Background

Internet delivered interventions may provide a route to rapid support for behavioural self-management for low back pain (LBP) that could be widely applied within primary care. Although evidence is emerging that more complex technologies (mobile apps linked to digital wristbands) can have some impact on LBP-related disability, there is a need to determine the effectiveness of highly accessible, web-based support for self-management for LBP.

Abstract

Abstract

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomised control trial aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA post – operatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date this trial included high risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RTC.

TRAC-24 was a prospective randomised controlled trial on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included, Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour post-operative oral regime, group 2 received only the perioperative dose and group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90.

Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by group 2 and then group 3. The difference between groups 1 and 3 −£797.77 (95% CI −1478.22, −117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances and blood transfusions.

This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA.

Septic Arthritis (SA) is considered a surgical urgency/ emergency by physicians around the world. As our understanding grows, and improved diagnostic algorithms are developed, it has become apparent that competing interests in terms of accurately diagnosing concurrent osteomyelitis may supercede rapid surgical intervention when the imaging is timely. Nevertheless, even in cases of isolated SA, many patients will require repeat surgery. We aimed to assess factors which could predict this.

A multicenter retrospective redcap database was created involving 20 pediatric centers from the CORTICES study group with the goal of better understanding pediatric musculoskeletal infection (PMSKI). All patients who met inclusion for the database were considered, surgeons for each site determined through imaging and chart review which patients met the diagnosis of isolated SA. Patients with concomitant abscesses or osteomyelitis were expressly excluded. Appropriate non parametric statistics were used to assess univariate significance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess clinical factors associated with an increased likelihood of more than one surgery. Receiver characteristics operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal cutoffs to discriminate between children who required more than one surgery compared to those who required only one surgery. A probability algorithm was developed for the number of clinical factors present and the likelihood requiring more than one surgery following SA diagnosis.

“Four hundred and fifty-four patients with isolated SA were analyzed from 20 US hospitals. Patients were 5.4 +/− 4.8 years old at admission, and the cohort was 56% male. Of the 454 patients, 47 (10.4%) needed more than one surgery. Bivariate comparisons across surgery groups found significant differences in minimum platelet count (pplatelet, a patient has a 0.3% reduction in the odds of needing more than one surgery (OR=.997; p=0.04). For each additional ten units of CRP, a patient has a 0.1% increase in the odds of needing more than one surgery (OR=1.001; p<0.001). Our predictive algorithm found that children with both risk factors had a 64% chance of requiring multiple surgeries.

Higher CRP values and lower platelet values indicate more severe disease in isolated SA with a greater likelihood of repeat surgery. Higher CRP and lower platelet counts may portend multiple surgeries and caregivers of children with isolated SA should be advised as such.

Background

91% of blood loss in Total Hip Replacement (THR) occurs in the period after skin closure and the first 24 post-operative hours. TRAC-24 was established to identify if an additional 24-hour post-operative oral regime of Tranexamic acid (TXA) is superior to a once-only intravenous dose at surgery.

Background and aims

The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines.

Background

Improving primary care management of musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a priority. A pilot cluster RCT tested prognostic stratified care for patients with common MSK pain presentations, including low back pain, in 8 UK general practices (4 stratified care; 4 usual care) with 524 patients. GPs in stratified care practices were asked to use i) the Keele STarT MSK tool for risk-stratification and ii) matched treatment options for patients at low-, medium- and high-risk of persistent pain. A linked qualitative process evaluation explored patients' and GPs' views and experiences of stratified care.

Background and Purpose

Healthcare for sciatica is usually ‘stepped’ with initial advice and analgesia, then physiotherapy, then more invasive interventions if symptoms continue. The SCOPiC trial tested a stratified care algorithm combining prognostic and clinical characteristics to allocate patients into one of three groups, with matched care pathways, and compared the effectiveness of stratified care (SC) with non-stratified, usual care (UC).

Background and aims

The Keele STarT Back approach is effective for stratifying patients with low back pain in primary care, but a similar approach has not been tested with a broader range of patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. We report a feasibility and pilot trial examining the feasibility of a future main trial of a primary care based, risk-stratification (STarT MSK) approach for patients with back, neck, knee, shoulder or multi-site pain.

Aims

Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma 11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1: a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior interosseous), and ulnar nerves.

Purpose & Background

The STarT Back risk-stratification approach uses the STarT Back Tool to categorise patients with low back pain (LBP) at low, medium or high-risk of persistent disabling pain, in order to match treatments. The MATCH trial (NCT02286141) evaluated the effect of implementing an adaptation of this approach in a United States healthcare setting.

