header advert
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 109 - 109
1 Feb 2012
McCarthy M Aylott C Brodie A Annesley-Williams D Jones A Grevitt M Bishop M
Full Access

We aimed (1) to determine the factors which influence outcome after surgery for CES and (2) to study CES MRI measurements. 56 patients with evidence of a sphincteric disturbance who underwent urgent surgery (1994-2002) were identified and invited to clinic. 31 MRIs were available for analysis and randomised with 19 MRIs of patients undergoing discectomy for persistent radiculopathy. Observers estimated the percentage of spinal canal compromise and indicated whether they thought the scan findings could produce CES and whether the discs looked degenerate. Measurements were repeated after two weeks.

(1) 42 patients attended (mean follow up 60 months; range 25–114). Mean age at onset was 41 years (range 24–67). 26 patients were operated on within 48 hours of onset. Acute onset of sphincteric symptoms and the time to operation did not influence the outcomes. Leg weakness at onset persisted in a significant number at follow-up (p<0.005). Bowel disturbance at presentation was associated with sexual problems (<0.005) at follow-up. Urinary disturbance at presentation did not affect the outcomes. The 13 patients who failed their post-operative trial without catheter had worse outcomes. The SF36 scores at follow-up were reduced compared to age-matched norms in the population. The mean ODI was 29, LBOS 42 and VAS 4.5.

(2) No significant correlations were found between MRI canal compromise and clinical outcome. There was moderate to substantial agreement for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility.

Conclusions

Due to small numbers we cannot make the conclusion that delay to surgery influences outcome. Based on the SF36, LBOS and ODI scores, patients who have had CES do not return to a normal status. Using MRI alone, the correct identification of CES has sensitivity 68%, specificity 80% positive predictive value 84% and negative predictive value 60%. CES occurs in degenerate discs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 568 - 568
1 Oct 2010
Swamy G Brodie A Calthorpe D Dua R
Full Access

Background: Better postoperative pain, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction have been reported using spinal anaesthesia when compared with general anaesthesia.

However, higher levels of urinary retention with spinal anaesthesia can lead to delayed discharge in microdiscectomy surgery.

Anecdotally, we believe that further improvements to patient satisfaction and a reduction in the need for urinary catheterisation can be found in patients receiving fentanyl intrathecally as opposed to morphine.

Methods: Seventy consecutive patients were recruited and prospectively randomised into two equal groups, with half the patients receiving intrathecal fentanyl with the spinal anaesthetic and the remainder receiving morphine.

A comprehensive post operative evaluation was carried out documenting any anaesthetic complications, post operative analgesic requirement, physiological and functional recovery, need for urinary catheterisation and patient satisfaction.

Results: Both groups were equally matched for age and gender. Mean age was 43 years in fentanyl group and 50 years in the morhhine group. All patients were discharged on day one post surgery. 3 patients in the fentanyl group and 11 patients in the morphine group required urinary catheterisation.

No intra-operative anaesthetic or surgical complications were noted.

Mean Visual Analogue score for pain was lower in the fentanyl group [2.46] compared to morphine group [2.70].

Conclusion: Lumbar spinal microdiscectomy can be safely performed as a short stay procedure under spinal anaesthesia using intrathecal fentanyl or morphine. Post-operative pain and functional out comes were comparable between the two groups but lower incidence of post-operative nausea, vomiting, itching and urinary catheterisation can be expected with use of fentanyl


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 213 - 213
1 May 2009
Brodie A Jones S Fernandes J Rajan R
Full Access

Aim: To assess the ease of use and reliability of PICC lines for the delivery of intravenous antibiotics in children with septic joints.

Method: Over a twelve month period 22 children with septic joints were prospectively recruited. All received open arthrotomy and washout prior to commencing antibiotic treatment. At the time of surgery, a PICC line was inserted. All children were given intravenous antibiotics for two weeks then oral antibiotics for four weeks. Inflammatory blood markers were reviewed regularly. Upon removal of the PICC line the tip was sent for microbiological testing.

