header advert
Results 1 - 29 of 29
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Oct 2019
Hill J Tooth S Cooper V Chen Y Lewis M Wathall S Saunders B Bartlam B Protheroe J Chudyk A Dunn K Foster N
Full Access

Background and aims

The Keele STarT Back approach is effective for stratifying patients with low back pain in primary care, but a similar approach has not been tested with a broader range of patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. We report a feasibility and pilot trial examining the feasibility of a future main trial of a primary care based, risk-stratification (STarT MSK) approach for patients with back, neck, knee, shoulder or multi-site pain.

Methods

A pragmatic, two-parallel arm, cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) in 8 GP practices (4 stratified care involving use of the Keele STarT MSK tool and matched treatment options: 4 usual care). Following screening, adults with one of the five most common MSK pain presentations were invited to take part in data collection over 6 months. Feasibility outcomes included exploration of selection bias, recruitment and follow-up rates, clinician engagement with using the Keele STarT MSK tool and matching patients to treatments.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Oct 2019
Konstantinou K Lewis M Dunn K Hill J Artus M Foster N
Full Access

Background and Purpose

Healthcare for sciatica is usually ‘stepped’ with initial advice and analgesia, then physiotherapy, then more invasive interventions if symptoms continue. The SCOPiC trial tested a stratified care algorithm combining prognostic and clinical characteristics to allocate patients into one of three groups, with matched care pathways, and compared the effectiveness of stratified care (SC) with non-stratified, usual care (UC).

Methods

Pragmatic two-parallel arm RCT with 476 adults recruited from 42 GP practices and randomised (1:1) to either SC or UC (238 per arm). In SC, participants in group 1 were offered up to 2 advice/treatment sessions with a physiotherapist, group 2 were offered up to 6 physiotherapy sessions, and group 3 was ‘fast-tracked’ to MRI and spinal specialist opinion. Primary outcome was time to first resolution of sciatica symptoms (6-point ordinal scale) collected via text messages. Secondary outcomes (4 and 12 months) included leg and back pain intensity, physical function, psychological status, time-off-work, satisfaction with care. Primary analysis was by intention to treat.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 20 - 20
1 Sep 2019
Harrisson S Ogollah R Dunn K Foster N Konstantinou K
Full Access

Background

Medication prescribing patterns for patients with neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) in primary care are unknown.

Purpose

To estimate the proportion of patients prescribed pain medications, describe baseline characteristics of patients prescribed neuropathic pain (NP) medication and estimate the proportion of LBLP patients with refractory NP.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 30 - 30
1 Sep 2019
Harrisson S Ogollah R Dunn K Foster N Konstantinou K
Full Access

Background

There is a paucity of prognosis research in patients with neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) in primary care.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical course and prognostic factors in primary care LBLP patients consulting with neuropathic pain (NP).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2018
Chen Y Campbell P Strauss V Foster N Jordan K Dunn K
Full Access

Background and objectives

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health challenge globally. Research has identified common trajectories of pain over time. We aimed to investigate whether trajectories described in one primary care cohort can be confirmed in another, and to determine the prognostic value of factors collected 5 years prior to the identification of the trajectory.

Methods and results

The study was carried out on 281 patients who had consulted primary care for LBP, at that point completed a baseline questionnaire, and then returned a questionnaire at 5-years follow-up plus at least 3 (of 6) subsequent monthly questionnaires. Baseline factors were measured using validated tools. Pain intensity scores from the 5-year follow-up and monthly questionnaires were used to cluster participants into 4 previously derived pain trajectories (no or occasional mild, persistent mild, fluctuating, persistent severe), using latent class analysis. Posterior probabilities of belonging to each cluster were estimated for each participant. The posterior probabilities for the assigned clusters were very high (>0.90) for each cluster except for the smallest ‘fluctuating’ cluster (0.74). Lower social class (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.2, 7.0), higher pain intensity (1.6 per unit; 1.2, 2.2), and pain duration greater than 3 years (2.7; 1.0, 7.3), were significantly associated with a more severe trajectory 5-years later, as were higher physical disability, emotional impact of pain, and perception pain will last a long time.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Feb 2018
Harrisson S Ogollah R Dunn K Foster N Konstantinou K
Full Access

Background

Patients with low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can present with neuropathic pain; it is not known but is often assumed that neuropathic pain persists over time. This research aimed to identify cases with neuropathic pain that persisted at short, intermediate and longer-term time points, in LBLP patients consulting in primary care.

