header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 51 - 51
1 May 2017
Frame M
Full Access

Aim

The aim of this study is to outline the steps and techniques required to create a patient specific 3D printed guide for the accurate placement of the origin of the femoral tunnel for single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Introduction

Placements of the femoral tunnels for ACL reconstruction have changed over the years. Most recently there has been a trend towards placing the tunnels in a more anatomic position. There has been subsequent debate as to where this anatomic position should be. The problem with any attempt at consensus over the placement of an anatomic landmark is that each patient has some variation in their positioning and therefore a fixed point for all has compromise for all as it is an average. Our aim was to attempt to make a cost effective and quick custom guide that could allow placement of the center of the patients’ newly created femoral tunnel in the mid position of their contralateral native ACL femoral footprint.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 322 - 322
1 Jul 2014
Frame M
Full Access

Summary Statement

We are taking very expensive cutting edge technology, usually reserved for industry, and using it with the help of open source free software and a cloud 3D printing services to produce custom and anatomically unique patient individual implants for only £32. This is approx. 1/100th of the traditional cost of implant production.

Introduction

3D printing and rapid prototyping in surgery is an expanding technology. It is often used for preoperative planning, procedure rehearsal and patient education. There have been recent advances in orthopaedic surgery for the development of patient specific guides and jigs. The logical next step as the technology advances is the production of custom orthopaedic implants. Our aim was to use freely available open source software, a personal computer and consumer access online cloud 3D printing services to produce an accurate patient specific orthopaedic implant without utilising specialist expertise, capital expenditure on specialist equipment or the involvement of traditional implant manufacturing companies. This was all to be done quickly, cost effectively and in department.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Apr 2014
Frame M Ferguson K Jones B
Full Access

Introduction:

When having to remove broken or embedded metal implants using high speed burrs, the consequence is often a significant amount of metal debris which becomes embedded in the soft tissues. This may then act as a source for a foreign body inflammatory reaction or as a third body wear in the situation of joint arthroplasty. We describe a simple, cheap and effective method of reducing this debris using only a sterile water-based lubricating gel.

Materials & Methods:

Several experimental surgical models consisting of porcine muscle over a polyethylene tube with a large fragment titanium locking plate and screw secured to it were constructed. In 8 separate models a screw head locked within the plate was subjected to 90 seconds of high speed burring to create debris. On 4 models no water-based lubricating gel was utilized and on the remaining 4 the surrounding soft tissues were coated in the water-based lubricating gel (AQUAGEL, Halliburton – 42g £1.98). All models were then irrigated with NaCl 500mls using a 20mlsl syringe under manual pressure. Images were then captured after irrigation. The amount of debris was quantified by processing with ImageJ (a public domain, Java-based image processing program developed at the National Institutes of Health and is a computer automated program for counting particles.) The results were then statistically analysed using a student t test (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_30 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Aug 2013
Sciberras N Frame M Bharadwaj R Holt G Khan M
Full Access

Reconstruction of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty presents a significant surgical challenge. Such defects are associated with significant loss of host bone stock, which must be addressed in order to achieve stable implant fixation. A number of imaging techniques including CT scanning with 3D image reconstruction are available to assist the surgeon in the pre-operative planning of such procedures.

We describe the use of a novel technique to assist the pre-operative planning of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty.

Patient and Methods – We present the use of this technique in the case of a 78 year old patient who presented 20 years from index procedure with severe hip pain and inability to weight bear due aseptic loosening of a previously revised total hip arthroplasty. A Paprosky 3B defect was noted with intra-pelvic migration of the acetabular component. Pre-operative investigations included: inflammatory markers, pelvic CT scan with 3D reconstruction, pelvic angiography and hip aspiration.

Using DICOM images obtained from the CT scan, we used free open source software to carry out a 3D surface render of the bony pelvis. This was processed and converted to a suitable format for 3D printing. Using selective laser sintering, a physical 3D model of the pelvis, acetabular component and proximal femur were produced. Using this model the surgeon was able to gain an accurate representation of both the position of the intra-pelvic cup and more accurately assess the loss of bone stock. This novel technique is particularly useful in the pre-operative planning of such complex acetabular defects in order to determine if/which reconstruction technique is most likely to be successful.

3D printing is a relatively recent technology, which has numerous potential clinical applications. This is the first reported case of this technology being used to assess acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. The use of this technology gives the surgeon a 3D model of the pelvis, quickly (7 days from CT) and at a tenth of the cost (£280) of producing such a model through the traditional commercial routes. The model allowed the surgeon to size potential implant, quantify the amount of bone graft required (if applicable) and to more accurately classify the loss of acetabular bone stock.