header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 30 - 30
1 Dec 2014
Nortje M Hussey D McLennan-Smith R Dymond I Grobler G Dower B Bragdon C Muratoglu O Malchau H
Full Access

Introduction:

The ASR™ Articular Surface Replacement and ASR™ XL Metal-on-Metal systems were recalled due to high revision rates at five years. A worldwide clinical follow-up of patients was initiated. This paper summarizes current findings in South Africa (SA) in comparison with those outside SA (OSA).

Methods:

Patients were followed annually, or until revision, from 10 clinical centers worldwide. Data collected includes demographic, surgical, radiographic, blood metal ion levels, and patient reported outcome measures (PROM).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 66-B, Issue 3 | Pages 408 - 410
1 May 1984
Dymond I

The integrity of the periosteum and the interosseous membrane determine the stability of fractures of the distal ulna; this is indicated by the initial displacement. In fractures displaced by less than 50% the periosteum and interosseous membranes are largely intact; these fractures are stable and require only below-elbow immobilisation for protection and relief of pain. In fractures displaced by more than 50% the membranes are disrupted; these fractures are unstable and require above-elbow immobilisation for stability. As most fractures are displaced by less than 50%, immobilisation of the elbow, which significantly increases morbidity, is usually unnecessary. I report the results of a cadaveric study on the pathomechanics of fractures of the distal ulna, and of a prospective clinical trial in which the type of cast used for immobilisation was determined by the stability of the fracture.