Methods

LBLP patients in a primary care cohort study (n=606) completed the self-report version of Leeds Assessment for Neurological Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS, score of ≥12 indicates possible neuropathic pain) at baseline, 4-months, 12-months and 3-years. S-LANSS scores and percentages of patients with score of ≥12 are described at each time-point. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 17 - 17
1 May 2017
Stynes S Konstantinou K Ogollah R Hay E Dunn K
Full Access

Background

Low back-related leg pain (LBLP) is clinically diagnosed as referred leg pain or sciatica. Within the spectrum of LBLP there may be unrecognised subgroups of patients. This study aimed to identify and describe clusters of LBLP patients using latent class analysis (LCA).

Methods

The study population were 609 LBLP primary care consulters. Variables from clinical assessment were included in the LCA. Characteristics of the statistically identified clusters were described and compared to the clinically defined groups of LBLP patients.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 16 - 16
1 May 2017
Harrisson S Ogollah R Dunn K Foster N Konstantinou K
Full Access

Purpose of study and background

Neuropathic pain is a challenging pain syndrome to manage. Low back-related leg pain (LBLP) is clinically diagnosed as either sciatica or referred leg pain and sciatica is often assumed to be neuropathic. Our aim was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain in LBLP patients.

Methods

Analysis of cross-sectional data from a prospective, primary care cohort of 609 LBLP patients. Patients completed questionnaires, and received clinical assessment including MRI. Neuropathic characteristics (NC) were measured using the self-report version of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs scale (SLANSS; score of ≥12 indicates pain with NC).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Feb 2016
Beneciuk J Hill J Campbell P George S Afolabi E Dunn K Foster N
Full Access

Purpose and Background:

To identify treatment effect modifiers within the STarT Back Trial which demonstrated prognostic stratified care was effective in comparison to standard care for patients with low back pain.

Methods:

Secondary analysis of the STarT Back Trial using 688 patients with available 4-month follow-up data. Disability (baseline and 4 months) was assessed using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) using continuous and dichotomized (>7) outcome scores. Potential treatment effect modifiers were evaluated with group x predictor interaction terms using linear and logistic regression models. Modifiers included: age, gender, education, socio-economic status (SES), employment status, work satisfaction, episode duration, general health (SF-12), number of pain medications, and treatment expectations.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 26 - 26
1 Feb 2016
Stynes S Konstantinou K Ogollah R Hay E Dunn K
Full Access

Background:

Identification of nerve root involvement (NRI) in patients with low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can be challenging. Diagnostic models have mainly been developed in secondary care with conflicting reference standards and predictor selection. This study aims to ascertain which cluster of items from clinical assessment best identify NRI in primary care consulters with LBLP

Methods:

Cross-sectional data on 395 LBLP consulters were analysed. Potential NRI indicators were seven clinical assessment items. Two definitions of NRI formed the reference standards: (i) high confidence (≥80%) NRI clinical diagnosis (ii) high confidence (≥80%) NRI clinical diagnosis with confirmatory magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed and compared for both reference standards. Model performances were summarised using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and area under the curve (AUC). Bootstrapping assessed internal validity.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2015
Stynes S Konstantinou K Dunn K
Full Access

Background

Leg pain frequently accompanies low back pain and is associated with increased levels of disability and higher health costs than simple low back pain. Distinguishing between different types of low back- related leg pain (LBLP) is important for clinical management and research applications.

The aim of this systematic review was to identify, describe and appraise papers that classify or subgroup populations with LBLP.

Methods

The search strategy involved nine electronic databases including Medline and Embase, reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews. Selected papers were quality appraised independently by two reviewers using a standardised scoring tool.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Feb 2015
Konstantinou K Dunn K Ogollah R Hay E
Full Access

Background

60% of back pain patients report pain radiation in the leg(s), which is associated with worse symptoms and poorer recovery. The majority are treated in primary care, but detailed information about them is scarce. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients with back and leg pain-seeking treatment in primary care.

Methods

Adult patients consulting their GP with back and leg pain were invited to the study. Participants completed questionnaires including sociodemographic, physical and psychosocial measures. They also underwent standardised clinical assessments by physiotherapists, and received an MRI scan.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Feb 2014
Stynes S Konstantinou K Dunn K Lewis M Hay E
Full Access

Background

Pain with radiation to the leg is a common presentation in back pain patients. Radiating leg pain is either referred pain or radicular, commonly described as sciatica. Clinically distinguishing between these types of leg pain is recognized as difficult but important for management purposes. The aim of this study was to investigate inter-therapist agreement when diagnosing referred or radicular pain.

