Introduction

Open and arthroscopic hip debridement may be used for treatment of femoral acetabular impingement (FAI). There is a paucity of evidence regarding the efficacy of one over the other.

Introduction

Open hip debridement surgery has been used for treatment of femoral acetabular impingement pain for over ten years in our unit. While literature has reported promising short-term outcomes, longer term outcomes are more sparsely reported.

Introduction

Open hip debridement surgery has been used for treatment of femoral acetabular impingement pain for over ten years in our unit. While literature has reported promising short term outcomes, longer term outcomes are more sparsely reported. We aim to assess survivorship and functional outcome at ten years, in patients who have undergone open hip debridement.

This study reviewed all patients who received an EXOGEN Express bone stimulating device (BSD) to treat delayed union / non-union following operative treatment for a long bone fracture & evaluate if our results are comparable with the NICE guideline expectations.

A retrospective review of records between December 2004 & January 2013 revealed 113 patients treated with a BSD. A total of 59 patients were eligible for analysis, (operative treatment for a long bone fracture with adjuvant EXOGEN BSD for non-union or delayed union). Twenty-one were open fractures.

The BSD was applied at a mean of 264 days post-operatively. Thirty-five patients went on to have a 2nd operation before union was achieved. Forty-two patients went on to union following application of the BSD. Mean time to union was 293 days. Seventeen patients failed to unite by the end of the study. There were no adverse reactions to the EXOGEN BSD in this cohort.

This study has shown that the use of an EXOGEN BSD is a safe, non-invasive method to successfully treat long bone non-unions following initial operative surgery, with potential cost savings (a potential saving of £48,888 to the hospital according to NICE estimations) compared to the standard re-operative management.

Routine postoperative radiographs following hip hemiarthroplasty are commonly undertaken despite it being suggested that they can cause delays to discharge, discomfort to patients and unnecessary radiation. Our study considered the necessity of these post-operative radiographs.

A retrospective search was conducted of all hemiarthroplasty procedures on the Royal Cornwall Hospital database. These were reviewed for cases where re-operation was conducted within 6 weeks. Notes and post-operative check radiographs of those who underwent re-operation were reviewed to determine how essential radiographs were in diagnosing complications requiring re-operations.

A total of 1557 hemiarthroplasty operations were identified. There were 37 incidences of re-operation within 6 weeks. 29 cases had normal check radiographs. 8 dislocations were picked up on post-operative radiographs. In all but one of these cases, clinical suspicion of complication had been raised prior to the radiograph. In the remaining case documentation was poor and no firm conclusion as to clinical suspicion could be drawn.

Our review of over 1500 hemiarthroplasty cases, demonstrated one incident where the check radiograph solely diagnosed an abnormality needing intervention that might not have been apparent clinically. We thus suggest that check radiographs following hip hemiarthroplasty should not be routinely ordered for all patients.

Aim

To review the patients that have undergone correction of a symptomatic femoral malunion using osteotomy combined with decortication.

We reviewed patients that have undergone correction of a symptomatic femoral malunion using osteotomy combined with decortication by retrospective reviewing all patients who have undergone the procedure, looking at the pre-operative deformity, correction achieved, time to union and complications.

Seven patients underwent correction under the senior author from 2003 to today. Average age was 46 years (range 32–60 years). All had femoral shortening, average 2.7cm (range 2–4 cm). Each also had at least one other plane of deformity with rotation being the next most commonly encountered in 5 out of the 7 (average 33 degrees). 2 had tri-planar deformity with the 5 having bi-planar deformity. Average time to union was 18.4 months (range 7 to 39 months) with an average of 1.6 operations (range 1 to 3 operations) to union. Two patients are awaiting union, 1 has required repeat plating and one is a primary fixation and correction awaiting union.

Correction of multiplanar deformity of the femur is challenging. Osteotomy with decortication provides a technique to achieve correction of significant femoral deformity union achieving full multi-planar deformity correction in a single operation. This paper provides guidance and a technical description of the operative technique.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether patients who had had excision of the Ligamentum Teres as part of a surgical hip dislocation for femoro-acetabular impingement exhibited symptoms of acute Ligamentum Teres rupture post-operatively. Recent reports in the literature suggest that injury to the Ligamentum Teres can cause instability, severe pain and inability to walk.

We present the results of a postal questionnaire to 217 patients who had undergone open surgical hip dislocation for femoro-acetabular impingement where the LT was excised. This included seven patients who had undergone bilateral surgery. The questionnaire was designed to enquire about specific symptoms attributed to LT injuries in the literature; gross instability, incomplete reduction, inability to bear weight and mechanical symptoms.

161 patients responded (75%), with a total of 168 (75%) questionnaires regarding 224 hips completed. There were 104 females and 64 males. Median age was 34 and median follow-up was 52 months. All patients were found to have cam deformities, 72% (n=121) had associated labral tears. All patients were able to fully weight bear after surgery. 77% experienced no groin pain and 61% experienced no pain on exercise. 35% of patients experienced popping and locking in their operated hip and 24% had subjective feeling of their hip giving way. Oxford Hip scores and Nonarthritic Hip scores improved by 12 and 28 points respectively (n=47).

