Purpose: To see if current guidelines for the early diagnosis of sarcomas can be improved.

Method: Data on 1100 patients referred to our unit with a lump suspicious of sarcoma was analyzed to try and identify clinical features more common in malignant than benign lumps. The following five items were analysed: size, history of increasing size, presence of pain, depth, age. For each of these items sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and weights of evidence were collected. ROC curves were used to identify the most sensitive cut off for continuous data.

Results: The best cut off predicting malignancy for size was 8cm and for age 53 years

The weights of evidence (WE) are logs of the likelihood ratios and can be added and a probability then calculated. e.g. a 36 yr old with a 10cm, deep, painless lump that is increasing in size scores −0.39 + 0.4 + 0.4 – 0.11 + 0.58 = 0.88. This equates to a risk of the lump being malignant of 70%.

Conclusion: This analysis shows that increase in size is the strongest predictor of malignancy/benignancy followed by age > 53 and size > 8cm. This data can help formulate strategies for earlier detection of soft tissue sarcomas.

Introduction: A ‘whoops’ procedure is when a lump, which subsequently turns out to be a soft tissue sarcoma (STS), is shelled out by a surgeon who is not aware of the diagnosis. In many cases residual tumour will be left behind necessitating further surgery. The significance of a whoops procedure in terms of survival and local control remains uncertain. This study has used case matched controls to compare outcome between two groups.

Method: 794 patients of soft tissue sarcoma with minimum follow up of 5 years were found on our prospectively collected database. 113 were whoops cases, 96 had restaging and reexcision. An observer blinded to the outcome of patients matched the whoops cases with virgins by known prognostic factors i.e. grade, depth, patient age, site, size and diagnosis of the tumour. We have investigated outcome in terms of local control, metastatic disease and survival by known prognostic factors and by their status at presentation.

Results: 96 patients with a whoops procedure were compared with 96 referred directly to our unit. Despite attempts to match patients with as many variables as possible there was a tendency for the patients with whoops to have smaller tumours that were subcutaneous, they were however well matched for grade and stage at diagnosis. 64% of whoops patients had adequate final margin whereas only 44% of virgins had adequate margins. Overall 1.43 additional operations were needed to achieve final margins for whoops cases as against 0.21% for virgin cases. Overall 27% patients had amputation 20% for whoops and 34% for virgin cases nearly 60% were ray amputations of foot or hand. Overall 50% had radiotherapy and 25% had chemotherapy. There was no statistical difference in local recurrence or survival of patients between whoops and virgins at 5 years follow up. Inadequate margins and residual tumour were significant risk factors for local recurrence and high grade, size more than 5 cm, and age more than 50 years were significant prognostic factors for overall survival of the patients.

Conclusion: Inadvertent surgical excision of a STS is not desirable but does not seem to lead to an adverse outcome in this series in which wide re-excision of the area involved has been carried out.

Purpose; To show that Distal Femoral Endoprosthetic Replacement for metastatic disease can be performed with relatively few complications and allows good pain control and mobilisation for otherwise severely compromised patients.

Method; This is a retrospective study, using the oncology database, patient records and local correspondence, looking at 23 patients with distal femoral metastases who had limb salvage with a Distal Femoral Endoprosthesis (DF EPR).

Results; There were 10 males (43%) and 13 females (57%), mean age 65 (38–84). 13 (57%) had Renal, 6 (26%) Breast and 5 other primaries identified. Five had additional metastases. 8 (35%) had pathological fractures. The mean time for diagnosis of mets was 67 months ranging from 0 (i.e. at the time of primary tumour) to 30 years since the original diagnosis. 15 patients had surgery alone. 3 patients were lost to follow up. 15 patients have diseased at a mean of 26 months (4–58) post op. There was one intra-op and four post-op complications. The majority of the patients were satisfied post op with regards to pain and mobility.