Methods

Thirty-six primary care consulters with low back-related leg pain were assessed and diagnosed as referred or radicular leg pain by one of six trained experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapists. Assessments were videoed, excluding any diagnosis discourse, and viewed by a second physiotherapist who made an independent diagnosis. Therapists rated their confidence with diagnosis and reasons for their decision. Data was summarized using percentage agreements and kappa (K) coefficients with two sided 95% confidence intervals (CI).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Apr 2013
Campbell P Bishop A Dunn K Main C Thomas E Foster N
Full Access

Background

A wide array of measures has been developed to assess the role of psychological factors in the development and persistence of pain. Yet there is likely to be considerable conceptual overlap between such measures, and consequently a lack of clarity about the importance of psychological factors.

Purpose

To investigate whether conceptual overlap exists within psychological measures used in back pain research.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2013
Campbell P Foster N Thomas E Dunn K
Full Access

Background

People with back pain often experience long-term pain with recurrences and fluctuations. However, few studies have considered which factors predict long-term outcomes.

Purpose

To determine the prognostic factors, measured around the time of a primary care back pain consultation, that predict clinically significant pain in both the short (6 months) and long-term (5 years).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Jan 2013
Hill J Whitehurst D Lewis M Bryan S Dunn K Foster N Konstantinou K Main C Mason E Somerville S Sowden G Vohora K Hay E
Full Access

Background

One untested back pain treatment model is to stratify management depending on prognosis (low, medium or high-risk). This 2-arm RCT investigated: (i) overall clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified primary care (intervention), versus non-stratified current best practice (control); and (ii) whether low-risk patients had non-inferior outcomes, and medium/high-risk groups had superior outcomes.

Methods

1573 adults with back pain (+/− radiculopathy) consulting at 10 general practices in England responded to invitations to attend an assessment clinic, at which 851 eligible participants were randomised (intervention n=568; control n=283). Primary outcome using intention-to-treat analysis was the difference in change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included 4-month RMDQ change between arms overall, and at risk-group level at both time-points. The economic evaluation estimated incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and back pain-related health care costs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_IX | Pages 85 - 85
1 Mar 2012
Odumenya M Dunn K Spalding T Thompson PJM
Full Access

Purpose of Study

To identify the early functional outcomes, survivorship and complications associated with the Corin Uniglide Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKRs) from an independent centre.

Methods and Results

A prospective consecutive case series of sixty Uniglide UKRs was carried out in fifty-one patients between January 2006 and March 2009. The data collected included:

Primary outcome measures:

Pre- and post-operative American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Scores (OKS), WOMAC

Survivorship

Secondary outcome measures:

X-ray error scores assessing component position

Complications

No cases were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 19 months (12 to 36months) and mean age was 66 years (39 to 78 years).

Kaplan-Meier Survivorship showed 95% survival at 3 years (CI:6.4).

All functional outcomes showed significant improvement p <0.05. There were two revisions within the first year, which were the main complications, secondary to aseptic tibial loosening and collapse of the posteromedial tibia. The x-ray error score identified the most common error as the femoral flexion/extension angle followed by the anterior/posterior fit.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 15 - 15
1 Jan 2012
Grotle M Foster N Dunn K Croft P
Full Access

Purpose

To compare the contribution of physical, psychological and social indicators to predicting disability after one year between consulters with low back pain (LBP) of less than 3 months duration and more than 3 months duration.

Methods

Data from two large prospective cohort studies of consecutive patients consulting with LBP in general practices were merged, with disability measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). There were complete data for 258 cases with acute/subacute LBP and 668 cases with chronic LBP at 12 months follow-up. Univariate and adjusted multivariate regression analyses of various potential prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months were carried out.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 5 - 5
1 Jan 2012
Konstantinou K Hider S Jordan J Lewis M Dunn K Hay E
Full Access

Purpose and background

Although low back pain (LBP) with leg pain, is considered by most a poor prognostic indicator, it is at the same time believed to have a favourable natural resolution, and is often treated along similar lines to non-specific LBP, in line with current guidelines. It is unclear whether patients with LBP and leg pain are a distinct subgroup that might benefit from early identification and targeted interventions. We set out to investigate the impact of LBP with leg pain on health outcomes and health resources compared with that of LBP alone, and to explore which factors contribute to the observed disability outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search of all English language peer reviewed publications was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL for the years 1994 to 2009.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 11 - 11
1 Jan 2012
Dunn K Jordan KP Mancl L Drangsholt M LeResche L
Full Access

Background and purpose

Trajectories of change over time can illustrate the course of pain. Back pain trajectories have previously been identified among adults. Understanding different patterns of back pain among adolescents could shed light on how persistent back pain develops. We aimed to identify and compare trajectories of back pain among adolescents in the general population.

