Recent advances in polyethylene and ceramic technologies has allowed us to use larger size heads without compromising the wear properties of a THR. One benefit of this change has been proposed to be a lower incidence of dislocation. This is a retrospective study looking at the effect of using large heads in our patient population.

We retrospectively evaluated the dislocation rate in 913 THR's performed using the same standardized surgical technique employed by a single team of surgeons at our institution between 1995 and 2015. Patients were assigned to two groups: small (28 mm and smaller) (SH), large diameter heads (36 mm and larger) (LH). The cup position was measured and plotted to determine its status according to the Lewinnek safe zone (15°±10° for anteversion, 40°±10° for inclination).

Sixteen of the 472 SH dislocated (3.4 percent) while 5 of the 441 LH group (1.1 percent) (P=0.04). In all of the LH patients that dislocated the cup position was in the safe range of Lewinnek. However, in the LH group only 65 percent of the cups were in the safe zone.

Using the same surgical approach by changing the head size to 36 mm and larger, we were able decrease the dislocation rate significantly. Errors of cup positioning according to Lewinnek became oblivious when using large heads compared to small heads. In our opinion, using large heads in total hip arthroplasty makes a difference in terms of dislocation.

We have reviewed 54 patients who had undergone 61 total hip replacements using bulk femoral autografts to augment a congenitally dysplastic acetabulum. There were 52 women and two men with a mean age of 42.4 years (29 to 76) at the time of the index operation. A variety of different prostheses was used: 28 (45.9%) were cemented and 33 (54.1%) uncemented. The graft technique remained unchanged throughout the series.

Follow-up was at a mean of 8.3 years (3 to 20). The Hospital for Special Surgery hip score improved from a mean of 10.7 (4 to 18) pre-operatively to a mean of 35 (28 to 38) at follow-up.

The position of the acetabular component was anatomical in 37 hips (60.7%), displaced less than 1 cm in 20 (32.7%) and displaced more than 1 cm in four (6.6%). Its cover was between 50% and 75% in 34 hips (55.7%) and less than 50% in 25 (41%). In two cases (3.3%), it was more than 75%.

There was no graft resorption in 36 hips (59%), mild resorption in 21 (34%) and severe resorption in four (6%).

Six hips (9.8%) were revised for aseptic loosening. The overall rate of loosening and revision was 14.8%. Overall survival at 8.3 years was 93.4%.

The only significant factor which predicted failure was the implantation of the acetabular component more than 1 cm from the anatomical centre of rotation of the hip.