Our results show that the symptoms of pain and instability described with LT pathology can be present but are by no means universal. This leads us to conclude that their symptoms may be attributed to labral pathology which is frequently noted to coexist.

The treatment of nonunion is challenging providing the surgeon with a variety of different surgical options in order to encourage and achieve bone consolidation. Despite excellent results presented in 2008 of 99% union rates, Judet Osteo-Periosteal Decortication does not seem to be popular at present with bone grafting and distraction osteo-modelling being the favoured option.

Retrospective analysis was performed from December 2002 to December 2008 of 46 cases of osteoperiosteal decortication(Judet technique) for failure of fracture union.

Union was successfully achieved in 39 of the 45 patients(85%) after a mean delay of 10.7 months(range 3-39 months). Thirty patients(65%) achieved union following the decortication procedure without subsequent operations. The mean number of procedures following decortication was 0.6(range 0-4) mostly being performed for metalwork failure. Metal work failure occurred in 13 cases(28%) with the majority occurring in decortications of the femur(n=11,85%). The femur was the location of all persistent non unions in the series. The nonunion scoring system(0-100,Calori et al 2008) means were noticeably worse for the persistent nonunion group(41.67, range 34-46) compared to the union group(29, range 4-52).

Osteoperiosteal decortication remains a highly effective surgical technique in the management of failed fracture union.

Introduction

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a relatively recent recognised condition and a potential cause of anterior hip pain in the young military adult population. Both Cam and Pincer type FAI may lead to inflammation, labral tears, and or damage to the smooth articular cartilage of the acetabulum leading potentially to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Open Surgical hip dislocation using the Ganz Trochanteric Flip approach is an accepted technique allowing osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim combined with labral repair if required. We present our results of this technique used in military personnel.

Introduction

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures (PHFs) and Complex Revision Hip Arthroplasty(CRHA) consistently present challenging management decisions. Extramedullary devices alone or in combination with strut graft or long stem prosthesis revisions (cemented and uncemented) have all been described as treatment options. A long distal locked femoral stem provides an alternative allowing immediate stability for weight bearing without impaction bone grafting or external plate fixation and strut grafting. It has a lower risk of subsidence.

24 patients underwent a Cannulok Stem procedure from 2003–2008. Each was reviewed regularly following surgery with clinical examination and Hip scores (Oxford and SF12). The indications for device use, Vancouver classification if a periprostheic fracture, radiological evidence of union and complications were all recorded from medical and radiological records. The results were then compared to similar studies.

The indications for Cannulok use were periprosthetic fracture (50%), infection with bone loss (12.5%), revision for aseptic loosening (33.3%) and subtrochanteric fracture post arthrodesis and metalwork removal (4.2%).

A 75% union rate was seen in periprosthetic fractures. There were 2 deaths, 2 deep infections and 1 superficial infection. The 40 mm offset stems resulted in 6 (25%) dislocations compared to 0% dislocations with the 45 mm offset stem. In addition there was 1 femoral stem revision for subsidence (no distal locking screws used) and 1 acetabular revision. There was an average follow up of 20 months.

This study suggests that the Cannulok Plus femoral reinforcement stem is a potential alternative treatment option in PHFs and CRHA with acceptable complication rates.

Heterotopic ossification is a recognised complication of surgery on the hip joint that can adversely affect the outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of heterotopic ossification following surgical hip dislocation and debridement for femoro-acetabular impingement using Ganz trochanteric flip osteotomy approach. We also compared the incidence of heterotopic ossification between two subgroups of patients; in the first group, a shaver burr was used to reshape the femoral head and in the second group, an osteotome was used.

Methods: We reviewed postoperative radiographs of all patients who underwent surgical hip dislocation and debridement during the period between March 2003 and July 2007. We excluded patients with radiographic follow-up of less than one year. Brooker classification was used to grade heterotopic ossifications.

Results: Ninety eight patients (mean age 35 years, range 12–65 years) were included with a mean radiological follow-up of 23 months (range 12–61 months). The overall incidence of heterotopic ossification was 31%. None of the patients developed Brooker grade III or IV heterotopic ossifications. The incidence of heterotopic ossifications in the shaver burr group (n=57) and in the osteotome group (n=41) was 30% and 32%, respectively.

Conclusions: Heterotopic ossification of minor grade is a common complication of surgical hip dislocation using trochanteric flip osteotomy approach. The use of a shaver burr did not result in higher rates of heterotopic ossifications despite the formation of large amounts bone debris.

The aim of Femoro-Acetabular Impingement (FAI) surgery is to improve femoral head-neck clearance by resection of the osseous bump deformity. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether osseous bumps will re-grow and to compare two instruments used for resection osteoplasty; a shaver burr and an osteotome.

We reviewed records of patients who underwent surgical hip dislocation and debridement via Ganz flip osteotomy between March 2003 and July 2007. We excluded patients with less than one-year radiographic follow-up.

