header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 19 - 19
1 May 2016
Halloran J Zadzilka J Colbrunn R Bonner T Anderson C Klika A Barsoum W
Full Access

Introduction

Improper soft-tissue balancing can result in postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may lead to early revision. A single-use tibial insert trial with embedded sensor technology (VERASENSE from OrthoSensor Inc., Dania Beach, FL) was designed to provide feedback to the surgeon intraoperatively, with the goal to achieve a “well-balanced” knee throughout the range of motion (Roche et al. 2014). The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of common soft-tissue releases as they related to sensor measured joint reactions and kinematics.

Methods

Robotic testing was performed using four fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens implanted with appropriately sized instrumented trial implants (geometry based on a currently available TKA system). Sensor outputs included the locations and magnitudes of medial and lateral reaction forces. As a measure of tibiofemoral joint kinematics, medial and lateral reaction locations were resolved to femoral anterior-posterior displacement and internal-external tibial rotation (Fig 1.). Laxity style joint loading included discrete applications of ± 100 N A-P, ± 3 N/m I-E and ± 5 N/m varus-valgus (V-V) loads, each applied at 10, 45, and 90° of flexion. All tests included 20 N of compressive force. Laxity tests were performed before and after a specified series of soft-tissue releases, which included complete transection of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), and the popliteus ligament (Table 1). Sensor outputs were recorded for each quasi-static test. Statistical results were quantified using regression formulas that related sensor outputs (reaction loads and kinematics) as a function of tissue release across all loading conditions. Significance was set for p-values ≤ 0.05.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 18 - 18
1 May 2016
Halloran J Colbrunn R Anderson C
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the relationship between knee specific tissue behavior and joint contact mechanics remains an area of focus. Seminal work from 1990's established the possibility to optimize tissue properties for recreation of laxity driven kinematics (Mommersteeg et al., 1996). Yet, the uniqueness and validity of such predictions could be strengthened, especially as they relate to joint contact conditions. Understanding this interplay has implications for the long term performance of joint replacements.

Development of instrumented knee implants, highlighted by a single use tibial insert trial with embedded sensor technology (VERASENSE, Orthosensor Inc.), may offer an avenue to establish the relationship between tissue state and joint mechanics. Utilization of related data also has the potential to confirm computational predictions, where both rigid body motions and associated reactions are explicitly accounted for. Hence, the goal of this work was to evaluate an approach for optimization of ligament properties using joint mechanics data from an instrumented implant during laxity style testing. Such a framework could be used to inform joint balancing techniques, improve long term implant performance, and alternatively, qualify factors that may lead to poor outcomes

METHODS

Experimentation was performed on a 52 year old male, left, cadaveric specimen. Joint arthroplasty was performed using standard practice by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. To mimic passive intraoperative loading, laxity loading at 10°, 45° and 90° flexion, which consisted of discrete application of anterior-posterior (± 100N), varus-valgus (± 5 Nm) and internal-external (± 3 Nm) loads at each angle, was performed using a simVITROTM robotic musculoskeletal simulator (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH). Experimental results included relative tibiofemoral kinematics and sensor measured metrics (Fig 1).

The finite element model was developed from specimen-specific MRIs and solved using Abaqus/Explicit. The model included the rigid bones, appropriately placed implants and relevant soft-tissue structures (Fig. 1). Ligament stiffness values were adopted from the literature and included a 6% strain toe region. Sets of nonlinear springs, defined using MR imaging, comprised each ligament/bundle. Optimization was performed, which minimized the root mean squared difference between VERASENSE measured tibiofemoral mechanics and the model predicted values. Ligament slack lengths were the control variables and the objective included each loading state and all contact metrics (θ, AFD, ML, and LL).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 268 - 268
1 Dec 2013
Colbrunn R Bonner T Barsoum W Halloran J
Full Access

Introduction

Experimental testing reproducing activity specific joint-level loading has the potential to quantify structure-function relationships, evaluate intervention possibilities, perform device analysis, and quantify joint kinematics. Many recent technological advancements have been made in this field and inspire this study's aim to present a framework for the application of activity dependent tibiofemoral loading in a specific custom developed 6 degree of freedom (DOF) robotic test frame. This study demonstrates a pipeline wherein kinetic and kinematic data from subjects were collected in a gait lab, analyzed through musculoskeletal modeling techniques, and applied to cadaveric specimens in the robotic testing system in a real-time manner. This pipeline (Figure 1 blue dotted region) fits into a framework for synergistic development and refinement of arthroplasty techniques and devices.

