header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIII | Pages 7 - 7
1 Jul 2012
Gupta S Gupta H Lomax A Carter R Mohammed A Meek R
Full Access

Raised blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risks such as myocardial infarction, stroke and arteriosclerosis. During surgery the haemodynamic effects of stress are closely monitored and stabilised by the anaesthetist. Although there have been many studies assessing the effects of intraoperative stress on the patient, little is known about the impact on the surgeon.

A prospective cohort study was carried out using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor to measure the BP and heart rates (HR) of three consultants and their respective trainees during hallux valgus, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Our principle aim was to assess the physiological effects of performing routine operations on the surgeon. We noted if there were any differences in the stress response of the lead surgeon, in comparison to when the same individual was assisting. In addition, we recorded the trainee's BP and HR when they were operating independently.

All of the surgeons had higher BP and HR readings on operating days compared to baseline. When the trainer was leading the operation, their BP gradually increased until implant placement, while their trainees remained stable. On the other hand, when the trainee was operating and the trainer assisting, the trainer's BP peaked at the beginning of the procedure, and slowly declined as it progressed. The trainee's BP remained elevated throughout. The highest peaks for trainees were noted during independent operating.

We conclude that all surgery is stressful, and that trainees are more likely to be killing themselves than their trainers.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVIII | Pages 18 - 18
1 Jun 2012
Gupta S Gupta H Lomax A Carter R Mohammed A Meek R
Full Access

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Raised blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risks such as myocardial infarction, stroke and arteriosclerosis. During surgery the haemodynamic effects of stress are closely monitored and stabilised by the anaesthetist. Although there have been many studies assessing the effects of intraoperative stress on the patient, little is known about the impact on the surgeon.

A prospective cohort study was carried out using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor to measure the BP and heart rates (HR) of three consultants and their respective trainees during hallux valgus, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Our principle aim was to assess the physiological effects of performing routine operations on the surgeon. We noted if there were any differences in the stress response of the lead surgeon, in comparison to when the same individual was assisting. In addition, we recorded the trainee's BP and HR when they were operating independently. The intraoperative measurements were compared with their baseline readings and their stress response, assessed using the Bruce protocol.

Many trends were noted in this pilot study. All of the surgeons had higher BP and HR readings on operating days compared to baseline. The physiological parameters normalised by one hour post-theatre list in all subjects. When the trainer was leading the operation, their BP gradually increased until implant placement, while their trainees remained stable. On the other hand, when the trainee was operating and the trainer assisting, the trainer's BP peaked at the beginning of the procedure, and slowly declined as it progressed. The trainee's BP remained elevated throughout. The highest peaks for trainees were noted during independent operating.

We conclude that all surgery is stressful, and that trainees are more likely to be killing themselves than their trainers.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 299 - 299
1 Jul 2008
Spencer S Carter R Murray H Meek R Grigoris P
Full Access

Introduction: Hip resurfacing is a popular alternative to total hip arthroplasty. It aims to provide more physiological loading of the proximal femur, avoiding stress shielding and associated bone resorption. However, finite element analysis of hip resurfacing systems suggests stress shielding occurs in the femoral neck below the prosthesis and theoretically may lead to femoral neck fracture. Nevertheless, recent DEXA studies indicate femoral bone stock preservation with no evidence of stress shielding. It is not yet known what actually occurs in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether femoral neck resorption occurs in one particular type of hip resurfacing post operatively and quantify the degree of narrowing.

Methods: Femoral neck resorption of the Cormet 2000 metal-on-metal resurfacing prosthesis (Corin, UK) was assessed by measuring the prosthesis-neck ratio on postoperative radiographs. 39 prostheses (35 patients) were measured on plain AP pelvis radiographs taken immediately and mean 2 years post-operatively. Subsequent follow up radiographs were measured up to maximum 7 years follow up, mean 4.75 years.

Results: There was evidence of neck atrophy in 35/39 hips at an average of 2 years post operation, with the overall average neck narrowing from a ratio of 0.86 to 0.81 at 2 years. Average neck ratios were calculated up to 7 years post resurfacing; 25 hips measured at 3 years average ratio of 0.81, 20 at 4 years ratio 0.8, 25 at 5 years ratio 0.8, 9 at 6 years ratio 0.8, 1 at 7 years ratio 0.81.

Discussion: A degree neck resorption occurs with this resurfacing prosthesis by 2 years, however no further resorption appears to occur beyond this, to a maximum follow up of 7 years. This may indicate that early narrowing is more likely to be due to harmless bone adaption then a progressive absorption jeopardising the femoral neck.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 66-B, Issue 5 | Pages 625 - 627
1 Nov 1984
Hamblen D Carter R