header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 291 - 292
1 Jul 2011
Agarwal A Agarwal A Chandra H Chaudhry A
Full Access

Arthritis may cause mild to moderate pain at rest, joint stiffness and varus or valgus deformity. This may prevent a person from working or prevent them from sitting cross-legged, squatting, climbing the stairs or walking distances. The role of osteotomy have been studied. One hundred cases were performed over a 5 year period and the results were evaluated.

There were 44 men and 56 women. The majority were sedentary workers. The majority of the patients had symptoms for between 1 and 2 years. Pain was mostly located on the medial side and there was no pre-operative feeling of instability. The pre-operative range of movement was between 90–120 degrees in 68% of cases.

In 20 cases, a dome osteotomy was performed. In 80 cases a wedge osteotomy: 75 cases were valgus osteotomy and 5 cases by varus osteotomy. All patients benefited from surgery as regards the relief of pain. Very old and obese patients showed poor results after surgery due to their inability to do the required physiotherapy. The patients having a shorter duration of symptoms showed greater radiographic improvement than those with a longer duration of symptoms.

The patients with 1–10 of postoperative valgus alignment obtained the most pain relief and a good range of motion. Over correction and failure to achieve valgus showed poor results. Overall, 52 % of patients showed good results, 35 % fair and 13% poor results.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 416 - 416
1 Sep 2009
Hull P Chaudhry A Gohil M Prasthofer A Pattison G
Full Access

Aims: To establish the best teaching method for medical students and ascertain the students’ preferred method of teaching.

Material and Methods: 30 medical students in were picked randomly and divided into two equal groups. Group 1 received Standard bedside teaching and Group 2 watched an interactive DVD. Each group then undertook a validated OSCE and the examiners were blinded as to which teaching method the students had received. The groups then received the other method of teaching followed by another OSCE. A questionnaire was given to all the students, to assess their satisfaction of the teaching session.

Results:

Conclusion: Interactive teaching method can be a useful technique for teaching medical students, however the students’ preferred method of teaching is standard bedside teaching. Efficiency of knowledge transfer can be improved if interactive teaching is followed by standard bed side teaching but not the other way around.