Aims

Metal-on-metal total hip replacements (MoM THRs) are frequently revised. However, there is a paucity of data on clinical outcomes following revision surgery in this cohort. We report on outcomes from the largest consecutive series of revisions from MoM THRs and consider pre-revision factors which were prognostic for functional outcome.

Introduction

Trial reduction while performing total hip replacement is an essential step of the procedure. This is to check the stability of the hip joint with the selected implant sizes and to assess the leg length to avoid discrepancy.

Disengagement of the femoral head trial from the femoral rasp stem, with subsequent migration of the trial head into the pelvic cavity is a rare occurrence, but can be a very frustrating complication to both the surgeon and occasionally the patient.

We present our experience with this exceptional situation and different management options, together with systematic review of the literature.

In a society whereby the incidence of obesity is increasing and medico-legal implications of treatment failure are more frequently ending with the consulting doctor, clarity is required as to any restrictions placed on common orthopaedic implants by manufacturing companies. The aim of this study was to identify any restrictions placed on the commonly used femoral stem implants in total hip replacement (THR) surgery, by the manufacturers, based on patient weight. The United Kingdom (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR) was used to identify the five most commonly used cemented and uncemented femoral stem implants during 2012. The manufacturing companies responsible for these implants were asked to provide details of any weight restrictions placed on these implants. The Corail size 6 stem is the only implant to have a weight restriction (60Kg). All other stems, both cemented and uncemented, were free of any restrictions. Fatigue fracture of the femoral stem has been well documented in the literature, particularly involving the high nitrogen stainless steel cemented femoral stems and to a lesser extent the cemented cobalt chrome and uncemented femoral stems. In all cases excessive patient weight leading to increased cantilever bending of the femoral stem was thought to be a major factor contributing to the failure mechanism. From the current literature there is clearly an association between excessive patient weight and fatigue failure of the femoral stem. We suggest avoiding, where possible, the insertion of small stems (particularly cemented stems) and large offset stems (particularly those with a modular neck) in overweight patients.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are a challenging problem to manage. In the literature various constructs have been designed and tested, most requiring cables for proximal fixation. The Synthes Locking Attachment Plate (LAP) has been designed to achieve proximal fixation without the use of cables.

The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate the LAP construct in comparison to a Cable plate construct, for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Twelve synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending and torsion to determine initial stiffness, and stiffness following fixation of a simulated midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Two different fracture fixation constructs (six per group) were assessed. Each construct incorporated a broad curved LCP with bi-cortical locking screws for distal fixation. In the Cable construct, 2 cables and 2 uni-cortical locking screws were used for proximal fixation. In the LAP construct, the cables were replaced by a LAP with 4 bicortical locking screws. Axial, lateral bending and torsional stiffness were assessed using intact specimen values as a baseline. Axial load to failure was also measured. The LAP construct was significantly stiffer than the cable construct under axial load with a bone gap (simulating a comminuted fracture) (p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two constructs in any of the other modalities tested. Loading to failure resulted in no significant differences between constructs, in either initial stiffness or peak load.

In conclusion the LAP construct enables bi-cortical screw fixation around a prosthesis. Compared to cables, this was stiffer when there was a bone gap and thus should offer improved proximal fixation of Vancouver B1 proximal femoral fractures in cemented THA.

Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. There is increasing pressure for elective orthopaedic patients, including those undergoing foot and ankle surgery, to be prescribed chemical thromboprophylaxis post-operatively in order to reduce the risk of a thromboembolic event. The risks of chemical thromboprophylaxis in terms of increased bleeding, wound problems and HIT are well documented. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery with and without the use of aspirin.

We audited a consecutive series of 1625 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery between 2003 and 2010. Between 2003 and 2006 inclusive, aspirin was used post operatively as chemical thromboprohylaxsis. Between 2007 and 2010, no chemical thromboprohylaxsis was used. The follow-up period for all patients was at least three months post-operatively. Most patients were reviewed at 3 months by the senior surgeon. Those who were reviewed less than 3 months (patients undergoing minor procedures) were contacted via telephone to confirm whether a thromboembolic event had been diagnosed.

There was no loss to follow up. Of the 1625 patients, 555 patients received aspirin and 1070 patients received no chemical thromboprohylaxsis. 5 of 1625 (0.31%) patients developed a clinically significant thromboembolic event. 3 patients developed a DVT at an average time of 5 weeks post operatively. 2 patients developed non-fatal PE at an average time of 7 weeks post operatively. 3 of the 5 thromboembolic events occurred in the aspirin group (all DVT's) whereas 2 of the 5 (all PE) developed in the non aspirin group.

The incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events is low in elective orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. We suggest that the benefit of chemical thromboprophylaxis does not outweigh its potential risks in foot and ankle surgery.

We describe three children with symptoms of damage to the attachment of an anomalous ossific centre of the lower fibular epiphysis. All three were aged 8 to 10 years at the time of the initial injury, had suffered recurrent ankle sprains and had well localised and consistent tenderness precisely at the site of the anomalous ossific centre. All their symptoms were relieved by excision of the ossicle with reconstitution of the fibular collateral ligament. Whilst a separate secondary centre of ossification at the lower fibula is present in 1% of healthy children between the ages of 6 and 12 years, the condition described is extremely uncommon. Excision of the fragment should be reserved for those patients with recalcitrant symptoms and with consistent tenderness precisely at the site of the accessory ossicle.