header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 60 - 60
1 Dec 2013
Frisch N Charters M Wessell N Sikora-Klak J Dobson C Yu S Silverton C Laker M Les C
Full Access

Purpose:

Starting February 2012, our institution changed from enoxaparin (Lovenox) to the Factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban (Xarelto) for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to compare rates of venous thromboembolism and rates of major bleeding between these two medications when used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after primary THA and TKA.

Methods:

A retrospective review was performed on 1795 patients who underwent THA or TKA at our institution between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012. Patients were excluded if they had a bilateral procedure, partial arthroplasty (hip hemiarthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), revision surgery, and cases designated as complex. Patients were excluded if they were on other anticoagulants (dabigatran, aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, heparin, fondaparinux), or if pre-operative creatinine was 1.2 or greater. After excluding these patients, there were 1089 patients included in the study. Chart review recorded demographics (age, gender), comorbidities (BMI, ASA, creatinine), surgery performed (primary THA or TKA), length of stay (LOS), venous thromboembolic events (deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolus [PE]), post-operative infections, and major bleeding events (stroke, post-operative bleeding requiring transfusion). Periprosthetic infection rates are also currently being reviewed. T-tests were used to compare continuous variables between treatment groups, and Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables between treatment groups (α = 0.05).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1041 - 1046
1 Sep 2004
Porter DE Lonie L Fraser M Dobson-Stone C Porter JR Monaco AP Simpson AHRW

We performed a prospective genotype-phenotype study using molecular screening and clinical assessment to compare the severity of disease and the risk of sarcoma in 172 individuals (78 families) with hereditary multiple exostoses. We calculated the severity of disease including stature, number of exostoses, number of surgical procedures that were necessary, deformity and functional parameters and used molecular techniques to identify the genetic mutations in affected individuals. Each arm of the genotype-phenotype study was blind to the outcome of the other. Mutations EXT1 and EXT2 were almost equally common, and were identified in 83% of individuals. Non-parametric statistical tests were used.

There was a wide variation in the severity of disease. Children under ten years of age had fewer exostoses, consistent with the known age-related penetrance of this condition. The severity of the disease did not differ significantly with gender and was very variable within any given family. The sites of mutation affected the severity of disease with patients with EXT1 mutations having a significantly worse condition than those with EXT2 mutations in three of five parameters of severity (stature, deformity and functional parameters). A single sarcoma developed in an EXT2 mutation carrier, compared with seven in EXT1 mutation carriers. There was no evidence that sarcomas arose more commonly in families in whom the disease was more severe.

The sarcoma risk in EXT1 carriers is similar to the risk of breast cancer in an older population subjected to breast-screening, suggesting that a role for regular screening in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses is justifiable.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 42 - 42
1 Jan 2003
Porter DE Fraser M Dobson-Stone C Monaco AM Simpson AHRW
Full Access

To determine whether the spectrum of genetic mutation in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses supports a neoplastic aetiology for this condition.

Historically, experts have been cautious in attributing neoplastic qualities to the osteochondroma. Solomon states ‘[osteochondromas] are not neoplastic in the ordinary sense of the word’; Morton that it ‘is not a tumour but a growth-aberration; Peterson that the ‘osteochondroma is not a true neoplasm’; and Schmale that ‘exostoses are the result of dysplasia of the lateral apect of the growth-plate’. There are, however, several features of osteochondroma behaviour common to other neoplasms which suggest a neoplastic aetiology:

the existence of an autosomal dominant inherited multiple form, in which lesions are histologically identical to the solitary form.

lesions which are distributed randomly and perhaps asymmetrically at ‘high-risk’ anatomical sites (usually adjacent to those physes with greatest growth potential).

evidence of behavioural or cellular disorder.

a potential for malignant transformation.

Recent genetic data has supported a fresh look at the neoplastic nature of osteochondromas. EXT1 and EXT2 genes are responsible for Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME). EXT1 codes for a protein which alters the synthesis and display of cell-surface heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycans; molecules which affect cellular growth, differentiation, motility and adhesion. Loss-of-function of such a gene may initiate a neoplastic pathogenesis in osteochondromas.

From 1996–1999, 51 families with HME were screened for EXT mutation, with mutations identified in 41 families. EXT mutation was assessed by means of fluorescent single-strand conformational polymorphism (f-SSCP) screening, followed by sequencing analysis.

Results : All missense mutations had previously been reported in the literature. In contrast, only 9 of 34 loss-of function mutations (frame-shift, splice-site and nonsense) had previously been reported.

All frame-shift, splice-site and nonsense mutations are loss-of-function. Missense mutations may result in partial or complete dysfunction if a crucial folding or binding site is involved. Since no missense mutations were new, this suggested their mutation sites are important, and may effectively result in loss-of-function. These data strongly support a tumour suppressor gene function for EXT genes, and a neoplastic pathogenesis for HME.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 50 - 51
1 Jan 2003
Porter D Fraser M Dobson-Stone C Monaco A Simpson A
Full Access

To identify if disease severity and cancer-risk might depend on genotype in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME).

The discovery that the EXT family of tumour suppressor genes is responsible for Hereditary Multiple Exostoses (HME) now enables correlation of clinical features with genetic defects. Genetic epidemiological studies, such as this, may provide additional data of use to the clinician. In most population-based HME cohorts, the incidence of sarcomatous degeneration has been estimated as 1–5%. This is not high, but occurs at a younger age (on average 2–3 decades younger) than chondrosarcoma in the general population. Genetic stratification might allow a very high-risk subgroup to be identified, within which surveillance for neoplastic change in osteochondromas could be concentrated.

In a pilot study, 29 affected individuals from 17 families with HME were screened for EXT mutation, with mutations identified in 12 families. Pedigrees were obtained and a complete assessment of disease severity made. We have since expanded this cohort; a further 71 affected individuals from 34 families with HME have provided detailed pedigree data and undergone a simple clinical examination to assess number of palpable osteo-chondromas. EXT mutation was assessed by means of fluorescent single-strand conformational polymorphism (f-SSCP) screening, followed by sequencing analysis.

Validation of clinical examination : In those who underwent radiographic examination for clinical purposes, number of palpable osteochondromas correlated strongly with number seen on radiographs at 146 anatomical sites (r= 0.814, p< 0.001), validating the usefulness of clinical examination in a population analysis, and negating the need for a radiographic skeletal survey in individuals at risk from malignant change.

EXT mutation : EXT mutation detection rates for f-SSCP were calculated to be 93%. As suggested in the pilot study, most (84%) were loss-of-function mutations. 60% had not previously been reported in the literature. There were 42 individuals with EXT1 and 29 with EXT2 mutations.

Disease severity and EXT mutation: In the pilot study, median number of palpable osteochondromas were about twice as frequent in the 7 families with EXT1 mutation than in the 5 families with EXT2 mutation (p< 0.05). This was also reflected in overall disease severity scores. In the larger follow-up study, individuals with EXT1 mutation had a median number of 32 osteochondromas, compared with 16 osteochondromas in those with EXT2 mutation (Wilcoxon rank sum test p< 0.0005).

Cancer risk: Six chondrosarcomas occurred, and were only found in individuals with EXT1 mutation.

The observation that osteochondromas are more frequent in patients with EXT1 than EXT2 mutations is an important message in genetic counselling. If disease severity and cancer risk is greater in individuals with EXT1 mutation, screening for neoplastic change might be targeted on this group, in which lifetime risk of malignant change in osteochondromas could be increased to between 5% and 10%.