Purpose of Study and Background

Population ageing will facilitate an increase in health problems common in older adults, such as musculoskeletal conditions. Musculoskeletal conditions are the fourth largest contributor to disease burden in older adults; affecting quality of life, physical activity, mental wellbeing and independence. Therefore primary care health services must provide appropriate and efficacious management and treatment. However there are a number of complexities specific to older adults that are essential to address.

This study aimed to assess the effect of flexion and external rotation on measurement of femoral offset (FO), greater trochanter to femoral head centre (GT-FHC) distance, and neck shaft angle (NSA). Three-dimensional femoral shapes (n=100) were generated by statistical shape modelling from 47 CT-segmented right femora. Combined rotations in the range of 0–50° external and 0–50° flexion (in 10° increments) were applied to each femur after they were neutralised (defined as neck and proximal shaft axis parallel with detector plane). Each shape was projected to create 2D images representing radiographs of the proximal femora.

As already known, external rotation resulted in a significant error in measuring FO but flexion alone had no impact. Individually, neither flexion nor external rotation had any impact on GT-FHC but, for example, 30° of flexion combined with 50°of external rotation resulted in an 18.6mm change in height. NSA averaged 125° in neutral with external rotation resulting in a moderate increase and flexion on its own a moderate decrease. However, 50° degrees of both produced an almost 30 degree increase in NSA.

In conclusion, although the relationship between external rotation and FO is appreciated, the impact of flexion with external rotation is not. This combination results in apparent reduced FO, a high femoral head centre and an increased NSA. Femoral components with NSAs of 130° or 135° may historically have been based on X-ray misinterpretation. This work demonstrates that 2D to 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur in pre-op planning is a challenge.

Unknown femur orientation during X-ray imaging may cause inaccurate radiographic measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of 3D femur orientation during radiographic imaging on the measurement of greater trochanter to femoral head centre (GT-FHC) distance.

Three-dimensional femoral shapes (n=100) of unknown gender were generated using a statistical shape model based on a training data of 47 CT segmented femora. Rotations in the range of 0° internal to 50° external and 50° of flexion to 0° of extension (at 10 degree increments) were applied to each femur. A ray tracing algorithm was then used to create 2D images representing radiographs of the femora in known 3D orientations. The GT-FHC distance was then measured automatically by identifying the femoral head, shaft axis and tip of greater trochanter.

Uniaxial rotations had little impact on the measurement with mean absolute error of 0.6 mm and 3.1 mm for 50° for pure external rotation and 50° pure flexion, respectively. Combined flexion and external rotation yielded more significant errors with 10° around each axis introducing a mean error of 3.6 mm and 20° showing an average error of 8.8 mm (Figure 1.). In the cohort we studied, when the femur was in neutral orientation, the tip of greater trochanter was never below the femoral head centre.

Greater trochanter to femoral head centre measurement was insensitive to rotations around a single axis (i.e. flexion or external rotation). Modest combined rotations caused the tip of greater trochanter to appear more distal in 2D and led to deviation from the true value. This study suggests that a radiograph with the greater trochanter appearing below femoral head centre may have been acquired with 3D rotation of the femur.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ above to access author contact details.

Aims

Our aim was to examine the clinical and radiographic outcomes in 257 consecutive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKAs) (238 patients), five years post-operatively.

Anterior-posterior (AP) x-rays are routinely taken following total hip replacement to assess placement and orientation of implanted components. Pelvic orientation at the time of an AP x-ray can influence projected implant orientation.¹However, the extent of pelvic orientation varies between patients.²Without compensation for patient specific pelvic orientation, misleading measurements for implant orientation may be obtained. These measurements are used as indicators for post-operative dislocation stability and range of motion. Errors in which could result in differences between expectations and the true outcome achieved. The aim of this research was to develop a tool that could be utilised to determine pelvic orientation from an AP x-ray.

An algorithm based on comparing projections of a statistical shape model of the pelvis (n=20) with the target X-ray was developed in MATLAB. For each iteration, the average shape was adjusted, rotated (to account for patient-specific pelvic orientation), projected onto a 2D plane, and the simulated outline determined. With respect to rotation, the pelvis was allowed to rotate about its transverse axis (pelvic flexion/extension) and anterior-posterior axis (pelvic adduction/abduction). Minimum root mean square error between the outline of the pelvis from the X-ray and the projected shape model outline was used to select final values for flexion and adduction. To test the algorithm, virtual X-rays (n=6) of different pelvis in known orientations were created using the algorithm described by Freud et al.³The true pelvic orientation for each case was randomly generated. Angular error was defined as the difference between the true pelvic orientation and that selected by the algorithm.