Ninety-five patients (95) underwent 98 surgical hip dislocations and were included (mean radiological follow-up 23 months, range 12–61 months). Bump re-growth occurred in 16 cases (16%). Pre and postoperative Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS) were available for 12 of the 16 patients. The mean pre- and postoperative NAHS were 62 (range 26–95) and 83 (range 41–104) respectively (p= 0.02). In the shaver burr group (n=57), there were 6 cases of bump re-growth (12%) compared to 10 cases in the osteotome group (n=41) (32%).

In this study, recurrence of osseous bumps did not affect the outcome. Using shaver burrs resulted in lower rates of bump re-growth than using osteotomes. This could be related to heat osteonecrosis at the femoral head-neck junction.

We report a 10% failure rate for aseptic loosening and overall revision rate of 15% at 5 years mean follow up in 190 patients using the Cormet 2000 Dual coat ace-tabular component.

Between April 2001 and March 2004, this cup was used in our region by 4 surgeons. It was peripherally expanded and comprised a cobalt chrome shell, plasma sprayed with a further layer of cobalt chrome which was then coated with hydroxyapatite. This backing has since been abandoned in favour of a titanium plasma coat beneath the hydroxyapatite because of a higher than expected incidence of early loosening.

There were 190 cups implanted in 174 patients, 142 with resurfacing heads. The average age was 54 and 99 were male.

Revision for aseptic loosening was required in 20 cups (10%) at a mean interval of 23 months including five within 2 months, Of the early revisions three developed a deep infection. Undiagnosed groin pain in four further patients appeared at revision to arise from an inflamed bursa secondary to impingement of psoas tendon on the rim of the cup. There was one primary infection, one infection following revision of a trochanteric osteotomy and two neck fractures. Persistent unexplained groin pain was seen in three patients who have declined further surgery

Failure of this backing to integrate with bone led to an unacceptably high early loosening rate. Positioning of the larger resurfacing cups is critical to avoid painful irritation of psoas. Early revision carries a high risk of infection.

Between January 2003 and December 2004, 14 patients underwent bilateral resurfacing arthroplasty via a Ganz trochanteric osteotomy. This bilateral group was mobilised fully weight-bearing with crutches. During the same period 139 Ganz trochanteric osteotomies were performed for unilateral hip resurfacing. These patients were mobilised with crutches, weight-bearing up to 10 kg on the operated leg.

Nine osteotomies (32%) in the bilateral group subsequently developed a symptomatic non union requiring revision of fixation. This compares with 10 patients (7%) in the unilateral group. Applying the Fisher’s exact test, the difference reached significance (p=0.0004). In 2 patients a second revision was required to achieve union. In 1 patient, revision of trochanteric fixation precipitated a deep infection.

Protected weight-bearing following a Ganz trochanteric osteotomy is important to the success of the procedure. Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty through a Ganz approach should be avoided. If it is undertaken, we recommend that patients should be non weight-bearing for 6 weeks following surgery. Non union following a Ganz trochanteric osteotomy for arthroplasty carries a significant morbidity.

Since 2003 we have adopted an aggressive approach to the management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) deformity, an important cause of femoro-acetabular impingement and associated with the development of early adult hip arthritis.

Sixteen patients aged 16.7 years (range 11–20), 13 male, have undergone surgery to manage their SUFE deformity. Nine underwent primary surgery using a Ganz approach (7) or in-situ pinning with femoral neck resection via a Smith-Peterson approach (2). Seven had previously undergone in-situ pinning 26 months earlier (range 4–44 months) of whom two had acetabular chondral flap tears with eburnated bone and six had significant labral degenerative changes associated with calcification or tears. Only one of the nine patients who underwent primary aggressive management of their SUFE, had a labral tear. Four patients underwent mobilisation of the femoral head on its vascular pedicle, followed by anatomical realignment.

At an average follow-up of 22.3 months (range 1–41 months) 15 remained well with excellent function. Leg lengths remained equal in 12, with average shortening of 2 cm in the remaining four. Segmental AVN occurred in the first patient after damage to the vascular pedicle during drilling of the neck; the technique has been modified to prevent this.

Despite having performed over 400 surgical hip dislocations, the authors continue to find the management of this condition challenging; nevertheless, having seen the consequences of femoro-acetabular impingement in these young patients, we believe that aggressive management to correct anatomical alignment is essential for the future well being of the hip.

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain in young adults and a precursor to osteoarthritis. Morphological abnormality of either the acetabulum, proximal femur, or both, may result in FAI. The majority of patients however, have a cam deformity of the proximal femur. From a research perspective, FAI is an example of how subtle morphological abnormality results in a predictable pattern of cartilage damage, and thereby offers great potential as a model to study early degenerative disease and for clinical trials of joint preserving treatments. Accurate classification of the morphology of the hip is essential for this further study.

The aim of this study was to define normal, borderline, and abnormal parameters for the morphology of the proximal femur, in the context of the cam deformity, by studying asymptomatic individuals with normal clinical examination and no osteoarthritis from the general population.

