Thresholds of acceptable early migration of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have traditionally ignored the effects of patient and implant factors that may influence migration. The aim of this study was to determine which of these factors are associated with overall longitudinal migration of well-fixed tibial components following TKA. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) data over a two-year period were available for 419 successful primary TKAs (267 cemented and 152 uncemented in 257 female and 162 male patients). Longitudinal analysis of data using marginal models was performed to examine the associations of patient factors (age, sex, BMI, smoking status) and implant factors (cemented or uncemented, the size of the implant) with maximum total point motion (MTPM) migration. Analyses were also performed on subgroups based on sex and fixation.Aims
Methods
Identifying knee osteoarthritis patient phenotypes is relevant to assessing treatment efficacy. Biomechanical variability has not been applied to phenotyping, yet features may be related to outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an inherently mechanical surgery. This study aimed to i) identify biomechanical phenotypes among TKA candidates based on demographic and gait mechanic similarities, and ii) compare objective gait improvements between phenotypes post-TKA. TKA patients underwent 3D gait analysis one-week pre (n=134) and one-year post-TKA (n=105). Principal component analysis was applied to frontal and sagittal knee angle and moment gait waveforms, extracting major patterns of variability. Demographics (age, sex, BMI), gait speed, and frontal and sagittal pre-TKA angle and moment principal component (PC) scores previously found to differentiate sex, osteoarthritis (OA) severity, and symptoms of TKA recipients were standardized (mean=0, SD=1, [134×15]) to perform multidimensional scaling and machine learning based hierarchical clustering. Final clusters were validated by examining inter-cluster differences at baseline and gait changes (PostPCscore–PrePCscore) by k-way Chi-Squared, and ANOVA tests.Introduction
Methods
Patient-specific instrumentation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a technique permitting the targeting of individual kinematic alignment, but deviation from a neutral mechanical axis may have implications on implant fixation and therefore survivorship. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the fixation of tibial components implanted with patient-specific instrumentation targeting kinematic alignment (KA+PSI) A total of 47 patients due to undergo TKA were randomized to KA+PSI (n = 24) or MA+CAS (n = 23). In the KA+PSI group, there were 16 female and eight male patients with a mean age of 64 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
Early implant migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) has been proposed as a useful predictor of long-term fixation of tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Evaluation of actual long-term fixation is of interest for cemented components, as well as for cementless fixation, which may offer long-term advantages once osseointegration has occurred. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term migration with one- and two-year migration to evaluate the predictive ability of short-term migration data and to compare migration and inducible displacement between cemented and cementless (porous metal monoblock) components at least ten years postoperatively. Patients who had participated in RSA migration studies with two-year follow-up were recruited to return for a long-term follow-up, at least ten years from surgery. Two cemented tibial designs from two manufacturers and one porous metal monoblock cementless tibial design were studied. At the long-term follow-up, patients had supine RSA examinations to determine migration and loaded examinations (single leg stance) to determine inducible displacement. In total, 79 patients (54 female) returned, with mean time since surgery of 12 years (10 to 14). There were 58 cemented and 21 cementless tibial components.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty has been proposed to offer advantages long-term once osteointegration has occurred as there is no substrate between the implant and the bone to fail. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a useful tool to study fixation, but typically focused on early migration in the first two post-operative years. Few studies have looked at 10-year RSA migration in cementless fixation and those that have contain small numbers of subjects. The objective of this study was to compare implant migration and inducible displacement between cemented and cementless TKA at 10 years and to compare the 10-year migration to the 2-year data in an effort to validate the predictive modelling of RSA. Subjects who had previously participated in RSA migration studies with 2-year follow-up were recruited to return for a long-term follow-up exam, at least 10 years from their surgery. The implants under study included two cemented designs from two manufacturers and one porous metal monoblock cementless design. At the 10-year visit, subjects had supine RSA exams to determine long-term migration as well as a loaded exam (single leg stance) to determine inducible displacement. Differences between cemented and cementless groups were evaluated with the Mann Whitney U test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for early and late migrations. Significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Methods
Hydroxyapatite coatings for uncemented fixation in total knee
arthroplasty can theoretically provide a long-lasting biological
interface with the host bone. The objective of this study was to
test this hypothesis with propriety hydroxyapatite, peri-apatite,
coated tibial components using component migration measured with radiostereometric
analysis over two years as an indicator of long-term fixation. A total of 29 patients at two centres received uncemented PA-coated
tibial components and were followed for two years with radiostereometric
analysis exams to quantify the migration of the component.Aims
Patients and Methods
Satisfaction is increasingly employed as an outcome
measure for a successful total knee replacement (TKR). Satisfaction
as an outcome measure encompasses many different intrinsic and extrinsic
factors related to a person’s experience before and after TKR. The
Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry has previously demonstrated on
a large population study that 17% of TKR recipients are not satisfied
with their TKR outcome. This finding has been replicated in other
countries. Similar significant factors emerged from these registry
studies that are related to satisfaction. It would appear that satisfaction
is better after more chronic diseases and whether the TKR results
in pain relief or improved function. Importantly, unmet pre-operative
expectations are a significant predictor for dissatisfaction following
a TKR. It may be possible to improve rates by addressing the issues
surrounding pain, function and expectation before embarking on surgery. Cite this article:
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry (SKAR) has recorded knee arthroplasties prospectively in Sweden since 1975. The only outcome measure available to date has been revision status. While questionnaires on health outcome may function as more comprehensive endpoints, it is unclear which are the most appropriate. We tested various outcome questionnaires in order to determine which is the best for patients who have had knee arthroplasty as applied in a cross-sectional, discriminative, postal survey. Four general health questionnaires (NHP, SF-12, SF-36 and SIP) and three disease/site-specific questionnaires (Lequesne, Oxford-12, and WOMAC) were tested on 3600 patients randomly selected from the SKAR. Differences were found between questionnaires in response rate, time required for completion, the need for assistance, the efficiency of completion, the validity of the content and the reliability. The mean overall ranks for each questionnaire were generated. The SF-12 ranked the best for the general health, and the Oxford-12 for the disease/site-specific questionnaires. These two questionnaires could therefore be recommended as the most appropriate for use with a large knee arthroplasty database in a cross-sectional population.
