Background: Surgical treatment of spinal deformities is complex and is performed by a limited number of spine surgeons. To obtain adequate radiological and clinical correction, a large amount of clinical experience is required when planning corrective surgery because of the enormous amount of patient related variables, and the many surgical techniques (e.g. rod rotation vs translation, pedicle screws vs hooks, anterior vs posterior).

The widely used classification systems (King and Lenke) are useful for documentation of the deformities. Unfortunately explicit guidelines for surgery are not clear. A multi-centre database with pre and postoperative patient data including photographic images and x-rays will be very useful in decision making. It will allow surgeons to find similar cases in the database that will help them in their decision making for surgical planning and execution. Furthermore it will provide extensive data to perform outcome studies, and to develop general treatment guidelines. Surgery for spinal deformities will become more evidence based and less dependent on the individual surgeons judgement.

Methods: A modern web-based database system, Scolisoft was developed for documenting patient data and curve characteristics. The system contains patient data (demographics etc), radiological data (AP, Lat, bending films), classification of curve patterns according to the often-used classification systems and information about the surgical procedure. It includes pre and postoperative radiological data and clinical photographs.

The patient data can also be stored and printed as a PDF-file, so that it can be used as a patient chart and for patient information purposes.

Scolisoft allows the user to select patients based on all the individual characteristics, e.g. curve classification. For pre-operative planning of a specific deformity, a cohort of patients with the same deformity (patient demographics, curve pattern, bending films etc) can be selected and the postoperative results viewed.

With the same selection tool, cohorts of patients can be selected for outcome studies.

Furthermore Scolisoft provides the possibility of discussing difficult cases with other spine surgeons using the system.

Finally, complications are registered according to the existing Scoliosis Research Society complication registry system.

Experiences: Data of more than 200 patients have been entered into the former PC application system. The current web based system has 60 cases that have been entered during its trial phase. Most cases have been adolescent or adult idiopathic scoliosis. Forty two surgeons have used the software and eight surgeons have participated in entering cases. The web-based version has shown to be very user friendly. Submitting the radiological and clinical images is easy (but takes some time). All data input is possible by a simple click of the mouse. Therefore it is relatively easy to learn.

The system already has the possibility for documenting other spine pathology such as sagittal plane deformities, fractures and spondylolisthesis.

Conclusion: Scolisoft is a powerful, user-friendly web-based registry for spinal deformities. It is a very useful tool in planning spinal deformity surgery and research. In this time of evidence-based medicine, it is time to take the planning of scoliosis surgery out of the realm of myth, and this database is a strong step in that direction.

Purpose of the study: We report a series of 12 patients who underwent surgery in 2003 or 2004 for spinal shortening as treatment for thoracic or lumbar metastasis.

Material and method: This series included seven females and five males, mean age 56.5 years (range 34–80 years). The operation was a resection of the vertebral body in a one-stage procedure. A simple posterior approach was used for two patients and a wider costotransversectomy approach was required for ten. Posterior fixation was installed with pedicle screws in the two vertebrae above and two below the resection. Mean operative time was 343 minutes (range 260–420 min). Mean blood loss was 2380 cc (range 600–5000). There were few surgery-related complications: one dural breach and one pulmonary breach.

Results: The decision to undertake surgery was made on the basis of neurological problems in seven patients. All patients were Frankel class C, unable to walk. Among these patients, five died in less than six months. For the two survivors, they were scored 7 on the Tokuhashi scale. The remainder scored 5. For the two survivors, one recovered walking capacity (Frankel D) and the other achieved a normal status (Frankel E). The five other patients underwent surgery for pain related to a kyphosis callus threatening the cord. We used the Karnofsky and the Oswestry score to analyze outcome. The score did not regress in any of the patients after surgery. Three patients improved their score significantly. The three others had an unchanged score. The best correction of the kyphosis callus was obtained when the vertebral collapse was greater than 50%. The preoperative regional deformity was measured at 23.2° (range 15–35°) which postoperatively reached 0.5° (range 20 to −17°).

Conclusion: This technique for spinal shortening appears to be a better alternative to anterior reconstruction, especially when the vertebral collapse is greater than 50%. In this context, this palliative surgery enables improved quality-of-life for a patient with often advanced disease.

Purpose of the study: We report the results of a series of seven cases of non-tuberculos infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis treated by posterior instrumentation and secondary anterior curettage of the infectious focus with bone grafting. This particular osteosynthesis method produces a short monosegmentary fixation limited to the space of the infected disc.

Material and methods: The series included six men and one woman (mean age 61.7 years, age range 37–82 years). The causal germ was identified in all cases: Staphylococcus aureus in five, and in one each, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Levels were L1L2 in one, L2L3 in two, L3L4 in three and L5S1 in one. Predisposing factors were history of prostatic cancer in two patients, coronary heart disease in one and chronic renal failure in one. One patient had received corticosteroid injections and two had no recognized co-morbid conditions. The surgical procedure was undertaken due to persistent pain in three patients (one with quadriceps amyotrophy and weakness), spinal instability with risk of neurological injury in two, and after failure of medical treatment in two patients who had persistent abscesses.