Methods: 157 individuals (79 male, 78 female, mean age 46 years) with no previous history of hip problems were recruited. The participants were the spouses/partners of patients involved in a cohort study of osteoarthritis and FAI. All participants underwent clinical (interview, examination, and hip scores) and radiological assessment (standardised AP Pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs of each hip). Radiographs were scored for the presence of osteoarthritis, and the morphology of the proximal femur was analysed. The alpha angle, anterior offset ratio, presence of a cam ‘bump’, synovial herniation pit were recorded in each hip.

Results: 21 subjects were excluded because they either had positive clinical features or radiological evidence of osteoarthritis (equivalent to a Kellgren and Lawrence grade of 2). From the remaining 136 subjects, with essentially ‘normal hips from the general population’, mean values for the alpha angle and anterior offset ratio were generated. Borderline and Abnormal values are suggested. Gender differences were noted with higher mean alpha angles and lower offset ratios occurring in men.

Discussion: Although it has limitations, standardised plain radiography remains the cheapest and most convenient way to screen an individual for the presence of a cam deformity. Despite the recent interest in FAI, our knowledge of what is normal in the general population, as assessed using appropriate radiographic techniques, is modest. The ranges provided by this study will facilitate the accurate classification of subjects with FAI, thereby providing guidance for surgeons treating such patients, and also enable the generation of refined cohorts for the study of the natural history of subtle morphological abnormalities of the hip, and for enrolment in clinical trials.

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an important cause of hip pain in young adults and a precursor to osteoarthritis. Genetic factors are important in the aetiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. From a research perspective, FAI is an example of how subtle morphological abnormality results in a predictable pattern of cartilage damage, and thereby offers great potential as a model to study early degenerative disease.

Although many causes of FAI are described, the vast majority of patients give no history of previous hip disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which FAI has an underlying genetic basis, by studying the siblings of patients undergoing surgery for FAI and comparing them with controls.

Methods: 66 patients (probands, 29 male, 37 female, mean age 39.1 years) treated surgically for FAI provided siblings for the study. These patients were classified as having cam, pincer or mixed FAI. 101 siblings (55 male, 56 female, mean age 38.2 years) were recruited. The control group consisted of the 77 partners of those siblings (40 male, 37 female, mean age 41.9 years). All subjects underwent clinical (interview, examination, and hip scores) and radiological assessment (standardised AP Pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs of each hip). Radiographs were scored for the presence of osteoarthritis, and cam- and pincer-type abnormalities.

Results: Participants were classified as a) Normal morphology with no clinical features, b) Abnormal morphology but no clinical features c) Abnormal morphology with clinical signs but no symptoms, and d) Abnormal morphology with symptoms and signs. The sibling relative risks were significant for groups b, c, and d, supporting the hypothesis of an underlying genetic predisposition to FAI. Siblings usually demonstrated the same type of abnormal morphology as the proband. Gender specificity was apparent however, with pincer abnormalities which were usually apparent in female probands being common in sisters but less common in brothers. The brothers of probands with cam deformities almost universally demonstrated the same deformity, although only 50% of sisters did so.

Discussion: Genetic influences are important in the aetiology of FAI. Whether the morphological abnormality is determined at conception or by an inherited predisposition to an acquired event during maturity warrants further study. We have identified a spectrum of disease with a proportion of siblings with abnormal morphology currently asymptomatic. These cohorts present an opportunity to prospectively study the natural history of the condition, improve our understanding of the mechanisms and pathology in early degenerative disease, and potentially to be recruited into clinical trials of surgical and adjuvant treatments.

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes pain in young adults and osteoarthritis. Genetic factors are important in the aetiology of osteoarthritis. We aimed to investigate the extent to which FAI has an underlying genetic basis, by studying the siblings of patients undergoing surgery for FAI and comparing them with controls.

Methods: 66 patients (probands, 29 male, 37 female, mean age 39.1 years) treated surgically for FAI provided siblings for the study. Probands were classified as having cam, pincer or mixed FAI. 101 siblings (55 male, 56 female, mean age 38.2 years) were recruited. The control group consisted of their 77 partners and was age and gender-matched. All subjects were assessed clinically and radiologically (standardised AP Pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs of each hip). Radiographs were scored for the presence of osteoarthritis, and morphological abnormalities.

Participants were classified as:

Normal morphology, no clinical features

Results: The sibling relative risks were significant for groups b, c, and d (ranging between 2–5, p< 0.01). Pro-bands and siblings shared the same pattern of abnormal morphology. Gender specificity was apparent: pincer abnormalities common in sisters but not in brothers. The brothers of probands with cam deformities almost universally demonstrated the same deformity, but only 50% of sisters did.

Discussion: Genetic influences are important in the aetiology of FAI. Whether the morphological abnormality is determined at conception or by an inherited predisposition to an acquired event during development warrants further study. Symptoms are variable, indicating a spectrum of disease progression. These cohorts present an opportunity to prospectively study the natural history of the condition, improve understanding of the mechanisms and pathology, and potentially to be recruited into clinical trials.

Introduction: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing hip replacement is an important complication which may lead to fracture or failure. The surgical approach may affect the blood supply to the femoral head. We compared the changes in femoral head oxygenation resulting from the extended posterior approach to those resulting from the anterolateral approach, the trochanteric flip approach and a modified, soft tissue preserving posterior approach.

