The number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed per year is increasing for reasons that are not fully explained by a growing and aging population. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of patient health status as an indication for surgery and determine if patients are undergoing surgery at a better health status than in the past. To examine how pre-operative functional health status has changed over time, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Health status was assessed using the physical component summary (PCS) score from the 36-item short-form (SF-36) health survey. Only primary procedures were included; revisions were excluded. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers with conflicts resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Meta-regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of time, patient age, and gender. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences between countries.Introduction
Methods
Gluteus medius is disrupted during lateral approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) which may impact its function and ability to control the pelvis. The objective was to compare gluteus medius activation and joint mechanics associated with a Trendelenburg sign (pelvic drop, trunk lean) during gait and hip abductor strength between patients that underwent lateral or posterior THA approaches one year post-surgery and healthy adults. Participants that underwent primary THA for hip osteoarthritis using lateral (n=21) or posterior (n=21) approaches, and healthy adults (n=21) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Participants completed five walking trials. Surface electromyography captured gluteus medius activation. A 3-dimensional optical motion capture system measured frontal plane pelvic obliquity and lateral trunk lean angles. Participants performed maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) on a dynamometer to measure hip abductor torque. Characteristics from gait waveforms were identified using principal component analysis, and participant waveforms were scored against these characteristics to produce principal component scores. One-way analysis of variance and effect sizes (d) compared gait principal component scores and isometric hip abductor torque between groups.Introduction
Methods