Methods and results

This prospective cohort study followed 1,336 adolescents (initially aged 11 years) every three months for three years, using self-completion questionnaires. Latent class growth analysis was used to cluster subjects into distinct trajectories of back pain. Six clusters were identified. Most subjects (78%) had very low likelihood of back pain throughout follow-up. The second largest cluster (10%) had relatively low and falling probability of back pain. Two clusters (4% each) showed increasing probability of back pain. One cluster had a peak likelihood of pain around age 13 (2%). The smallest cluster (1%) had very high probability of back pain throughout follow-up. The more painful trajectories had significantly fewer males, higher levels of depression and somatization, and lower life satisfaction at baseline, but differed little in physical activity or BMI.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 16 - 16
1 Jan 2012
Campbell P Jordan K Dunn K
Full Access

Background

Social context may be important in chronic pain. One focus is reactions to pain between persons with LBP and their partners. Researchers have investigated partner reactions and found influences on pain levels and psychological outcomes, but little is known about factors underpinning these reactions.

Aim

To investigate the associations of relationship quality and perceived partner responses with LBP intensity and disability.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 491 - 491
1 Nov 2011
Ashworth J Konstantinou K Dunn K
Full Access

Background: Sciatica is an important cause of pain and disability but relatively few studies have looked at predictors of outcome in sciatica populations. Prognostic studies in non-specific low back pain are more common, but it has been suggested that the prognostic indicators for sciatica may be different. Our aim was to systematically review and describe the literature investigating the predictors of outcome in sciatica populations.

Methods: A systematic literature search of the databases (Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL) and reference list of identified articles was conducted. Studies were included if they described subjects with sciatica, had a follow-up period of at least three months and measured outcomes including pain, disability, recovery, psychological outcomes or return to work. Methodological quality was assessed using a 15 item checklist.

Results: 596 papers were identified but only 12 met the criteria for inclusion. A combination of individual (e.g. gender, BMI), biomedical (e.g. size of disc prolapse, neurological deficit), social (e.g. job satisfaction, social status, manual labour) and psychological (distress, mental health) predictors of outcome were reported.

Conclusions: There are few high quality studies that have investigated prognostic factors associated with persistence of sciatic symptoms. Those identified explored a range of different factors, in a variety of settings and in subjects with variable duration of symptoms. Although the studies are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity of the techniques used in analysis and presentation, they seem to suggest that clinical, occupational and individual factors might be more strongly associated with outcome than psychological factors in sciatica populations.

Conflicts of Interest: None

Funding: None


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 32 - 32
1 Jan 2011
Kearney R Dunn K Modi C Costa M
Full Access

A key factor delaying rehabilitation after a tendo Achillis (TA) rupture is gait abnormality. We quantified changes in planter pressures after a rupture of the TA in four groups of patients:

15 controls subjects, mean 40 years, with no history of lower limb abnormality

14 patients, mean 48 years, treated in a non-weight-bearing plaster cast

12 patients, mean age 45 years, treated with immediate weight-bearing in a ‘rigid’ orthosis.

14 patients, mean age 51 years, treated with immediate weight-bearing in a ‘flexible’ orthosis.

Mean and maximum peak planter pressures within the forefoot and heel were measured using in-shoe pressure pads two weeks after removal of the cast/orthosis; five gait cycles were recorded. The terminal stance and pre-swing phases were also measured as a proportion of the total stance phase of the gait cycle. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the difference in means between the groups.

The normal control group had less than 2% difference between the limbs on all of the measured parameters. The patients in the plaster cast and ‘rigid’ orthotic groups had significant deficits (p = 0.04 and < 0.001 compared to control) in mean peak forefoot pressures, implying weakness in the triceps surae. However, the patients in the flexible orthosis group had only an 11% deficit (p = 0.25 compared to control). All of the patients treated for a TA rupture had increased heel pressures but only the ‘rigid’ orthotic group had cadence abnormalities (p = < 0.001). This may be the result of abnormal motor patterns secondary to mobilising in the rigid orthosis.