Results: All 22 children made a full recovery with a minimum of twelve months follow up (range 12–20 months). All PICC line tips were negative for microbiological culture after 48 hours.

Conclusion: Peripheral cannulation for intravenous access in children can be challenging. Younger children have chubby limbs and often fragile veins. Even with the use of topical analgesics the procedure can be traumatic for a young child. A PICC line inserted at the time of the surgical washout of the infected joint seems an ideal solution. PICC lines are safe, reliable and allow for at least two weeks of intravenous access, avoiding the need for regular re-cannulation of children.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 218 - 219
1 May 2006
McCarthy M Brodie A Annesley-Williams D Aylott C Jones A Grevitt M
Full Access

Introduction: (1) Determine whether initial MRI findings correlate with clinical outcome.(2) Study the reproducibility of MRI measurements of large disc prolapses.(3) Estimate the ability to predict CES based on MRI alone.(4) Does CES only occur in degenerate discs?

Method: 31 patients with CES were identified and invited to attend clinic. 19 patients who underwent discectomy were identified. Digital photographs of all 50 MRIs were obtained. Observers: 1 Radiologist, 2 Spinal Surgeons and 1 Trainee did not know the number of patients in each group. Observers estimated the percentage spinal canal compromise on each view (0–100%), indicated whether they thought the scan findings could produce CES and commented on disc degeneration. Measurements were repeated after 2 weeks.

Results: 26 patients attended clinic – mean follow up 51 months (range 25–97). 12 of the 26 patients with CES had, on average, > 75% canal compromise. No significant correlations were found between MRI canal compromise and clinical outcome. Kappa values for intra-observer reproducibility of measurements ranged from 0.4–0.85 and inter-observer 0.63–5. Based on MRI, the correct identification of CES has sensitivity 68%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 84% and negative predictive value 58%. Over 80% of the CES causing discs were degenerate.

Discussion: Canal compromise does not appear to predict clinical outcome. MRI measurement reproducibility has substantial agreement. CES is a clinical diagnosis supported by an MRI scan. In less clear cases the presence of a large disc on an MRI scan supports a diagnosis of CES (PPV 84%). CES occurs in degenerate discs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 147 - 148
1 Mar 2006
McCarthy M Brodie A Aylott C Annesley-Williams D Jones A Grevitt M
Full Access

Introduction: Current evidence suggests that CES should be operated within 48 hours from onset of sphincteric symptoms in order to maximise chances of recovery. Measurement reproducibility of large disc prolapses and clinical correlations have not previously been studied.

Objectives: (1) Determine whether initial MRI findings correlate with clinical outcome (2) Study the reproducibility of MRI measurements of large disc prolapses (3) Estimate the ability to predict CES based on MRI alone.

Study Design: 31 patients with CES were identified, the case notes reviewed and the patients invited to attend clinic. Outcome consisted of history and examination, and several validated questionnaire assessments. 19 patients who underwent discectomy for persistent radiculopathy were identified. None had sphincteric symptoms. All had a significant surgical target. Digital photographs of all 50 MRIs were obtained showing the T2 mid-sagittal image and the axial image with the greatest disc protrusion. The Observers: 1 Consultant Radiologist, 2 Consultant Spinal Surgeons and 1 SHO did not know the number of patients in each group. Observers estimated the percentage spinal canal compromise on each view and indicated whether they thought the scan findings could produce CES. Measurements were repeated after 2 weeks.

Results: 26 patients attended clinic mean follow up 51 months (25 to 97). As expected, the % canal compromise differed significantly between the two groups (p0.001). 12 of the 26 patients with CES had, on average, over75% canal compromise. No significant correlations were found between MRI canal compromise and clinical outcome. Canal compromise did predict whether the patient would fail their Trial Without Catheter (p0.05). Based on MRI alone, the correct identification of CES has sensitivity 68%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 84% and negative predictive value 58%. Kappa values for intra-observer reproducibility ranged from 0.4 to 0.85 for sagittal compromise, axial compromise and correct prediction of CES. All three interobserver kappa values for these measurements were 0.64.