Methods

Gait lab kinetic and kinematic data for walking was collected from 5 subjects. Subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling was performed to determine 6 DOF active component joint loading (OpenSim version 2.4, simtk.org). Kinetic profiles of the stance phase of gait were estimated and experimentally prescribed in a clinically relevant joint coordinate frame (as a function of time). Of note, knee flexion angle was the only kinematically applied DOF in the robotic testing system. Six fresh-frozen left cadaveric knee specimens (3 male, 3 female, age 49–70) were acquired. The specimens were rigidly secured to the robotic Universal Musculoskeletal Simulator (UMS) custom testing apparatus [1], which controlled joint loads with a real-time force feedback controller. Joint loads were scaled to 40% of predicted loads determined through modeling, because of system load capacity limitations and to prevent joint soft tissue damage potentially caused by additional loads without active muscle constraints. The loading profile for the walking activity was applied to each of the knees and the resulting kinematics were recorded. In addition, the force feedback controller performance was evaluated by calculating the root-mean-square (RMS) error between the desired and actual loads throughout these dynamic loading profiles.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 130 - 130
1 Mar 2013
Mutnal A Bottros J Colbrunn R Butler S( Klika A Barsoum W
Full Access

Background

The acetabular labrum is an essential stabilizer of the hip joint, imparting its greatest effect in extreme joint positions where the femoral head is disposed to subluxation and dislocation. However, its stabilizing value has proved difficult to quantify. The objective of the present study was to assess the contribution of the entire acetabular labrum to mechanical joint stability. We introduce a novel “dislocation potential test” that utilizes a dynamic, cadaveric, robotic model that functions in real-time under load-control parameters to map the joint space for low-displacement determination of stability, and quantify using the “stability index”.

Methods

Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips without labral tears were mounted to a six-degree-of-freedom robotic manipulator and studied in 2 distinct joint positions provocative for either anterior or posterior dislocation. Dislocation potential tests were run in 15° intervals, or sweep planes, about the face of the acetabulum. For each interval, a 100 N force vector was applied medially and swept laterally until dislocation occurred. Three-dimensional kinematic data from conditions with and without labrum were quantified using the stability index, which is the percentage of all directions a constant force can be applied within a given sweep plane while maintaining a stable joint.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 268 - 268
1 Jul 2011
Kaar S Fening S Jones M Colbrunn R Miniaci A
Full Access

Purpose: We hypothesized that glenohumeral joint stability will decrease with increasingly larger humeral head defects.

Method: Humeral head defects were created in 9 cadaveric shoulders to simulate Hill Sachs defects. Defects represented 1/8, 3/8, 5/8, and 7/8 of the radius of the humeral head. Secondary factors included abduction angles of 45 degrees and 90 degrees, and rotations of 40 degrees internal, neutral, and 40 degrees external. Specimens were tested at each defect size sequentially from smallest to largest and at each of 6 conditions for all abduction and rotation combinations. Using a 6 degree-of-freedom robot, the humeral head was translated at 0.5 mm per second until dislocation in the anteroinferior direction at 45 degrees to the horizontal glenoid axis.

Results: ANOVA demonstrated significant factors of rotation (p< 0.001) and defect size (p< 0.001). In 40 degrees external rotation, there was significant reduction of distance to dislocation compared with neutral and 40 degrees internal rotation (p< 0.001). The 5/8 and 7/8 radius osteotomies demonstrated decreased distance to dislocation compared to the intact state (p< 0.05 and p< 0.001 respectively). There was no difference found between abduction angles. Post hoc analysis determined significant differences for each arm position. There was decreased distance to dislocation at the 5/8 radius osteotomy at 40 degrees external rotation with 90 degrees of abduction (p< 0.05). For the 7/8 radius osteotomy at 90 degrees abduction, there was decrease distance to dislocation for neutral and 40 degrees external rotation (p< 0.001). For the same osteotomy at 45 degrees abduction, there was decreased distance to dislocation at 40 degrees external rotation (p< 0.001). With the humerus internally rotated, there was never a significant change in the distance to dislocation.

Conclusion: Glenohumeral stability decreases at a 5/8 radius defect and was most pronounced in 40 degrees external rotation and at 90 degrees abduction. At a 7/8 radius humeral defect, there was further decrease in stability at both neutral and external rotation. Internal rotation always maintained baseline glenohumeral stability.