Initial testing has exhibited similar accuracy in determining true pelvic flexion (x̄_error = 2.74°, σ_error=±2.21°) and true pelvic adduction (x̄_error = 2.38°, σ_error=±1.76°). For both pelvic flexion and adduction the maximum angular error observed was 5.62°. The minimum angular error for pelvic flexion was 0.37°, whilst for pelvic adduction it was 1.08°.

Although the algorithm is still under development, the low mean, maximum, and standard deviations of error from initial testing indicate the approach is promising. Ongoing work will involve the use of additional landmarks for registration and training shapes to improve the shape model. This tool will allow surgeons to more accurately determine true acetabular orientation relative to the pelvis without the use of additional x-ray views or CT scans. In turn, this will help improve diagnoses of post-operative range of motion and dislocation stability.

Introduction

The results of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) vary with data from the UK national Joint Registry being less favourable than that from the Australian registry. The senior author started using a fully cementless THA in 2005 and we aimed to gauge the performance of the implants based on their revision data.

Aims

The aim of this study was to present data on 11 459 patients who underwent total hip (THA), total knee (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between November 2002 and April 2014 with aspirin as the primary agent for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

Purpose and Background:

To identify treatment effect modifiers within the STarT Back Trial which demonstrated prognostic stratified care was effective in comparison to standard care for patients with low back pain.

Background:

Internet interventions provide an opportunity to encourage patients with LBP to self-manage and remain active, by tailoring advice and providing evidence-based support for increasing physical activity. This paper reports the development of the ‘SupportBack’ internet intervention, designed for use with usual primary care, as the first stage of a feasibility RCT currently underway comparing: usual primary care alone; usual care plus the internet intervention; usual care plus the internet intervention with physiotherapist telephone support.

Joint aspiration is a useful tool during preoperative workup in suspected periprosthetic infection. The aim of this study was to review efficacy of joint aspiration in our unit and compare results with the published literature.

We undertook a retrospective review of 153 consecutive patients who underwent joint aspirations for suspected periprosthetic infection between 03/2011 and 10/2012 who were identified from the hospital electronic database. As per protocol, joint fluid was sent in an EDTA tube for cell count, Paediatric blood culture bottle and the remainder in a specimen pot.

105 (69%) were TKRs and 48 (31%) were THRs. Intraoperative samples were sent as per protocol in only 40 (26%) cases. The hit rate of positive cultures was 11/153 (7%) and specimens sent in paediatric culture bottles identified more positives than if it was omitted (10.5 Vs 5.5%).

In conclusion, the hit rate of positive cultures is low in this study compared to the literature (7% Vs 33%) and this is likely due to blanket aspiration of all patients who are undergoing revision. In addition, specimens sent in paediatric culture bottles seem to identify more positives. We recommend cases are selected for aspiration according to AAOS guidelines.

Objective

The STarT Back Screening Tool (STarT) is a 9-item patient self-report questionnaire that classifies low back pain patients into low, medium or high risk of poor prognosis. When assessed by GPs, these subgroups can be used to triage patients into different evidence-based treatment pathways. The objective of this study was to translate the English version of STarT into Danish (STarT-dk) and test its discriminative validity.

Background

One untested back pain treatment model is to stratify management depending on prognosis (low, medium or high-risk). This 2-arm RCT investigated: (i) overall clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified primary care (intervention), versus non-stratified current best practice (control); and (ii) whether low-risk patients had non-inferior outcomes, and medium/high-risk groups had superior outcomes.

Introduction

The STarT Back trial demonstrated that targeting back pain treatment according to patient prognosis (low, medium or high-risk subgroups) is effective. However, the mechanisms leading to these improved treatment outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to identify which psychological variables included in the study were mediating treatment outcome for all patients and within the low, medium and high-risk subgroups.

Following the publication in 2007 of the guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) for patients undergoing surgery, concerns were raised by British orthopaedic surgeons as to the appropriateness of the recommendations for their clinical practice. In order to address these concerns NICE and the British Orthopaedic Association agreed to engage a representative panel of orthopaedic surgeons in the process of developing expanded VTE guidelines applicable to all patients admitted to hospital. The functions of this panel were to review the evidence and to consider the applicability and implications in orthopaedic practice in order to advise the main Guideline Development Group in framing recommendations.

The panel considered both direct and indirect evidence of the safety and efficacy, the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis and its implication in clinical practice for orthopaedic patients. We describe the process of selection of the orthopaedic panel, the evidence considered and the contribution of the panel to the latest guidelines from NICE on the prophylaxis against VTE, published in January 2010.