Methods: We recruited 48 patients who underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) to measure bone oxygen levels. A calibrated gas-sensitive electrode was inserted in the femoral head following division of the fascia lata. Intra-operative X-ray confirmed correct electrode placement. Base-line oxygen concentration levels were recorded immediately after electrode insertion and continuous measurements were then performed throughout surgery. All results were expressed relative to the baseline, which was considered as 100% relative oxygen concentration and changes during surgery through the posterior approach (n=10), the antero-lateral approach (n=12), the trochanteric flip approach (n=15) and the modified posterior approach (n=11) were compared.

Results: The relative oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure was significantly reduced when hip resurfacing was performed through the posterior (22%, SD 31%, p< 0.005) or a modified posterior (35%, SD 31%, p< 0.005) approach, but recovered in the anterolateral (123%, SD 99%, p=0.6) and trochanteric flip group (89%, SD 62%, p=0.5). Sub-group analysis of these two relatively blood preserving approaches showed that intra-operative oxygen concentration was significantly more consistent during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach (p< 0.02).

Discusssion and conclusion: This study has demonstrated that disruption of blood flow to the femoral head during HRA is dependent on the surgical approach. We therefore believe that blood supply preserving approaches (i.e. anterolateral, trochanteric flip) may be associated with a lower risk of avascular necrosis and femoral neck fracture.

Introduction: The open treatment of hip impingement is now a well-recognised technique with numerous publications about pathogenesis and surgical technique. There are very few publications of very small series discussing surgical results.

We present the results of 148 hips at a mean follow-up of 20 months (range 4 – 55).

Methods: This is a two surgeon series of sequential patients including the early learning curve. Patients were treated for impingement through a Ganz trochanteric osteotomy and open surgical hip dislocation. Patient data, operative findings and methods, complication and clinical follow up were recorded as a prospective audit and include Oxford and McCarthy Non Arthritic Hip scores.

Results: The patient demographics are as follows:

141 patients, 148 hips.

We have had the following complications: 4 trochanteric non unions requiring revision fixation, 2 deep vein thrombosis, 2 haematomas, 1 superficial infection, no deep Infections.

Life table survival curve with revision to arthroplasty defined as failure.

Discussion: The early to midterm results of this innovative procedure are encouraging even when including the decision making and surgical technique learning curves. We will present the hip scores and discuss the failures in detail to warn others embarking on this surgery which cases are more likely to lead to unsatisfactory outcomes.

Since 2003 we have adopted an aggressive approach to the management of the SUFE deformity, an important cause of anterior femoro-acetabular impingement, associated with the development of early adult hip arthritis.

16 patients aged 16.7 years (range 11–20, 3 female, 13 male, 8 right, 8 left hips) underwent surgery to manage their SUFE deformity.

7 patients had secondary correction of deformity after previous in-situ pinning and 9 underwent primary surgical management using a Ganz approach (7) or primary in-situ pinning with femoral neck resection via a Smith-Peterson approach (2).

Of the 7 patients who had primary in-situ pinning 26 months (range 4–44 months) earlier, 2 had acetabular chondral flap tears with eburnated bone and 6 had significant labral degenerative changes associated with calcification or tears.

Only one of the nine patients who underwent primary aggressive management of their SUFE, had a labral tear.

4 patients underwent mobilisation of the femoral head on its vascular pedicle followed by anatomical realignment.

At an average follow-up of 22.3 months (range 1–41 months) 15 remained well with excellent function. Leg lengths remained equal in 12, with an average shortening of 2cm in the remaining 4 patients.

Segmental AVN occurred in the first patient after damage to the vascular pedicle during drilling of the neck; the technique has been modified to prevent further occurrences.

Removal of the trochanteric osteotomy screws has been performed in 4 cases.

Despite having performed over 400 surgical hip dislocation, the authors continue to find the management of this condition challenging; nevertheless, having seen the direct consequences of femoro-acetabular impingement at an early stage in these young patients, we believe that aggressive management to correct anatomical alignment is essential for the future well being of the hip.

Thinning of the femoral neck occurs in 77% of patients undergoing hybrid Birmingham hip resurfacing using a posterior approach (Shimmin 2007). Villar recently reported lower neck thinning rates in uncemented Cormet resurfacings (11.7%) compared with hybrid Birmingham resurfacing (13.4%), both via a posterior approach.

We have evaluated implant position and femoral neck thinning in a cohort of 273 uncemented HA coated Cormet 2000 hip resurfacings using ‘B’-series (Titanium/HA coated) cups in 269 patients (mean age 54 years, 39% female) with a mean follow-up of 3 years (range 1–4 years).

Mean cup inclination was 45° (30°–63°), mean SSA 138° (120°–178°). No lucent or sclerotic zones have been identified around the stem of the component. Only one femoral neck fracture has occurred (incidence 0.36%)

We have identified only one case of femoral neck thinning in our series (0.36%).

