Revision surgery and surgery in previously operated areas are associated with an increased infection risk. In such situations, aggressive surgical debridement may be necessary to control and eradicate the infection. Full thickness defects resulting from such debridement present as a challenge. In most cases, an association of various methods, both surgical and non-surgical, is necessary. Our goal is to describe the use of vaccum dressings as an effective way to deal with extensive and infected dorsolumbar surgical defects, while avoiding the use of myocutaneous flaps. This is a retrospective and descriptive case report based on data from clinical records, patient observation and analysis of complementary exams. We present the case of a 57-years-old obese woman with prior history of double approach with posterior instrumentation and spine arthrodesis (D3 to L4) due to severe dorsolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. She presented to our consult 42 years after surgery, complaining of lower back pain. Clinical observation and imaging exams demonstrated degenerative disc disease in L5-S1 and L5 anterolisthesis. There was also distal instrumentation breakage (right L4 pedicular screw and contralateral rod) with pseudarthrosis suspicion. Distal instrumentation was removed and no pseudarthrosis was found. Therefore, posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis was performed, from L4 to S1. Surgery went without complications. One week after surgery, patient developed fever and inflammatory signs at the surgical incision, with purulent oozing. Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were identified as the causative agents. Decision was made to remove both lumbar and distal dorsal instrumentation and perform aggressive debridement and lavage, with debridement surgery being repeated twice. Finally, a full thickness defect with approximately 20cm long and 6cm wide resulted from the debridement. A vacuum dressing was then applied, for 5 weeks, with progressive decrease in clinical and analytical inflammatory parameters and wound closure. Four months after the initial surgery, patient was discharged with complete defect closure and reepithelialization. This dressing technique provided a sound solution for defect resolution, as well as an important aid for infection control. It proved to be a viable option in an extensive defect, when surgical flap techniques and traditional dressing techniques could not provide a complete solution.
Pressure ulcers are a common and recurrent clinical condition in paraplegic patients, requiring specialized equipment and care, as well as surgical interventions in order to treat them. This is especially true whenever and infection is declared, which will delay or impair ulcer epitelization. These surgical interventions require a good use of various myocutaneos flaps to cover all defects. Problem arises whenever there is not enough flap tissue to cover the entire ulcer, or when multiple surgeries to correct previous ulcers have already been performed. Our goal is to describe the use of a last resort surgical technique for covering infected pressure ulcers. This is a retrospective and descriptive case report based on data from clinical records, patient observation and analysis of complementary exams. We present the case of a 30-years-old man, paraplegic for 10 years due to motor vehicle accident with spinal cord injury. Since the accident, and although he used adapted equipment and pressure relief mattresses and wheelchair cushions, he developed recurrent, infected ulcers in the perineal and sacral area, being operated on for multiple times by the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) department, for surgical debridement and ulcer coverage with tensor faciae latae and hamstrings myocutaneous flaps. Despite all treatment, patient developed a stage IV perineal ulcer, which ranged from his left great trochanter to the right buttock, and a simultaneous stage IV sacral ulcer. Both ulcers were infected with meticilin-resistent Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), sensitive to vancomycin. The patient's left hip joint was also infected (due to a direct trajectory to the perineal ulcer) and subluxated (due to absence of soft tissue support). A multidisciplinary team assembled and decision was made to disarticulate the patient's left hip, debride and irrigate extensively the surgical site, and use a double gastrocnemius myocutaneous fillet flap in-continuity, in a surgical collaboration between the Orthopaedics and PRS department. This should provide satisfactory soft tissue ulcer coverage as well as facilitate antibiotics penetrance and infection eradication. Surgery went without complications and the patient healed uneventfully. He resumed unrestricted positioning for sitting and wheelchair mobilization. Now, at two years follow-up, the patient still has no recurrence of either the ulcer or the infection. This surgical technique provided robust soft tissue coverage for the ulcers, as well as an important aid for infection control. It proved to be a viable option in a paraplegic patient, when more traditional flap techniques can no longer be used and with a recurrent infection.
