The management of the patella during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Despite the majority of patients reporting excellent outcomes following TKA, a common complaint is anterior knee pain. Resurfacing of the patella at the time of initial surgery has been proposed as a means of preventing anterior knee pain, however current evidence, including four recent meta-analyses, has failed to show clear superiority of patellar resurfacing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of patellar resurfacing compared to non-resurfacing in TKA. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analytic model to represent a hypothetical patient cohort undergoing primary TKA. Each patient will receive a TKA either with the Patella Resurfaced or Not Resurfaced. Following surgery, patients can transition to one of three chronic health states: 1) Well Post-operative, 2) Patellofemoral Pain (PFP), or 3) Serious Adverse Event (AE), which we have defined as any event requiring Revision TKA, including: loosening/lysis, infection, instability, or fracture (Figure 1). We obtained revision rates following TKA for both resurfaced and unresurfaced cohorts using data from the 2014 Australian Registry. This data was chosen due to similarities between Australian and North American practice patterns and patient demographics, as well as the availability of longer term follow up data, up to 14 years postoperative. Our effectiveness outcome for the model was the quality-adjusted life year (QALY). We used utility scores obtained from the literature to calculate QALYs for each health state. Direct procedure costs were obtained from our institution's case costing department, and the billing fees for each procedure. We estimated cost-effectiveness from a Canadian publicly funded health care system perspective. All costs and quality of life outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5%. All costs are presented in 2015 Canadian dollars.Background
Methods
The use of spinal anesthesia with adjuvant intra-thecal opioids has been commonly used in total knee arthroplasty without documented clinical benefit. It has been associated with a potential increase in side effects, including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and oxygen usage. This double-blinded RCT investigated whether the addition of epimorph to spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty resulted in superior pain control and decreased narcotic consumption without also causing an increase in postoperative complication rates. We performed a prospective double-blind trial in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were randomised to receive either spinal anesthesia alone or spinal anesthesia with epimorph (150 ug). All patients received infiltration of a local anesthetic cocktail intraoperatively. Both the study patients and staff measuring outcomes were blinded to the experimental treatment received during data collection. Postoperatively, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was recorded at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48hrs and a final value at 1 week. Narcotic use, Foley insertion, oxygen requirements, nausea, vomiting and pruritus were recorded during the course of hospitalisation. Forty-one patients were randomised into each of the spinal with epimorph and spinal alone treatment arms. The groups showed no significant differences in BMI, age, and gender distribution. In the first 12 hours postoperatively there was no difference in VAS for pain between the two groups, however there were significantly lower pain scores in the spinal alone patients at 18 hours (p=0.002), 24 hours (p=0.04) and 48 hours (p = 0.03) compared to the spinal with epimorph group. Narcotic usage was greater in the spinal group during the first 6 hours postoperatively, but beyond this time point narcotic usage was similar between the two groups. Additionally, there was a statistically significant increase in rate of complications with spinal epimorph including nausea (p=0.037) and pruritus (p=0.024). The incidence of urinary retention was greater in the spinal epimorph group, however this did not reach statistical significance. This study demonstrates no clinical benefit with the addition of intra-thecal opioids to spinal anesthetic in primary TKA. In addition to a failing to reduce VAS pain scores and overall narcotic consumption, increased complication rates were seen. For these reasons, this study does not support the use of epimorph in addition to spinal anesthesia for pain control in TKA.