Whilst Villar has demonstrated a slight reduction in neck thinning rates using the same implants compared to a hybrid fixation Birmingham resurfacing, his neck thinning rates are almost 40 times higher than in our series. Shimmins ‘severe neck thinning (> 10%) rates (27%) are approximately 120 times higher than our series. In addition, we have been unable to confirm the relationship between implant position and neck thinning described by Shimmin in our series using the combined Ganz/uncemented resurfacings compared with Birmingham resurfacings.

Implant design and surgical approach have an impact on ‘neck thinning after resurfacing; we should be wary of treating all resurfacing implants and techniques as a uniform cohort.

Introduction: Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after resurfacing hip replacement is an important complication which may lead to fracture or failure. We compared the changes in femoral head oxygenation resulting from the posterior approach to those resulting from the anterolateral approach and the trochanteric flip approach.

Methods: In 37 patients undergoing hip resurfacing surgery, a calibrated gas-sensitive electrode was inserted superolaterally in the femoral head via the femoral neck following division of the fascia lata. Inter-operative X-ray confirmed correct electrode placement. Baseline oxygen concentration levels were recorded immediately after electrode insertion. All results were expressed relative to this baseline, which was considered as 100% relative oxygen concentration. Oxygen levels were monitored continuously throughout the operation. 10 patients underwent surgery through the posterior approach, 12 patients through the anterolateral approach and 15 through the trochanteric flip approach.

Results: A similar pattern of intra-operative reduction in femoral oxygen concentration was observed for all reviewed approaches. The average change in oxygen concentration during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach was found to be significantly less than through posterior (p< 0.02) and anterolateral (p< 0.02) approaches. Oxygen concentration following joint relocation and soft tissue reconstruction recovered significantly in the anterolateral and trochanteric flip group only. The posterior approach resulted in significantly lower oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure (22%, SD 31) than the anterolateral approach (123%, SD 99; p< 0.05) and the trochanteric flip approach (89%, SD 62, p< 0.02).

Discussion and Conclusion: The anterolateral and trochanteric flip approaches disrupt the femoral head blood supply significantly less than the posterior approach in patients undergoing resurfacing. The most consistent intra-operative oxygen levels were observed during surgery through the trochanteric flip approach. Oxygen concentration during the anterolateral approach was found to be highly dependent upon leg position. The incidence of complications related to avascular necrosis might be decreased by adopting blood supply conserving surgical approaches.

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Materials and Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 781 procedures in 676 patients have been recorded (54% posterior approach, 40% antero-lateral, 6% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.5 years (0.1–9.7 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 85.9 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.2 years. 60% of implantations were on male patients. The principal diagnosis was; OA 87%, RA 5%, AVN, post-traumatic OA and DDH 2% each, Perthes 1% and the remainder 1%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.6 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 7%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 years. In the OA subgroup 3.3% have been revised, approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Conclusions: The results of this cohort (which includes the learning period of the contributing surgeons) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Sub-classification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 905 procedures in 782 patients have been recorded (52% posterior approach, 39% anterolateral 9% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.8 years (0.1–9.5 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 86.1 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.4 years. 61% of patients were male. The principal diagnosis was; OA 88.3%, RA 4.3%, AVN 2.1%, posttraumatic OA 1.1%, DDH 2.1%, Perthes 0.7% and the remainder 1.4%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.7 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 10%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 to 10 years. Survivorship in the OA subgroup was 96.7% with approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Discussion: The results of this cohort (including all contributors’ learning curves) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Subclassification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.

Introduction: The concept of osteoperiosteal decortication for the treatment of fracture non-union and mal-union was introduced by Judet in the early 1960’s. Over 1000 cases have been treated with a union rate of 80 – 90%.

Methods: A review of the clinical notes and plain radiographs was carried out on 21 patients who underwent osteoperiostal decortication between 2002 and 2004. There were 11 male and 9 female patients with 14 femoral, 5 tibial and 2 humeral fractures. 18 patients had non unions and 3 patients malunions. The mean time from fracture to surgery was 8.2 months for the non-unions (range 6 to 16 months) and patients had previously had a mean of 1.8 procedures (range 0 to 4) prior to the index decortication procedure.

Results: 19 patients progressed to union (90%). 9 patients had complications (43%). There were 6 failures of fixation requiring revision surgery and 4 deep infections (2 of which proceeded to amputation). In 4 patients supplementation of the decortication with bone graft or BMP was performed.

Discussion: This series represents the learning curve of the senior surgeon using this technique.

In the treatment of complex non-unions or malunions, the use of osteoperiosteal decortication can achieve a union rate of 90%. However there are high complication rates although the complications are usually salvageable. In this series the infection rate in the distal tibial was noted to be especially high with 3 out of the 4 infective complications being in the tibial fractures.

Introduction: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Methods: Functional outcome was measured using the Oxford hip and McCarthy non-arthritic hip scores pre and post-operatively.

Results: Since January 2003, 36 hips in 34 patients (average age of 43 years (14–65)) underwent surgical hip dislocation for treatment of FAI. In 9 hips, grade 4 osteoarthritis was present in greater than 10 x 10mm regions after reshaping of the abnormal anatomy. In these cases, hip resurfacing was performed.

Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft.

Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).