The generally unfavourable prognosis and perceived risks have led surgeons to palliate, stabilise in situ or amputate for distal femoral metastases despite recognised morbidity and life style restrictions. We conclude that DF EPR should be considered as a limb salvage option in patients with distal femoral mets.

Metastatic bone disease resulting in acetabular destruction can provide the orthopaedic surgeon with the difficult challenge of achieving a stable reconstruction of the hip to provide pain relief and restoration of mobility.

We review of twenty patients with metastatic disease requiring major acetabular reconstruction presenting to our orthopaedic oncology unit over a five year period was undertaken. This yielded 15 female and 5 male patients with mean age 59 years. The primary lesion was breast (8 cases), renal (3) prostate (2), myeloma (2) and others (5) with a solitary acetabular metastasis in 75% of cases. Eight patients had received radiotherapy to the region pre-operatively.

In all cases, diseased bone was macroscopically cleared from the pelvis and reconstruction performed by means of a Harrington procedure with threaded pins passed antegrade from the iliac crest 915 cases) or mesh and screws (5 cases), all reinforced with cement around which a total hip arthroplasty was performed.

Mean follow-up was 16 months. Complications were broken pin (1 case), dislocation of femoral prosthesis (1) and deep venous thrombosis (1). Three patients died of their disease at a mean of 12 months from surgery. The remaining 17 patients continue to function at a satisfactory level with no patients having required revision surgery for loosening or deep infection.

We believe that surgical reconstruction of the acetabulum is worthwhile and can provide these deserving patients with improvement in quality of life.

130 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours of the extremity bones treated with resection with or without major endoprosthetic reconstruction were studied retrospectively to determine the indication for surgery, complications, clinical outcome and oncological results of treatment.

The mean age at diagnosis was 61 (22 – 84). The tumours originated from a variety of organs. Lower extremity was involved in 104 and upper extremity in 26. Metastatic disease was solitary in 55 patients and multiple in 75 at the time of surgery. The median follow-up possible from the time of operation to review was 18 months (0–103)

The indication for surgery was radical treatment of solitary metastases with curative intent in 33, pathological fracture in 46, impending fracture in 27, failure of prior fixation devices in 17, painful swelling or extremity in 37. Surgical treatment included excision of expendable bones without reconstruction in 20 patients and resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction in 110 patients. 7 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and the majority received adjuvant radiotherapy.

At the time of review, 58 patients had died at a mean time of 23 months (0–90) from surgery (53 from progressive metastatic disease and 5 from other causes). 72 were alive at mean follow-up of 22 months (1–103) from surgery. 36 patients (28%) were alive at 2 years post-surgery and 8 (6%) at 5 years. One patient died intra-operatively. Post-operative complications occurred in 32 patients (25%). 18 patients required further surgical procedures for dislocation, infection haematoma, stiff joint, plastic surgical procedures. All the patients had control of pain and 90% achieved desired mobility.

There was no difference in the survival of patients who presented with solitary and multiple metastases, renal and non-renal metastases, and upper or lower limb metastases.

We conclude that selected patients with bone metastases can benefit from resection and major bone reconstruction with acceptable morbidity. We have not identified predictable prognostic factors in these selected patients.

Aims: Tumours of the distal humerus are rare but a challenge to treat. Options for treatment are excision and ßail elbow, arthrodesis with considerable shortening, allograft replacement or endoprosthetic replacement (EPR). A retrospective analysis of 10 cases of EPR distal humerus was done to assess their success in treating tumours.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 10 distal humeral tumours operated between 1970 and 2001 was done by retrieving data from notes. No patient was lost to follow up. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was used to assess function in patients still alive.

