Outsourcing elective surgery has become increasingly commonplace to meet increasing demand from a growing & aging population. There is concern that outsourcing was influencing the nature of residual workload that was unsuitable for treatment elsewhere. This led to the impression that our unit is operating on more complex patients orthopaedic problems, ASA and Body Mass Index (BMI). By losing a disproportionate number of straightforward patients our department's outcomes, productivity and training opportunities could be adversely affected.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of primary hip / knee arthroplasties between July & December for 2014(pre-outsourcing), 2015 and 2016(post-outsourcing). ANOVA, Tukey Honest Significant Difference(HSD) and Pearson's correlation used.

Total of 726 primary arthroplasties were performed with an almost 50 % reduction post outsourcing. Post-outsourcing, BMI and ASA were significantly worse with a ANOVA of p=0.001 and HSD p=0.003. Length of stay increased from 5.4 days in 2014 to 6.2 days in 2015 ANOVA p< 0.001 but decreased in 2016. BMI significantly affected operating time (Pearson's r =0.12, p< 0.05) and anaesthetic time (Pearson's r =0.19, p< 0.05). ASA significantly affected length of hospital stay, p< 0.01 and operation time, p=0.007 but no effect on anaesthetic time.

In conclusion, we are operating on more complex patients due to current outsourcing setup. Implications for short-term were on anaesthetic and operation time, inpatient stay and training opportunity were affected, with possible long-term implications on individual surgeon and unit outcomes (complications, patient satisfaction).

Resuscitation decisions are part of routine practice and raise difficult, sensitive issues. We present experience of Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) decision-making in our unit.

Patients and staff (medical, nursing) completed a questionnaire to ascertain current practice, knowledge, and patient feeling regarding DNAR decisions.

Consultants and Registrars make DNAR decisions, junior-doctors and nurses feel they have insufficient knowledge. Senior-doctors were most familiar with BMA and Trust guidelines. The majority of all staff felt every patient should be asked. Consultants thought DNAR decision-making was least necessary.

Half of patients felt doctors had not explained the necessity of DNAR decisions and half felt conversations could have been handled better. Half said they had not been asked their opinion. Two-thirds would like more visual information.

UK-wide figures show 15% survival to discharge of in-hospital arrest; a-third of medical staff knew this. Registrars were most optimistic and consultants and ward doctors most pessimistic. All patients believed survival rate was 50%.

Important DNAR decisions are based on poor knowledge and communication. We developed an education programme for staff and information-video for patients and relatives to improve service. Video for DNAR discussions has not been previously used; it will provide a framework on which to approach this sensitive issue.

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors, financial costs and outcomes associated with infection after hip fracture surgery.

Prospective hip fracture data from the University Hospital, Nottingham, was analysed, assessing patients with either deep or superficial wound infections admitted over a five year period.

3605 patients underwent hip fracture surgery. 2.3% of these patients developed a wound infection of which 1.2% were deep wound infections. 75% of infections were due to Staphylococcus aureus and 50% of all infections were caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

No statistically significant risk factors for the development of infection were identified in this study.

Length of stay, cost of treatment and pre-discharge mortality were all increased with deep infection. Deep wound infection increased the average length of stay from 28 days to 100 days. This quadrupled the ward costs. The mean overall hospital cost of treating a hip fracture complicated by deep wound infection was £34903 compared to £8979 fro those who did not develop infection. Pre-discharge mortality increased from 24.2% in the control group to 30% in the infected group (p<0.006).

MRSA significantly increased costs, LOS, and pre-discharge mortality compared with non-MRSA infection.

These results show the huge impact that infection after hip fracture surgery has both on mortality and hospital costs.

From 1998 to July 2003 admissions for elective arthroplasty surgery in Derriford Hospital were nursed alongside other orthopaedic and general medical patients. Since August 2003 a policy of pre-operative MRSA screening and a unit reserved exclusively for MRSA-free joint replacement patients have been used. No transfers from other wards were allowed. Patients positive on screening underwent eradication and were admitted to a different ward where they received teicoplanin on induction (in addition to standard policy cephradine). All post-operative wound infections following THR & TKR were monitored (NINSS surveillance system). Infections within 3 months were recorded. A control of non-screened hip hemi-arthroplasty patients was used to ensure a departmental wide reduction in MRSA was not occurring.

1.9% MRSA carriage rate was detected over the study. Before screening, 0.59% of 3386 cases were acutely infected with MRSA. After institution of screening and a dedicated MRSA free unit, 0.10% of 1034 were acutely infected. This was a 6-fold decrease (p<0.05). The infection noted was in a patient treated outside the ringfenced unit on High Dependency. In fact the infection rate on the ringfenced unit was zero. MRSA infection in the control was statistically unchanged during this period.