical outcome in 201 consecutive patients treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft between October 2005 and January 2011. Patients received pre and post-operative clinical evaluation, radiological assessment and outcome scoring systems. 193 patients (92 male, 119 female) underwent 211 procedures, with mean age 26 (16–49) and follow-up 16 months (6–42 months). Indications were atraumatic recurrent patella dislocation (68%), traumatic recurrent dislocation (22.8%), instability (5%), single dislocation (2.7%) and anterior knee pain (1.4%). Trochlea dysplasia was moderate in 57% and mild in 35%. There have been no recurrent dislocations/ subluxations. 10 patients have required further surgery. The mean pre-op Kujala Scores were 55 (SE 5.21) and post-op scores improved to mean 82 (31–100) (SE 1.18)(p < 0.001). This improvement and significance is mirrored with Oxford (27 to 41), WOMAC (76 to 93), Fulkerson (53 to 83), IKDC (46 to 75), Tegner (4.1 to 5.3) and SF12 (38 to 51) scores (p < 0.005). 93% of patients were satisfied with their operation. History of prior realignment surgery was associated with significantly worse outcomes compared to patients where MPFL reconstruction was their first realignment procedure (p < 0.05). This series is the largest reported in the literature for any technique of MPFL surgery. This technique allows for objective intra-operative evaluation of the required graft tension to optimise patella tracking.
Optimal utilisation of operating theatres has a significant impact on the ability of an institution to deliver productive, value for money surgical services. With the recent introduction of the national ‘Productive Theatres’ programme and in the current economic climate it is receiving increasing attention. In addition, it improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, reduces adverse events and has positive influences on staff morale. The aim of this study was to highlight factors influencing trauma theatre utilisation in general, whilst also addressing any problems identified with a view to improving trauma services locally. We conducted a prospective analysis of activity in the trauma theatre at our institution over 1 month. Direct observation was performed by a single independent observer. In the absence of any published guidelines, all theatre lists were assessed against pre-determined standards for each component of the theatre pathway. Overall end utilisation (combined time utilised for anaesthesia and surgery) was found to be low at 65%. A number of factors were found to contribute to inefficiencies including delay in sending for patients (mean 42mins, range 0-105), prolonged patient transit times to theatre (mean 22% of all sessions), late starts to lists (mean 43 mins, range 15-105 mins) waiting for x-ray availability (mean 21mins, range 10-45) and knock on delay from previous lists. Surgeons and anaesthetists were found to be, overall, arriving on time or early for all lists. Strategies for maximising trauma theatre productivity are essential. This study has identified common issues, of potential benefit to numerous institutions when planning trauma services.
Scaphoid injuries remain a challenge in both diagnosis and subsequent management. Untreated scaphoid non-union leads to inevitable osteoarthritis. Non-unions are picked up via an established management pathway in out trust and treated surgically with a standardised technique of non-vascularised bone grafting and retrograde screw fixation. Patients that underwent primary screw fixation and grafting for scaphoid non-union between 2004-2008 were reviewed. These patients were followed up clinically and radiologically. They were assessed for time to union, complications, DASH score, patient satisfaction and return to work. In addition comparison was made between the use of Herbert screw and Twinfix screw fixation and between tricortical iliac crest graft and corticocancellous distal radial bone graft. Forty-two consecutive patients underwent surgery of which 35 (83%) were available for follow up. Mean follow up was 39 months (range 13-72). 31 (89%) patients had gone on to radiological union. Of those united the mean DASH score was 11. Mean time to union was 4.4 months (range 2-15 95% CI 3.3 – 5.5). 95% of patients were satisfied with their operation and would recommend it to a friend in the same situation. No significant difference in outcomes were identified between Herbert screw and Twinfix screw fixation or between iliac crest or distal radial bone grafting techniques. This study has shown encouraging results for an established protocol for management of scaphoid non-union. Outcomes are as a good as any published comparable series in the literature and provide further support to the use of this technique.
To investigate the effect of lab-based simulator training, on the ability of surgical trainees to perform diagnostic knee arthroscopy. 20 orthopaedic SHOs with minimal arthroscopic experience were randomised to 2 groups. 10 received a fixed protocol of simulator based arthroscopic skills training using a bench-top knee model. Learning curves were clearly demonstrated using motion analysis equipment to monitor performance. All 20 then spent an operating list with a blinded consultant trainer. They received instruction and demonstration of diagnostic knee arthroscopy before performing the procedure independently. Their performance was assessed using the intra-operative section of the Orthopaedic Competence Assessment Project (OCAP) procedure based assessment (PBA) protocol for diagnostic arthroscopy. Performance was further quantified with a ten point global rating assessment scale.Objective
Method
