Our aim was to review the short-term clinical results of a single-institution cohort undergoing opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

We undertook a prospective clinical and radiographic review of our cohort of patients who had undergone opening wedge HTO for varus malalignment. The Cincinnati scoring system was used for objective assessment. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were evaluated and Blackburne-Peel (BP) and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratios recorded, as well as integrity of the lateral hinge.

We reviewed 55 knees (51 patients: 34 men and 17 women; mean age, 44.2years; range 34–58years) followed up for a minimum 12 months (range, 12–62months). All patients had relief of pain, but six met our criteria of failed treatment where either revision fixation was required or proceeded to total knee arthroplasty for persisting symptoms. Cincinnati scores were 94.5% excellent (52/55) and 5.5% good (3/55) at 1 year, whilst at last follow-up they were 87.2% excellent (48/55), 9.1% good (5/55) and 3.6% fair (2/55). There was a significant improvement in mean American Knee Society score at 1 year and maintained at last follow-up (p< 0.05). Radiographically the lateral hinge was noted to be breached in 9.1% (5/55), but no incidence of non-union was identified. There was no significant change in IS index, however BP index diminished by a mean 15.3% (range, 7.4–28.2%). Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy results in patellar infera, but successful clinical and functional outcomes have been demonstrated. The fact ther e is inconsistency between the two indices assessing patellar height ratio we believe reflects the inherent variability in the techniques employed. Distalisation of the tibial tubercle will mean the IS ratio remains unaffected, whilst the BP index more accurately demonstrates the lowering of patella relative to the joint line. However there may be other factors which are not immediately appreciated, such as changes in the tibial inclination or antero-posterior translation.

Our aim was to review the short-term clinical results of a single-institution cohort undergoing opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

We undertook a prospective clinical and radiographic review of our cohort of patients who had undergone opening wedge HTO for varus malalignment. The Cincinnati scoring system was used for objective assessment. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were evaluated and Blackburne-Peel (BP) and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratios recorded, as well as integrity of the lateral hinge.

We reviewed 55 knees (51 patients: 34 men and 17 women; mean age, 44.2years; range 34–58years) followed up for a minimum 12 months (range, 12–62months). All patients had relief of pain, but six met our criteria of failed treatment where either revision fixation was required or proceeded to total knee arthroplasty for persisting symptoms. Cincinnati scores were 94.5% excellent (52/55) and 5.5% good (3/55) at 1 year, whilst at last follow-up they were 87.2% excellent (48/55), 9.1% good (5/55) and 3.6% fair (2/55). There was a significant improvement in mean American Knee Society score at 1 year and maintained at last follow-up (p< 0.05). Radiographically the lateral hinge was noted to be breached in 9.1% (5/55), but no incidence of non-union was identified. There was no significant change in IS index, however BP index diminished by a mean 15.3% (range, 7.4–28.2%). Opening wedge HTO provides a means of relieving stress distribution through the medial tibiofemoral compartment and results in effective relief of symptoms with improvement in functional outcome and quality of life.

Aim: To review the short-term clinical results of a single-institution cohort undergoing opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO).

Method: We undertook a prospective clinical and radiographic review of our cohort of patients who had undergone opening wedge HTO for varus malalignment. The Cincinnati scoring system was used for objective assessment. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were evaluated and Blackburne-Peel (BP) and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratios recorded, as well as integrity of the lateral hinge.

Results: we reviewed 55 knees (51 patients: 34 men and 17 women; mean age, 44.2 years; range 34–58 years) followed up for a minimum 12 months (range, 12–62 months). All patients had relief of pain, but six met our criteria of failed treatment where either revision fixation was required or proceeded to total knee arthroplasty for persisting symptoms. Cincinnati scores were 94.5% excellent (52/55) and 5.5% good (3/55) at 1 year, whilst at last follow-up they were 87.2% excellent (48/55), 9.1% good (5/55) and 3.6% fair (2/55). There was a significant improvement in mean American Knee Society score at 1 year and maintained at last follow-up (p< 0.05). Radiographically the lateral hinge was noted to be breached in 9.1% (5/55), but no incidence of non-union was identified. There was no significant change in IS index, however BP index diminished by a mean 15.3% (range, 7.4–28.2%).

