In recent years, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has become a standard approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). With the increasing use of the DAA in primary cases also more and more revision surgeries are performed through the same interval. With ability to extend the DAA interval proximally and distally, loose cups, loose stems, and even periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) can be treated. Especially, PPF are devastating complications causing functional limitations and increased mortality. Therefore, we conducted a study to report the outcome of surgical treatment of PPF with the DAA interval.

We report on the one year complications and mortality in 40 cases with a mean clinical follow-up of 1.5 years. Mean age of patients was 74.3 years. Fractures were classified as Vancouver B2 (36), and B3 (N=4). In 14 cases, a standard stem was used, and in 26 cases a modular revision stem. In 30 cases, a distal extension +/- tensor release was used, in 4 cases a proximal tensor release was done, and in the remaining 6 cases revision could be performed without extension of the approach.

Median cut/suture time was 152 minutes (IQR 80 – 279). The overall complication rate in our patient group was 12.5%. 2 patients died in the first three months after operation. One patient had a transient femoral nerve palsy, which completely recovered.

The DAA interval to the hip for the treatment of PFF showed similar results compared with other approaches regarding mortality, complications, fracture healing, dislocation rate and clinical results. We conclude that femoral revision in case of PPF in the DAA interval is a safe and reliable procedure. Each Vancouver type of periprosthetic fracture can be treated by use of this approach.

We aimed to investigate the clinical consequences of intraoperative acetabular fractures. Between 2003 and 2012, a total of 3391 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THA) were performed at the Dept. of Orthopaedics, Innsbruck Medical University. Of those, a total of 160 patients underwent a CT scan within 30 days postoperatively. The scans of 44 patients were not suitable for analyse due to thick scan layers. Of the remaining 116 patients, 76 had a fracture. Reasons for CT-scans were suspected bleeding, hip pain, abdominal symptoms, etc.

The fractures included 59 isolated acetabular fractures, the rest of fractures was in the superior or inferior pubic ramus or the tuber ischiadicum.

Four cases out of the 59 acetabular fractures underwent revision surgery due to periprosthetic joint infection after 0, 2, 10 and 23 months. Four patients underwent revision due to cup loosening after 13 and 14 days as well as after 16 and 24 months. Of those, three showed a central acetabular fracture with protrusion.

In 33 of the remaining 51 patients, a minimum of 3 x-rays was available for migration analysis with EBRA. In 6 patients, the x-rays were not comparable to each other. The 27 remaining acetabular fractures were categorised according to AO classification in 62A1 (1; posterior wall), 62A2 (16; posterior column), 62A3 (6; anterior wall), and others (4). Four hips showed initial migration of more than 3 mm in the first 6 months. One had a central fracture, and was lost for follow-up after 8 months. Two had an anterior column fracture and showed no further migration after 6 months. One showed also a radiolucency of more than 2 mm in all 3 zones and was lost for follow-up.

We conclude that intraoperative acetabular fractures occur more often than we expected. Fractures of the acetabular ring involving one column do not seem to compromise the long-term stability of the implant. Central fractures required revision or showed loosening proved by high cup migration.