Conclusions: This is the largest radiological case series of CES with 4 years clinical follow up. Canal compromise on MRI does not appear to directly predict clinical outcome. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of large disc protrusions has substantial agreement. MRI could be of help in equivocal cases if the scan shows a large disc.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 148 - 148
1 Mar 2006
McCarthy M Brodie A Aylott C Annesley-Williams D Grevitt M Bishop M
Full Access

Objective: Determine factors influencing outcome after surgery for cauda equina syndrome with particular attention sphincteric recovery. Subjects:56 patients with evidence of a sphincteric disturbance who underwent urgent surgery between 1994 and 2002 were identified and invited for follow up.

Outcome Measures: History and examination, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 36, Visual Analogue Score, Low Back Outcome Score, Modified Somatic Perception Score, Modified Zung Depression Score, International Prostate Severity Score, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire and Sheffield Female Pelvic Floor Questionnaire.

Results: 42 patients attended with a mean follow up of 60 months (25 to 114 months). Mean age at onset was 41 years (24 to 67 years) with 23 males and 19 females. 25 patients had sudden onset of symptoms in less than 24 hours. 26 patients were operated on within 48 hours of onset. At presentation urinary retention was associated with acute onset of less than 24 hours (p0.01), leg weakness (p0.01), abnormal leg sensation (p0.05) and abnormal rectal tone (p0.05). Bilateral radiculopathy was associated with leg weakness (p0.005). All patients with abnormal rectal tone (21) had abnormal rectal sensation. At follow up significantly more females had urinary incontinence (p0.001) and bowel disturbance (p0.05), higher VAS scores (p0.05) and lower SF36 Pain and Energy scores (p0.05) than males. Urinary disturbance at presentation did not affect the outcomes. Bowel disturbance at presentation was associated with sexual problems (0.005) and abnormal rectal tone (p0.05) at follow up. Objective reduced perianal sensation at onset persisted in a significant number at follow up (21/32 patients; p0.05) as did leg weakness (14/23; p0.005). There was a weak association between delay to operation and bowel disturbance (p0.05) at follow up. Eight patients had faecal soiling and faecal incontinence at follow up and this was associated with sudden onset of symptoms, initial abnormal rectal tone and time to operation (p0.05). The SF36 scores at follow up were reduced compared to age matched norms in the population. The mean ODI was 29, LBOS 42 and VAS 4.5.

Conclusions: In our series the duration of symptoms and speed of onset prior to surgery appears to influence bowel but not bladder outcome two years after surgery. Based on the SF36, LBOS and ODI scores, patients who have had CES do not return to a normal status. Patient counselling about this would therefore be appropriate.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 210 - 210
1 Apr 2005
McCarthy M Annesley-Williams D Brodie A Jones A Grevitt M
Full Access

Introduction: Current evidence suggests CES should be operated < 48 hours from onset. MRI scanning is often not available 24 hours a day.

Objectives: (1) Determine whether MRI findings correlate with clinical outcome. (2) Study the reproducibility of MRI measurements of large disc prolapses. (3) Estimate the ability to predict CES based on MRI alone.

Study Design: 31 CES patients were identified,contactedand invited to follow up. Clinical outcome consisted of history and examination, and validated questionnaire assessments. 19 patients who underwent discectomy were identified. T2 mid-sagittal and axial digital photographs of all 50 MRIs were obtained. Observers did not know the number of patients in each group (1 Consultant Radiologist, 2 Consultant Spinal Surgeons and 1 SHO). They estimated the percentage spinal canal compromise on each view (0–100%) and indicated whether they thought the scan findings could produce CES. Measurements were repeated after 2 weeks.

Results: 26 patients attended clinic (mean follow up 51 months). There were no significant correlations found between MRI canal compromise and clinical outcome. Kappa values for the measurements ranged 0.52–0.85 and 0.61–0.75 for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Based on MRI alone correct identification of CES has sensitivity 67%, specificity 81%, positive predictive value 85% and negative predictive value 60%.

Conclusions: Canal compromise on MRI does not predict the outcome of patients with CES. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of large disc protrusions has substantial agreement. MRI could be of help in equivocal cases if the scan shows a large disc.