Discussion: The early results of surgical hip dislocation are encouraging. Careful patient selection is important in order to exclude patients with hip osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to see if this technique prevents the natural progression to osteoarthritis.

Introduction: Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) causes anterior hip pain, labral tears and damage to the articular cartilage leading to early osteoarthritis of the hip. Surgical hip dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral neck and acetabular rim is a technique pioneered by the Bernese group for the treatment of FAI. We present and discuss our results of this technique.

Methods: functional outcome was measured using the oxford hip and McCarthy non-arthritic hip scores pre and post-operatively.

Results: Since January 2003, 36 hips in 34 patients (average age of 43 years (14–65)) underwent surgical hip dislocation for treatment of FAI. In 9 hips, grade 4 osteoarthritis was present in greater than 10 x 10mm regions after reshaping of the abnormal anatomy. In these cases, hip resurfacing was performed.

Of the 27 hips preserved, 14 had chondral ‘carpet’ flaps debrided, 17 underwent recession of the acetabular rim at the site of impingement, 6 had removal of medial osteophytes, 6 had labral and/or bony cysts excised and grafted and 1 underwent an osteochondral graft.

In 3 hips (12%) osteoarthritis progressed requiring hip resurfacing within the first year.

Oxford Hip Score improved from an average 36 (range 17–59) to 23 (12–45) and McCarthy hip score from 43 (9–74) to 62 (36–72) in the preserved hips at an average 15 months following surgery (range 6–33 months).

Discussion: The early results of surgical hip dislocation are encouraging. The open procedure has distinct advantages compared to arthroscopy enabling a wider range of lesions to be treated. Careful patient selection is important in order to exclude patients with hip osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to see if this technique prevents the natural progression to osteoarthritis

Scarf osteotomy improves hallux valgus and can be used for deformities with large intermetatarsal angles. It is designed to minimise shortening of the first ray. The aim of this radiographic analysis was to assess the outcome of patients undergoing Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital.

The initial 18 consecutive cases performed by the senior author were analysed using the guidelines recommended by the American Foot and Ankle Society. Standardised anterior-posterior radiographs of the foot were compared pre-operatively and at 6 weeks postoperatively. Measurements of the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle (HVA), joint congruency angle (JCA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), sesamoid position and metatarsal length were used to assess any improvement.

The results showed a significant median reduction of the IMA of 70, HVA of 180, JCA of 50, and the DMAA of 30 (all p values < 0.001). The medial sesamoid position in relation to the first metatarsal also improved from a mean value of 2.28 to 1 using the American Foot and Ankle Society grading system. There was no shortening of metatarsal length as measured using the Hardy and Clapham method.

This study shows that the radiographic outcome of Scarf osteotomy at the Royal Cornwall Hospital compares favourably with that found in the literature. It provides effective correction of moderate to large intermetatarsal angles.

Decreased head-neck ratio diameter and component malposition in total hip arthroplasty are factors known to result in impingement, increased rates of dislocation, wear and failure. In addition to these complications, impingement of the femoral neck on the acetabular component of a hip resurfacing may result in femoral neck fracture and loosening of the acetabular component. Little is known regarding the optimum femoral and acetabular hip resurfacing component position to avoid impingement.

In the first part of this study we analysed the radiographic component position of 131 consecutive hip resurfacings. In the second part the effect of three component variables on the range of motion to impingement were analysed using a dry bone model:

Inclination of the acetabular cup

The mean femoral-stem shaft angle in the first part of the study was 138° (range 121° to 158°). The mean acetabular inclination angle was 45° (range 30° to 63°). This wide range in position mirrors that described in the literature. The dry bone study revealed an optimum acetabular cup inclination tending towards 50° and an anteversion of 25°. A large diameter femoral head relative to the femoral neck resulted in a greater range of motion to impingement. A fine balance however exists, to remove a minimum amount of pelvic bone to accommodate a larger acetabular component with an ‘oversized’ femoral component.

The acetabular resurfacing cup positions described allow the greatest range of physiological hip movement. New technology and improvements to existing equipment and techniques will hopefully lead to more accurate placement of hip resurfacing components minimising the risk of impingement and its complications in this high demand group of patients

Aim: To report the early results of the Elite Hylamer hip with Zirconium femoral heads in patients younger than 60 years. Methods: 29 hips were implanted in 26 patients by a single surgeon with a specialist interest in hip arthroplasty. Third generation cementing techniques were used for all implants. All patients have been followed up. There has been one death. Results have been analysed using the life table method using the Peto method for 95% confidence intervals. Results: Mean age 49.2 years (range 31–57). 12 Females and 17 Males.15 of 29 hips (53.3%) have been revised or are currently on the waiting list for revision surgery. These failures have occurred in 7 Females and 8 Males. Mean time to failure 35.4 months (range 18 to 68 months). All failures have been as a result of aseptic loosening. Survivorship analysis reveals a 32.42% survival at 5 to 6 years (6.9% standard error). Conclusions: At the time of its introduction, Hylamer was thought to represent a significant step forward in the reduction of the problem of osteolysis. This however has not been our experience. In the light of the catastrophic failure rate in this series of patients, all postoperative X-rays were critically reviewed. We were unable to observe any dramatic technical errors by way of implant malpositioning and cement mantle deficiencies to account for the observed failures. We have also seen that statistically there is no difference in the hip scores for the patients whose hips have failed and those who have not yet met the criteria for failure. In view of this it is imperative that patients with this implant should be reviewed both clinically and radiologically. We feel that these results should be published earlier rather than later to ensure that others remain vigilant in the follow up of their patients

We report the results of a prospective study of 140 consecutive cases of acetabular revision using large frozen femoral head allografts and cemented all polyethylene acetabular components. The mean follow-up time was 10 years (5 Ð 16).