Results: There were 4 male and 6 female patients, with ages ranging from 15 to 76 years. The period of follow up ranged from 5 months to 31 years. 8 patients had primary tumours and 2 had secondary tumours. 4 out of 10 patients died of metastatic disease 12 to 71 months after operation. None of the 10 patients had local recurrence, infection, amputation or nerve palsy. There were 3 revisions at 48, 56 and 366 months for aseptic loosening. There were 3 rebushings of the plastic inserts at 62,78 and 113 months. Two of the three rebushings were done after revision of the humeral component at 6 months and 30 months. The average TESS Score for these patients was 72.91 out of 100 (29.2 to 93.33).

Conclusion: Custom-made EPR for distal humeral tumours are an effective way of replacing the diseased bone leading to a reasonable level of function and an acceptable failure rate.

Introduction: Many soft tissue sarcomas undergo initial inadequate excision (the Whoops! procedure) and are then referred to specialist services. The outcome of 108 such patients is presented.

Method: Records of 108 patients were traced from the prospectively collected database at our institute who had reexcisions of soft tissue sarcomas. We investigated outcome both in terms of local control and overall survival following treatment to assess the significance of an inadequate initial excision.

Results: Over a ten-year time period we was 887 new patients with soft tissue sarcoma of whom 140 patients (11%) presented following previous inadequate excision. Of these, 108 patients underwent re-excision in an attempt to achieve clear margins. 80% tumours were high grade and 40% were deep. After reexcision, 57% patients were found to have residual tumour. 32% patients had close margins after re-excision. Over all survival of patients was 80% at 5 years and local recurrence rate was 10%. Local recurrence of patients with marginal excision was 15% at 5 years but for clear margins was 6.7%. Of 108 patients 22 (20%) had metastasis at 5 years of which 16.6% were in the lung. 81% of metastasis occurred in patients with close margins of reexcisions. Survival of patients with close margins was worse than wide margins (p = 0.0025).

Conclusion: Local recurrence was statistically associated with grade, depth, margins of re excision and presence of residual tumour. Overall survival was influenced by close margins and residual tumour but not by local recurrence. Re-excision of soft tissue sarcoma to clear margins improves survival of the patients at 5 years.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to analyse survival and prognostic factors in a series of patients treated for pelvic chondrosarcoma.

Material and methods: This series included 67 patients (27 women and 40 men) treated between 1971 and 1996 for pelvic chondrosarcoma. Mean age at diagnosis was 45 years (range 18–78). Forty percent of the tumours were grade I. The most frequent localisation was the iliac bone. Conservative surgery was performed in 45 patients. The only surgical treatment possible in 22 patients was an inter-ilioabdominal disarticulation. Resection margins were adequate for only 19 patients (wide resection). Marginal resection was noted in 14 patients with intra-tumour resection in 17.

Results: Overall 5- and 8-year survival was 65% and 58% respectively. Local recurrence rate was 40%, occurring a mean 27 months after initial surgery. Statistical analysis did not reveal any correlation between tumour size, tumour grade, type of surgery, resection margin, and local recurrence. Results were nevertheless less favourable in case of inadequate surgical margins. Tumour grade, tumour size, patient age, gender, and quality of resection did not have a significant effect on overall survival. Local recurrence was the only negative factor predictive of survival (p< 0.05).

Discussion: Development of local recurrence appears to be the most important negative predictive factor in patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma. In this localisation, satisfactory resection margins are often difficult to achieve. Most authors propose inter-ilioabdominal disarticulation as a last resort procedure. The question of the indication for more aggressive initial surgery to obtain more radical resection margins remains open.

Purpose: Primary bone tumours situated at the distal end of the humerus are exceptional and observed in only 1% of the cases. Reconstruction at this level is often difficult due to the wide bone resection. Choosing a massive prosthesis is an interesting method allowing correct carcinological and functional results. We report a series of ten patients who underwent reconstruction of the lower end of the humerus between 1970 and 2001 with a massive prosthesis after tumour resection.

