header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 6 | Pages 787 - 797
1 Jun 2018
Shuler MS Roskosky M Kinsey T Glaser D Reisman W Ogburn C Yeoman C Wanderman NR Freedman B

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a continuous, non-invasive monitor for acute compartment syndrome (ACS).

Patients and Methods

NIRS sensors were placed on 86 patients with, and 23 without (controls), severe leg injury. NIRS values were recorded for up to 48 hours. Longitudinal data were analyzed using summary and graphical methods, bivariate comparisons, and multivariable multilevel modelling.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 441 - 442
1 Nov 2011
Glaser D Dennis D Komistek R Deaderick S Mahfouz M
Full Access

In vivo kinematic analyses of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have determined femoral head separation from the medial aspect of the acetabular component can occur. Various bearing materials are currently used in THA today. The objective of this study was to determine if differences in the incidence and magnitude of femoral head separation exist among various bearing surfaces for THA during different weight-bearing activities.

205 clinically successful subjects implanted with either metal-on-metal (MOM), metalon-polyethylene (MOP), ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) materials were analyzed using video-fluoroscopy. Each patient performed either gait on a treadmill or an abduction-adduction activity. The fluoroscopic information was then analyzed using a computer aided 3D model fitting technique to determine the incidence and magnitude of hip separation. Additional variables analyzed included femoral head diameter, follow-up duration, and type of surgical approach utilized.

Less separation was noted with increasing femoral head diameter during abductionadduction.

Increased separation was observed during gait as follow-up duration increased. Hip separation was greater during gait when a posterolateral surgical approach was used but was greater in abduction-adduction if a antero-lateral approach was selected. The incidence and magnitude of hip separation during gait was least in subjects with COC THA and least with COC and MOM THA when analyzed during abduction-adduction.

It’s been proposed that THA patients are subject to femoral head separation due to alterations in the soft tissue supporting structures during THA that affect constraint of the joint.

The current analysis demonstrates lower magnitudes and incidence of THA separation occur when hard-on-hard bearing surfaces are selected and can vary based on femoral head diameter, follow-up duration, and surgical approach used. Potential detrimental effects resulting from THA separation include premature polyethylene wear, component loosening (secondary to impulse loading conditions) and hip instability.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 405 - 405
1 Nov 2011
Blumenfeld T Glaser D Bargar W Komistek R Langston G Mahfouz M
Full Access

Previous in vivo studies pertaining to THA performance have focused on the analysis of gait. Unfortunately, higher demand activities have not yet been analyzed. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the in vivo kinematics for THA patients, using fluoroscopy, while they performed four higher demand activities.

The 3D in vivo kinematics of 10 THA patients were analyzed during the following activities: pivoting (PI), tying a shoe (SHOE), sitting down (SDOWN) and standing up (SUP) with and without the aid of handrails. Patients were matched for age, height, weight, body mass index, diagnosis and femoral head diameter to control for confounding variables possibly having influence on the hip performance and kinematics of the various activities.

The largest amount, incidence and variation of separation (femoral head sliding in the acetabular cup) were achieved during the PI with 1.5mm (SD 1.1) and 9 of 10 (90%) subjects experiencing separation. For the SHOE, SDOWN and SUP activities the average separation values were 1.1, 1.2 and 0.7mm, respectively. Femoral head separation was observed in 8 of 10 subjects (80%) during SHOE, in 9 (90%) during SDOWN, and in only one of 6 (60%) during SUP.

In this present study, subjects demonstrated hip separation during the high demand subjects, which could be a concern because these same activities are subjected to higher bearing surface forces. Also, the presence of hip separation leads to reduced contact area between the femoral head and the acetabular cup, possibly leading to higher contact stresses.