Discussion: Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy results in patellar infera, but successful clinical and functional outcomes have been demonstrated. The fact there is inconsistency between the two indices assessing patellar height ratio we believe reflects the inherent variability in the techniques employed. Distalisation of the tibial tubercle will mean the IS ratio remains unaffected, whilst the BP index more accurately demonstrates the lowering of patella relative to the joint line. However there may be other factors which are not immediately appreciated, such as changes in the tibial inclination or antero-posterior translation.

We report a case which highlights the progression of osteofibrous dysplasia to adamantinoma and questions whether intralesional curettage is the appropriate treatment. The role of a joint-sparing massive endoprosthesis using cortical fixation is demonstrated and we describe a unique biomedical design which resulted in the manufacture of an end cap to allow amputation through a custom-made proximal tibial replacement, rather than an above-knee amputation following recurrence.

Introduction: The results of treatment of Achilles tendinopathy are described in the sporting community little is known of the long-term results in the general population. Our aim was to assess these results in a district general hospital setting.

Materials/Methods: Patients who had undergone treatment for Achilles tendinopathy were identified from hospital records and assessed by postal questionnaire. This consisted of two parts (the VISA-A and a section about occupation, duration of symptoms prior to referral, prior sporting activities, and satisfaction). This was sent out with a stamped addressed return envelope, in the case of non-reply this was followed by a second one, and finally the patient was contacted by phone. Clinical notes of responders were reviewed.

Results: 71 patients were identified and the response rate was 83% with an equal, male to female split. Average age was 45; mean time to follow up was 8 years. Patients had undergone a wide variety of treatments (73% physiotherapy, 45% heel raises, 24% steroid injection {there were no ruptures reported}, and 12% operative). Duration of symptoms prior to referral ranged from 2 weeks to 27yrs. 78% were very satisfied or satisfied. 46% undertook sport prior to onset of symptoms, and at the time of follow up 40% undertook sport. 81% did not change their occupation. Average VISA-A score was 50 (range 10–90).

Discussion: Despite an average VISA-A score of 50 (excellent 90–100, good 75–85, fair 60–70, poor< 50), after a follow period up of 8 years, most patients were satisfied with the treatment they had received. We could find no correlation between treatment and eventual outcome.

Conclusion: Patients generally have continued symptoms from their Achilles Tendinopathy, many years later, despite standard treatments, which is reflected in poor VISA-A scores.

Study design: A prospective comparison of MRI findings with surgical findings in patients presenting to our spinal triage service with a prospective diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation.

Objective: To investigate consistency between radiologists interpretation of MRI scans, and comparison between MRI and surgical findings, in an attempt to identify those patients suitable for percutaneous treatment.

Background: MRI has assumed a preeminent position in the diagnosis of lumbar disc prolapse.

Methods: 87 consecutive patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of a lumbar disc prolapse that underwent an MRI and based on that a discectomy.

Results: Reliability tests show only fair agreement (k=0.36) between the radiologists and at best only moderate agreement (k=0.41) between the radiologists and surgical findings.

Conclusions: MRI is an excellent tool for diagnosis of a disc prolapse but does not appear to help in classifying discs suitable for percutaneous treatment.

Study design: A prospective comparison of MRI findings with surgical findings in patients presenting to our spinal triage service with a prospective diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation.

Objective: To investigate consistency between Radiologists’ interpretation of MRI scans, and comparison between MRI and surgical findings, in an attempt to identify those patients suitable for percutaneous treatment.

Background: MRI has assumed a pre-eminent position in the diagnosis of lumbar disc prolapse.

Methods: 87 consecutive patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of a lumbar disc prolapse that underwent an MRI and based on that a discectomy.

Results Reliability tests show only fair agreement (k=0.36) between the Radiologists and at best only moderate agreement (=0.41) between the Radiologists and surgical findings.

Conclusion: MRI is an excellent tool for diagnosis of a disc prolapse. MRI is poor at defining the character of a disc prolapse, and does not appear to help in classifying discs suitable for percutaneous treatment.