Thirty patients died, seven were lost to follow-up and 26 had failed and undergone further surgery. Nineteen failures were due to aseptic failure and collapse of the graft. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis calculated a mean survival at 10 years of 88.5% for revision for any reason.

We compare all reported techniques of acetabular reconstruction for similar defects and recommend a surgical strategy based on the available evidence, but weighted towards a preference to reconstitute bone stock rather than removing further bone in the revision situation.

Purpose: Fractures of the anterior acetabular wall with preservation of the pelvic inlet are rare. These lesions were not noted or classiþed by Judet and Letournel in their classiþcation system Ð Ç In fractures of the anterior wall, the anterior part of the articular horseshoe breaks off with a major portion of the middle segment of the anterior column È. The ilio-inguinal approach was recommended for the surgical treatment of these fractures. Method : We have encountered two cases involving purely the anterior wall with preservation of the pelvic inlet, rather than the anterior wall fracture described by Judet and Letournel. We have identiþed only two other cases in the international literature. The recognition that these fractures were not as that described by Judet and Letournel was essential, as an alternative surgical approach was necessary for reconstruction. The ilioinguinal approach of Judet and Letournel is the technique of choice in anterior fractures, but provides only very limited potential for intra-articular manipulation through the line of fracture. The Smith-Petersen approach was practically the only feasible choice as intra-articular exposure is difþcult or impossible to obtain with the classical approaches used for anterior acetabular fractures. Results: Both of our cases were reconstructed via the Smith-Petersen approach. Postoperative review at 18 months demonstrated painless, fully mobile hips with evidence of radiological union of the fractures. Conclusion: We propose designating as ñfracture of the anterior columnñ all the anterior fractures described by Judet and Letournel (column and wall) that justify the ilioinguinal approach. We would reserve the term ñanterior wallñ for large anterior acetabular rim fractures, with the extension exclusively lateral to and below the pelvic brim. We recommend the use of a Smith-Petersen approach for reconstruction once this fracture pattern is identiþed.

Aims: To review the early results of shoulder arthroplasty in the weight bearing shoulder of long term pareplegic patients. We have been unable to find previously published results of this subgroup of shoulder arthroplasty patients in the litterature. Method: The case notes and X-rays of 5 female patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. These patients all had longstanding paraplegia and were wheelchair bound. All patients has been prospectively scored with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s (ASES) function score and the Constant score. Results: The patients had a mean age of 70 yrs (61–88) at the time of surgery. Three of the 5 shoulders and rotator cuff tears at the time of surgery, 2 of which were repaired. The results are summarised in the table. There was no radiological evidence of failure apart from the migration of the single cemented glenoid component. Conclusion: In view of the satisfactory improvement in pain in particular following these procedures, we feel that it is reasonable to continue to offer this procedure in this subgroup of patients. We will however remain vigilant with regard to any further complications arising because of the increased loading in these prostheses at the medium and long term.

We evaluated the use of a hemipelvic acetabular transplant in twenty revision hip arthroplasties with massive acetabular bone defects (Paprosky IIIB) at a mean follow-up of 5-years (4–10 years). These defects were initially trimmed to as geometric a shape as possible by the surgeon. The hemipelvic allografts were then cut to a geometric shape to match the acetabular defects and to allow tight stable positioning of the graft between the host ilium ischium and pubis. The graft was further stabilised with screw fixation. A cemented cup (without a reinforcement ring) was entirely supported by the allograft in all procedures.

We report 65% good intermediate-term results.

There were seven failures (five aseptic loosening and two deep infections). Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in only one of these cases. Aseptic graft osteolysis began radiographically at a mean of 14 months and revision occurred at a mean of 2 years in the 5 aseptic failure cases. All 5 cases could be reconstructed again due to the restoration of bone stock provided by the hemipelvic graft. One infected case was able to be reconstructed using impaction allografting and the other was converted to a Girdlestone hip.

Thirteen of twenty acetabular reconstructions did not require revision. Radiographic bone bridging between the graft and host was evident in 12 cases. In 2 cases, ace-tabular migration began early (at 5 and 27 months) but stopped (at 35 and 55 months). These 2 cases have been followed for 6 and 9 years respectively, with no further migration. Two dislocations occurred but did not require acetabular revision.

The function of these hips is good with a mean Postel Merle D’Aubigne score of 16.5.

We feel that these are satisfactory intermediate term results for massive acetabular defects too large for reconstruction with other standard techniques.