header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 28 - 28
1 May 2019
Pryce G Al-Hajjar M Wilcox R Thompson J Board T Williams S
Full Access

Impingement of total hip replacements (THRs) can cause rim damage of polyethylene liners, and lead to dislocation and/or mechanical failure of liner locking mechanisms[1]. Previous work has focussed on the influence of femoral neck profile on impingement without consideration of neck-shaft angle. This study assessed the occurrence of impingement with two different stem designs (Corail standard [135°] and coxa vara [125°]) under different activities with varying acetabular cup orientation (30° to 70° inclination; 0° to 50° anteversion) using a geometric modelling tool.

The tool was created in a computer aided design software programme, and incorporated an individual's hemi-pelvis and femur geometry[3] with a THR (DePuy Synthes Pinnacle® shell and neutral liner; size 12 Corail® standard or coxa vara and 32mm head). Kinematic data of activities associated with dislocation[2], such as stooping to pick an object from the floor was applied and incidences of impingement were recorded.

Predicted implant impingement was influenced by stem design. The coxa vara stem was predicted to cause implant impingement less frequently across the range of activities and cup orientations investigated, compared to the standard stem [Fig. 1]. The cup orientations predicted to cause impingement the least frequently were at lower inclination and anteversion angles, relative to the standard stem [Fig. 1]. The coxa vara stem included a collar, while the standard stem was collarless; additional analysis indicated that differences were due to neck angle and not the presence of a collar.

This study demonstrated that stem neck-shaft angle is an important variable in prosthetic impingement in THR and surgeons should be aware of this when choosing implants. Future work will consider further implant design and bone geometry variables. This tool has the potential for use in optimising stem design and position and could assist with patient specific stem selection based on an individual's activity profile.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.