This study highlights the gait abnormalities associated with triceps surae weakness following rupture of the TA. Accelerated rehabilitation using weight-bearing orthotics may alleviate some of these problems, but new designs for flexible orthotics may be required for maximum benefit.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 236 - 236
1 Mar 2010
Dunn K Croft P
Full Access

Background: LBP Epidemiological studies have identified important causal and prognostic factors, but these frequently only identify a proportion of the variance, and new factors add little to these models. Recently, interest has increased in studying diseases over the lifecourse, a move accompanied by crucial conceptual and methodological developments. This has resulted in improvements in the understanding of conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory disease.

Aim: To examine how conceptual frameworks from lifecourse epidemiology could enhance LBP research.

Method and Results: Concept 1: patterns over time, risk chains and accumulation. Simple ‘chains of risk’ have been studied, e.g. depression leading to LBP, but studies involving more risk factors in the chain are infrequent. Also, we have not examined how risk accumulation influences outcome, e.g. whether multiple episodes or duration of depression, throughout the lifecourse, better predicts LBP. One-year LBP trajectories have been described, but descriptions of longer-term patterns with associated transitions and turning points are lacking. Concept 2: influences and determinants of pathways. LBP studies commonly adjust for confounders, but factors modifying risk, or related to resilience or susceptibility to LBP, are rarely studied. Concept 3: timing of risk. Studies of critical or sensitive periods – crucial times of life which influence later health in life – are scarce in LBP research.

Conclusion: LBP researchers should develop hypotheses and models of how risks from different stages of life might interact and influence the onset, persistence and prognosis of LBP throughout the lifecourse. Adoption of concepts and methods from lifecourse epidemiology could facilitate this.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 237 - 237
1 Mar 2010
Zadurian N Dunn K Foster N Main C
Full Access

Background: Many studies have investigated predictors of outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients, including the role of coping. However, the relative importance of different coping strategies is unclear.

Objective: To systematically review prospective cohort studies to determine the role of specific coping strategies in the prediction of LBP outcome in primary care settings.

Methods: Medline, PsychINFO, and Embase electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2008. Prospective cohort studies focusing on aspects of coping with LBP in settings relevant to primary care were included. Studies were excluded if they focused on specific populations (e.g. nursing staff) or patients aged under 18 years, or if they were not published in English. Prior to data extraction, studies were quality assessed and coping strategies were conceptualised as either cognitive or behavioural.

Results: 782 potentially relevant articles were identified, of which 34 were included with an average follow-up of 10 months. There was considerable variability in the prognostic risk factors measured. Fear avoidance beliefs were most frequently associated with outcome. Negative affect, anxiety and depression, use of active or passive coping strategies, and catastrophizing were also commonly associated with outcome. Behavioural coping strategies were measured by only 5 of the 34 studies.

Conclusion: Despite considerable heterogeneity, most studies were of acceptable quality, enabling the identification of several key coping strategies predictive of LBP outcome. However, the majority of studies focused on cognitive coping factors only. Therefore further research is needed, particularly to investigate the influence of behavioural coping strategies on LBP outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 234 - 234
1 Mar 2010
Hill J Dunn K Hay E
Full Access

Introduction: Detecting relevant clinical subgroups of patients with non-specific LBP is a priority for research as it has potential for improving treatment effectiveness. The STarT Back Tool (SBT) was recently developed and validated to subgroup LBP patients into targeted treatment pathways in primary care. This study tested the SBT’s criterion validity against a popular existing LBP subgrouping tool – the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ).

Methods: 244 consecutive ‘non-specific’ LBP consulters at 8 GP practices aged 18–59 years were invited to complete a questionnaire. Measures included the OMPSQ & SBT; disability (RMDQ); pain intensity (11-item NRS); duration of symptoms; and demographics. Instruments were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation, discriminant analysis of subgroups, tests for allocation agreement and predictive validity using published data.

Results: Completed SBT (9-items) and OMPSQ (24-items) data was available for 130/244 patients (53%). The correlation of SBT and OMPSQ scores was ‘excellent (rs = 0.80, p=< 0.001). Subgroup characteristics from both tools were similar particularly among the ‘low’ risk groups, however, the proportion of patients allocated to ‘low’, ‘medium’ and ‘high’ risk groups were different, with more distressed patients in the SBT’s high risk group. The SBT better predicted pain and disability at 6 months and both equally predicted time off work.

