We systematically reviewed the published literature
on the complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy for
the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Publications
were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and
CINAHL databases up to February 2012. We assessed randomised (RCTs), controlled
group clinical (CCTs) trials, case series in publications associated
with closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia in patients with osteoarthritis
of the knee and finally a Cochrane review. Many of these trials
included comparative studies (opening wedge
In this review, we present the data of one of the largest non-designer, mid- to long-term follow-ups of the AGC carried out by surgeons of differing grades and sub-specialty. We present a total of 1538 AGC knees during a 15 year period, of which 902 were followed up by postal or telephone questionnaire focused on Oxford Knee Scores, Visual analogues of function and pain and survival analyses performed. 85.7% of patients had an Oxford knee score of between 0 and 40, with 71.2% scoring between 0 - 30. 65.6% of patients responded with a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) of 0 or 1 at rest (minimum pain = 0) and 53.9% reporting VA scores of 0 or 1 while walking. 87.5% of patients reported Excellent or good functional reports at final follow up and 90.3% reporting excellent or good pain control compared to per-operative levels. There is a survivorship of 95.88% at 15years. This large cohort and multi-surgeon & multi-experience level trial reproduces the excellent results as demonstrated by the designer centre (Ritter et al.) and is better than most others in the literature. Mid to long term outcome shows excellent function and analgesia. Complication rates are low and the necessity for revision remains low.Purpose of Study
Summary of methods and Results