Introduction: Detecting relevant clinical subgroups of patients with non-specific LBP is a priority for research as it has potential for improving treatment effectiveness. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) was recently developed and validated to subgroup LBP patients into targeted treatment pathways in primary care. This study tested the SBT’s criterion validity against a popular existing LBP subgrouping tool – the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ).

Methods: 244 consecutive ‘non-specific’ LBP consulters at 8 GP practices aged 18–59 years were invited to complete a questionnaire. Measures included the OMPSQ & SBT; disability (RMDQ); pain intensity (11-item NRS); duration of symptoms; and demographics. Instruments were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation, discriminant analysis of subgroups, tests for allocation agreement and predictive validity using published data.

Results: Completed SBT (9-items) and OMPSQ (24-items) data was available for 130/244 patients (53%). The correlation of SBT and OMPSQ scores was ‘excellent (rs = 0.80, p=< 0.001). Subgroup characteristics from both tools were similar particularly among the ‘low’ risk groups, however, the proportion of patients allocated to ‘low’, ‘medium’ and ‘high’ risk groups were different, with more distressed patients in the SBT’s high risk group. The SBT better predicted pain and disability at 6 months and both equally predicted time off work.

Conclusion: The SBT psychometric properties perform as well or better than the OMPSQ, but the SBT is shorter and easier to score. It is therefore an appropriate alternative for screening LBP patients in primary care.

Background: Last year we presented the STarT Back Tool, which is validated for use in Primary Care. It subgroups patients into 3 categories (high, medium and low risk) on the basis of modifiable risk factors for chronicity. We are now piloting the feasibility of using the tool as part of a new approach to sub-grouping and targeting back pain in primary care.

Methods: The physiotherapy interventions for the 3 subgroups were developed after reviewing the literature, current guidelines, the content of existing targeted treatment programmes, and convening workshops with internationally recognised experts. Both the intervention training modules, and the targeted treatments were piloted. Consecutive back pain consulters were identified using GP electronic Read Codes (weekly downloads) and invited to attend the study’s back pain clinic. Consenting patients completed a baseline questionnaire and were classified by the tool into one of 3 sub-groups.

Results: 60 patients were recruited. 50 patients were allocated to receive treatment according to their subgroup allocation and 10 patients (control group) received a triage physiotherapy assessment (usual care) to decide if they needed further physiotherapy treatment. Primary outcomes include the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Pain Catastrophising Scale. Three-month follow-up postal questionnaires are currently being administered and outcomes will be presented at the conference. Clinicians involved (GPs, and physiotherapists) will be interviewed to identify the feasibility of this approach.

Conclusions: Once feasibility is established we will take this developmental work forwards into the clinical trial arena to investigate whether this novel “sub-grouping for targeted treatment” approach provides a cost effective way of reducing long-term risk of chronic disability in patients consulting their GP with back pain.

Background: Patients with LBP, ‘at risk’ of persistent symptoms, require targeted treatment in primary care. We have therefore developed and validated a new screening tool to classify these patients into appropriate management groups.

Methods: A list of LBP prognostic indicators was compiled by reviewing published studies and analysing existing datasets. Indicators were selected for the tool according to face and construct validity, consistency and strength of association. For each indicator outcome measure (e.g. Pain Catastrophising Scale) an individual question (e.g. ‘I feel that my back pain is terrible and that it is never going to get an better’) was selected for inclusion (ROC analysis). The tool was modelled to classify patients into 3 categories of risk. The screening tool and corresponding complete scales were mailed to 244 consecutive primary care LBP consulters. Individual items were validated against complete scales. Reliability was examined on 53 responders.

Results: This new screening tool classifies patients using 9-items to cover 8 key prognostic indicators. The questionnaires returned by 131 consulters demonstrated excellent construct validity for all individual items. 33% of patients were classified as ‘high risk’ (psychosocial and physical factors), 44% ‘intermediate risk’ (physical factors alone) and 23% ‘low risk’. Discrimination between groups across relevant constructs such as pain, disability, days off work and psychological distress was highly significant. Test-retest reliability was moderate (kappa = 0.54).

Conclusions: A novel LBP screening tool has been validated in primary care and effectively classifies patients ‘at risk’ of persistent symptoms. This will facilitate appropriate targeting of treatment.

The diffusion of Fucidin, gentamicin, and clindamycin from acrylic cement was tested in an in vitro system. The activity of Fucidin was very short-lived and only against gram-positive organisms; gentamicin inhibited gram-positive and gram-negative organisms for twenty-two and eleven days respectively; clindamycin had significant action only against gram-positive organisms and retained some activity for fifty-six days. We suggest that the destruction of organisms in the tissues is more likely to be achieved by topical and intravenous administration of antibiotics during the operation than by incorporation of antibiotic in the cement.