Results: Excepting one patient who died from renal failure four months after the surgical procedure, mean follow-up was 31.5 months (range six months to six years). Outcome was excellent in four patients, good in one, and a failure in one patient who was operated on because of instability. Failure of the instrumentation required surgical revision to extend the initial assembly. At last follow-up, all patients had achieved fusion of the instrumented zone and were considered to be cured of their infection.

Discussion: Classically, it is advisable to avoid instrumenting close to an infectious area in order to avoid the vicious circle of infection. Configurations described in the literature are usually extensive, blocking healthy levels beyond the infected area and compromising spinal mobility. However, a short instrumentation limited to one segment can be proposed when the end plates at the outer limits of the infectious focus are theoretically healthy. Careful analysis of the imaging data is required to carefully select patients who can benefit from this short configuration. Magnetic resonance imaging is most helpful.

Classic management of large and stiff thoracic scoliotic curves in the adolescent comprise of anterior release followed by posterior instrumentation. However third generation segmental spinal instrumentations have shown increased correction of thoracic curves. Therefore, the indication for an anterior release may no longer be required. We reviewed our database for cases with thoracic curves with Cobb angle between 70 and 90° that we had only done posterior surgery. We found that with adequate posterior release, and the use of third generation segmental instrumentation there is no need for anterior release even for curves in the 70–90° range.

Large and stiff thoracic scoliotic curves in the adolescent represent a classic indication of anterior release before posterior spinal instrumentation.

To assess if third generation segmental posterior instrumentation can omit the need of anterior surgery in large and stiff thoracic curves.

An independent observer, reviewed in a retrospective fashion our electronic database of adolescent scoliosis surgery (Scolisoft) with the following query: Thoracic curves, Cobb angle between 70 and 90° degrees and posterior surgery only. There was nineteen patients who fit the criteria. Out of these, four were judged to flexible (bends < than 45°) and were not included. Fifteen patients (mean age 13.6) with thoracic scoliosis with average Cobb 78.5° with a flexibility index of 32.5% were analyzed. (mean f/u: twenty-eight months)

Postoperatively the thoracic Cobb angle measured on average 34.8° (25° −45°), which represents a correction rate of 54 % (range, 40.0–67.1%) and remained unchanged at the last follow-up (35°). Sagittal alignment improved from an average 11° to 18°. There were two complications (one excessive bleeding and one infection). Coronal balance was improved, as was shoulder balance. All patients reported satisfactory results except the patient with an adding-on phenomena

In the literature most of the results of anterior thora-coscopic release and posterior surgery give a percentage of Cobb angle correction similar or inferior (averaging 50%) to our series for an average initial Cobb angle of less magnitude. With adequate posterior release, and the use of third generation segmental instrumentation there is no need for anterior release even for curves in the 70–90° range.

“Delta fixation” was developed to treat low-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. It involves placement of pedicle screws into L5 and from S1 through the L5/S1 disc into L5 (Fig.1). A biomechanical comparison to standard Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) with two anterior cages and pedicle screws in L5 and S1 was made. Eight fresh frozen human specimens were instrumented with both fixations and tested. Delta fixation was significantly more stable in resisting rotation. It requires less manipulation of the nerve roots and spares the cost of the fusion cages.

Our objective is to compare the stability of Delta versus PLIF fixation in the treatment of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

Delta fixation provides superior initial stability, and therefore is an acceptable alternative to PLIF for the treatment of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1.

Symptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5 is often managed with PLIF. This procedure requires extensive manipulation of the cauda equine, posterior resection of the disc and the placement of two inter-body cages as spacers in addition to pedicle screws in L5 and S1.

Delta Fixation has been developed to provide stable fixation with less nerve root manipulation and without the use of inter-body cages. It is therefore a safer alternative method of fixation that spares the additional cost of the fusion cages.

When comparing Delta fixation to PLIF fixation the only statistically significant difference was found in axial rotation. Delta fixation had 2.05 degrees less ROM and 0.90 degrees less NZ compared to PLIF fixation with P values of 0.0052 and 0.0104 respectively. This demonstrates that the delta fixation is more stable than PLIF fixation.

Eight fresh frozen human spines were used. Matched pairs were created and block randomization used to create two groups: PLIF fixation and Delta fixation groups. The specimens were instrumented with a grade II spondylolisthesis of L5-S1, tested, and then re-instrumented with the alternative fixation and tested again. Vertical displacement, axial rotation, flexion– extension and side bending were tested using an MTS machine.

Please contact author for tables and/or diagrams.