header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 227 - 227
1 Dec 2013
Amanatullah D Lopez M Alaia M Montini K DiCesare P Pereira G
Full Access

Restoration of the joint line of the knee during primary and revision total knee arthroplasty is one of many critical steps that directly influence patient outcomes. Fifty MRI scans of normal atraumatic knees were analyzed to determine a quantitative relationship between the joint line of the knee and the bony landmarks of the knee joint: femoral epicondyles, metaphyseal flare of the femur, tibial tubercle, and proximal tibio-femoral joint. We describe the relationship of these six anatomic landmarks about the knee in a gender and size independent manner. This description supports a simple three-step algorithm allowing orthopaedic surgeons to calculate, instead of estimate, the location of the joint line of the knee.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 5 | Pages 662 - 667
1 May 2008
Strauss EJ Egol KA Alaia M Hansen D Bashar M Steiger D

This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk orthopaedic patients. A total of 58 patients had a retrievable inferior vena cava filter placed as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, most commonly for a history of previous deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, polytrauma, or expected prolonged immobilisation. In total 56 patients (96.6%) had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Two patients (3.4%) died in the peri-operative period for unrelated reasons.

Of the 56 surviving patients, 50 (89%) were available for follow-up. A total of 32 filters (64%) were removed without complication at a mean of 37.8 days (4 to 238) after placement. There were four filters (8%) which were retained because of thrombosis at the filter site, and four (8%) were retained because of incorporation of the filter into the wall of the inferior vena cava. In ten cases (20%) the retrievable filter was left in place to continue as primary prophylaxis. No patient had post-removal thromboembolic complications.

A retrievable inferior vena cava filter, as an adjunct to chemical and mechanical prophylaxis, was a safe and effective means of reducing the acute risk of pulmonary embolism in this high-risk group of patients. Although most filters were removed without complications, thereby avoiding the long-term complications that have plagued permanent indwelling filters, a relatively high percentage of filters had to be left in situ.