Material and methods: This series included four men and six women, mean age 51 years (15–76). Eight patients had primary bone tumours and two had secondary bone lesions. Mean follow-up was 79 months (9–372). The custom-made constrained hinge prosthesis composed of chromium-cobalt and titanium was cemented. Regular clinical and radiological follow-up data were recorded. The Henneking score and the Toronto Extremity Survival Score (TESS) were used to assess functional outcome.

Results: Three patients underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the humeral component at 48, 56 and 366 months with problem of polyethylene insert wear for two of them. There were no infctions or local recurrences and no secondary amputations. The posterior or anterolateral approach was used for humeral resection (mean 153 mm, 63–160 mm). Postoperatively, three patients developed transient palsy (one radial and two ulnar) which regressed. Four patients died from metastasis and had a satsifactory prosthesis result at time of death. The mean TESS was 73% (29–93%) at last follow-up

Discussion: Although this is a small series, the long-term results appear to indicate that reconstruction of the lower extremity of the humerus with a massive prosthesis is a satisfactory option for this rare tumour localisation.

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the risk factors, causes, bacteriology of deep infection following extensible endoprosthetic replacement for bone tumours in children and to review our experience in the treatment of 20 patients with infected prostheses.

Materials and methods: 123 patients with extensible endoprostheses were treated between 1983 and 1998. Three types of prostheses, which differed in the lengthening mechanism used, were implanted. 20 of these were diagnosed to have deep infection. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group I- 5 patients were treated with a single stage revision, group II- 13 patients were treated with a two stage revision procedure, group III- 2 patients had a primary amputation. Control of infection was assessed clinically and with inflammatory markers. Function was assessed using the MSTS score.

Results: The overall incidence of infection was 16%. The incidence of infection at the proximal tibia and distal femur was 27% and 14% respectively. Staphylococcus epidermi-dis was the most common organism. The most common clinical features were pain and swelling around the pros-theses. Infection in most cases was immediately preceded by an operative procedure or by distant a focus of infection. The number of operative procedures and the site of the prosthesis were significant risk factors. The success rate was 20% in Group I and 84.6% Group II. Amputation was the salvage procedure of choice for failed revision procedures. The mean MSTS functional score was 83% in patients in whom the infection was controlled.

Conclusion: The incidence of deep infection is high following extensible endoprostheses. The site of the pros-thesis and the number of operative procedures are significant risk factors.

Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) following Bone Tumour excision is common. A major complication of EPRs is infection, which can have disastrous consequences.

This paper investigates the cause of infection, management and sequelae.

Over 10, 000 patients have been treated in our unit over 34 years. Information collected prospectively on a database includes demographic data, diagnosis, treatment (including adjuvant), complications, and outcomes. Data was analysed to identify any infection in EPRs, its management and outcome. Factors such as operating time, blood loss, adjuvant therapy, type of prosthesis (extendable or standard) were investigated. Outcomes of treatment options were evaluated. Data was analysed on 1265 patients undergoing EPR over 34 years, giving a total follow up time of over 6500 patient years.

137 (10.8%) patients have been diagnosed with deep infection (defined by a positive culture [n=128] or a clinically infected prosthesis with pus in the EPR cavity [n=9]). Of these 49 (34%) required amputations for uncontrollable infection. The commonest organisms were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus and Group D Streptococci. The only satisfactory limb salvaging operation was 2 stage revision, which had 71% success in curing infection. Systemic antibiotics, antibiotic cement or beads and surgical debridement had little chance of curing infection. Infection rates were highest in the Tibial (23.1%) & Pelvic (22.9%) EPRs (p< 0.0001). Patients who had pre or post-operative radiotherapy had significantly higher rates of infection (p< 0.0001), as did patients with extendable EPRs (p=0.007).

Patients who had subsequently undergone patella resurfacing and rebushing also had a higher rate of infection (p=0.019 and p=0.052). Infection is a serious complication of EPRs. Treatment is difficult and prolonged. 2 stage revision is the only reliable method for limb salvage following deep infection. Prevention must be the key to reducing the incidence of this serious complication.