Conclusion: The SBT psychometric properties perform as well or better than the OMPSQ, but the SBT is shorter and easier to score. It is therefore an appropriate alternative for screening LBP patients in primary care.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 490 - 490
1 Aug 2008
Hill J Konstantinou K Mason E Sowden G Vohora C Dunn K Main C Hay E
Full Access

Background: Last year we presented the STarT Back Tool, which is validated for use in Primary Care. It subgroups patients into 3 categories (high, medium and low risk) on the basis of modifiable risk factors for chronicity. We are now piloting the feasibility of using the tool as part of a new approach to sub-grouping and targeting back pain in primary care.

Methods: The physiotherapy interventions for the 3 subgroups were developed after reviewing the literature, current guidelines, the content of existing targeted treatment programmes, and convening workshops with internationally recognised experts. Both the intervention training modules, and the targeted treatments were piloted. Consecutive back pain consulters were identified using GP electronic Read Codes (weekly downloads) and invited to attend the study’s back pain clinic. Consenting patients completed a baseline questionnaire and were classified by the tool into one of 3 sub-groups.

Results: 60 patients were recruited. 50 patients were allocated to receive treatment according to their subgroup allocation and 10 patients (control group) received a triage physiotherapy assessment (usual care) to decide if they needed further physiotherapy treatment. Primary outcomes include the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Pain Catastrophising Scale. Three-month follow-up postal questionnaires are currently being administered and outcomes will be presented at the conference. Clinicians involved (GPs, and physiotherapists) will be interviewed to identify the feasibility of this approach.

Conclusions: Once feasibility is established we will take this developmental work forwards into the clinical trial arena to investigate whether this novel “sub-grouping for targeted treatment” approach provides a cost effective way of reducing long-term risk of chronic disability in patients consulting their GP with back pain.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 487 - 487
1 Aug 2008
Wynne-Jones G Dunn K Main C
Full Access

Background: Most reports of sickness absence come either from company records, which are limited to specific workforces, or rely on self-report. Electronic recording of sickness certification in primary care medical records provides an alternative source of information.

Purpose: To investigate the validity of electronic sickness certification records in primary care.

Methods: Analysis included 292 primary care LBP consulters, who returned a questionnaire including self-reported work absence, and consented to medical record review. Sickness certification records for 2001–2 were downloaded. Self-reported sickness absence for the previous 2-weeks was matched with electronic records for the same time period. Records were considered to match if there was no reported absence and no certificate, if there was reported absence > =7 days and a certificate, or if reported absence was < 7 days and no certificate was issued.

Results: Overall, 84% of records matched; 87% of employed consulters and 90% of unemployed consulters. Among the employed, 100% of reports of no absence did not have a certificate, 49% of reported absences > =7 days were matched by a certificate for the same time period and lastly, 80% of reported absences of < 7 days did not have a certificate.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that people with none or short self-reported work absences do not have sickness certificates in their records, but only a small proportion of people with longer self-reported absences appear to have certificates. Further work will investigate possible reasons for non-matching, these may include non-requirement of a certificate, recall errors or incomplete recording of sickness certificates.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 219 - 219
1 Jul 2008
Hill J Dunn K Mullis R Lewis M Main C Hay E
Full Access

Background: Patients with LBP, ‘at risk’ of persistent symptoms, require targeted treatment in primary care. We have therefore developed and validated a new screening tool to classify these patients into appropriate management groups.

Methods: A list of LBP prognostic indicators was compiled by reviewing published studies and analysing existing datasets. Indicators were selected for the tool according to face and construct validity, consistency and strength of association. For each indicator outcome measure (e.g. Pain Catastrophising Scale) an individual question (e.g. ‘I feel that my back pain is terrible and that it is never going to get an better’) was selected for inclusion (ROC analysis). The tool was modelled to classify patients into 3 categories of risk. The screening tool and corresponding complete scales were mailed to 244 consecutive primary care LBP consulters. Individual items were validated against complete scales. Reliability was examined on 53 responders.

Results: This new screening tool classifies patients using 9-items to cover 8 key prognostic indicators. The questionnaires returned by 131 consulters demonstrated excellent construct validity for all individual items. 33% of patients were classified as ‘high risk’ (psychosocial and physical factors), 44% ‘intermediate risk’ (physical factors alone) and 23% ‘low risk’. Discrimination between groups across relevant constructs such as pain, disability, days off work and psychological distress was highly significant. Test-retest reliability was moderate (kappa = 0.54).

Conclusions: A novel LBP screening tool has been validated in primary care and effectively classifies patients ‘at risk’ of persistent symptoms. This will facilitate appropriate targeting of treatment.