Extensor mechanism and abductor reconstructions in total joint arthroplasty are problematic. Growing tendon into a metallic implant would have great reconstructive advantages. With the introduction of porous metal implants, it was hoped that tendons could be directly attached to implants. However, the effects of the porous metal structure on tissue growth and pore penetration is unknown. In this rat model, we investigated the effect of pore size on tendon repair fixation using printed titanium implants with differing pore sizes. There were four groups of six Sprague Dawley rats (n = 28) plus control (n=4). Implants had pore sizes of 400µm (n=8), 700µm (n=8), and 1000µm (n=8). An Achilles tendon defect was created, and the implant positioned and sutured between the cut ends. Harvest occurred at 12-weeks. Half the specimens underwent tensile load to failure testing, the other half fixed and processed for hard tissue analysis. Average load to failure was 72.6N for controls (SD 10.04), 29.95N for 400µm (SD 17.95), 55.08N for 700µm (SD 13.47), and 63.08N for 1000µm (SD 1.87). The load to failure was generally better in the larger pore sizes. Histological evaluation showed that there was fibrous tendon tissue within and around the implant material, with collagen fibers organized in bundles. This increases as the pore diameter increases. Printing titanium implants allows for precise determination of pore size and structure. Our results showed that tendon repair utilizing implants with 700µm and 1000µm pores exhibited similar load to failure as controls. Using a defined pore structure at the attachment points of tendons to implants may allow predictable tendon to implant reconstruction at the time of revision arthroplasty.
Computer-assisted hip navigation offers the potential for more accurate placement of hip components, which is important in avoiding dislocation, impingement, and edge-loading. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of computer-assisted hip navigation reduced the rate of dislocation in patients undergoing revision THA. We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients who underwent computer-navigated revision THA [Fig. 1] between January 2015 and December 2016. Demographic variables, indication for revision, type of procedure, and postoperative complications were collected for all patients. Clinical follow-up was performed at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Dislocations were defined as any episode that required closed or open reduction or a revision arthroplasty. Data are presented as percentages and was analyzed using appropriate comparative statistical tests (z-tests and independent samples t- tests).Introduction
Methods and Materials
The purpose of this study was to compare pre-operative acetabular cup parameters using this novel dynamic imaging sequence to the Lewinnek safe zone We retrospectively reviewed 350 consecutive primary THAs that underwent dynamic pre-operative acetabular cup planning utilizing a pre-operative CT scan to capture the individual's hip anatomy, followed by standing (posterior pelvic tilt), sitting (anterior pelvic tilt), and supine X-rays. Using these inputs, we modeled an optimal cup position for each patient. Radiographic parameters including inclination, anteversion, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar flexion were analyzed.Introduction
Methods
Standing spinal alignment has been the center of focus recently, particularly in the setting of adult spinal deformity. Humans spend approximately half of their waking life in a seated position. While lumbopelvic sagittal alignment has been shown to adapt from standing to sitting posture, segmental vertebral alignment of the entire spine is not yet fully understood, nor are the effects of DEGEN or DEFORMITY. Segmental spinal alignment between sitting and standing, and the effects of degeneration and deformity were analyzed. Segmental spinal alignment and lumbopelvic alignment (pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL, sacral slope) were analyzed. Lumbar spines were classified as NORMAL, DEGEN (at least one level of disc height loss >50%, facet arthropathy, or spondylolisthesis), or DEFORMITY (PI-LL mismatch>10°). Exclusion criteria included lumbar fusion/ankylosis, hip arthroplasty, and transitional lumbosacral anatomy. Independent samples t-tests analyzed lumbopelvic and segmental alignment between sitting and standing within groups. ANOVA assessed these differences between spine pathology groups.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Total joint arthroplasty is regarded as a highly successful procedure. However, patient outcomes and implant longevity require proper alignment and prosthesis position. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been found to improve the accuracy of component positioning and reduce rates of revision, however there remains debate whether it provides improvements in patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of our study was to compare PROs between computer-assisted and conventional TKA. A retrospective review of all total knee arthroplasty patients was conducted using a single institution's FORCE database for reporting PROs. Knee Society Score (KSS), procedure satisfaction, physical component summary (PCS), and mental component summary (MCS) were compared between computer-assisted TKA and conventional TKA.Introduction
Methods
Hip osteoarthritis (OA) results in reduced hip range of motion and contracture, affecting sitting and standing posture. Spinal pathology such as fusion or deformity may alter the ability to compensate for reduced joint mobility in sitting and standing postures. The effects of postural spinal alignment change between sitting and standing is not well understood. A retrospective radiographic review was performed at a single academic institution of patients with sitting and standing full-body radiographs between 2012 and 2017. Patients were excluded if they had transitional lumbosacral anatomy, prior spinal fusion or hip prosthesis. Hip OA severity was graded by the Kellgren-Lawrence grades and divided into two groups: low-grade OA (LOA; grade 0–2) and severe OA (SOA; grade 3–4). Spinopelvic parameters (Pelvic Incidence (PI), Pelvic Tilt (PT), Lumbar Lordosis (LL), and PI-LL), Thoracic Kyphosis (TK; T4-T12), Global spinal alignment (SVA and T1-Pelvic Angle; TPA; T10-L2) as well as proximal femoral shaft angle (PFSA: as measured from the vertical), and hip flexion (difference between change in PT and change in PFSA) were also measured. Changes in sit-stand radiographic parameters were compared between the LOA and SOA groups with unpaired t-test.Introduction
Methods
A comprehensive understanding of pelvic orientation prior to total hip arthroplasty is necessary to allow proper cup positioning and mitigate the risks of complications associated with component malpositioning. Measurements using anteroposterior (AP) radiographs have been described as effective means of accurately predicting pelvic orientation. The purpose of our study was to describe the inter- and intra-observer reliability and predictive accuracy of predicting pelvic tilt using AP radiographs. Five fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons independently analyzed pelvic tilt, within 10 degrees, for 50 different AP pelvis radiographs. All surgeons were blinded to patient information, diagnosis, and correct measurements prior to analysis. Responses were then compared to correct measurements using sitting-standing AP and lateral stereoradiographs.Introduction
Methods
