The Clinical assessment was based on modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society’s hallux-metatarsophalangeal scale. The subjective assessment was done by a questionnaire and radiological assessment was done by using digital radiographs.
Interventional MRI provides a novel non-invasive method of in-vivo weight-bearing analysis of the talo-calcaneal joint. Six healthy males (mean 28.8 years) underwent static right foot weight bearing MRI imaging at 0o, 15o inversion, and eversion. Using known radiological markers the motion of the talus and calcaneum were analysed. The calcaneum externally rotates, plantar-flexes and angulates into varus. The talus shows greater plantarflexion with similar varus angulation, with variable axial rotation. Relative talo-calcaneal motion thus involves, 6o relative talar internal rotation, 3.2o flexion and no motion in the frontal plane. Concurrently the talus moves laterally on the calcaneum, by 6.5mm, with variable translations in other planes. The calcaneum plantar-flexes, undergoes valgus angulation, and shows variable rotation in the axial plane. The talus plantar-flexes less, externally rotates, and shifts into varus. Relative motion in the axial and saggital plane reverses rotations seen during inversion. The 8o of relative valgus talo-calcaneal angulation is achieved through considerable varus angulation of the talus, in a direction opposite to the input motion. This phenomenon has not been previously reported. From coronal MRI data, comparative talo-calcaneal motion in inversion is prevented by high bony congruity, whereas during eversion, the taut posterior tibio-talar ligament appears to prevent talar valgus angulation. We have demonstrated that Interventional MRI scanning is a valuable tool in analysing the weight-bearing motion of the talo-calcaneal joint, whilst approaching the diagnostic accuracy of stereophotogammetry. We have also demonstrated consistent unexpected talar motion in the frontal plane. Talo-calcaneal motion is highly complex involving simultaneous rotation and translation, and hence calculations of instantaneous axes of rotation cannot effectively describe talo-calca-neal motion. We would suggest that relating individual and relative motion of the talus / calcaneum better describes subtalar kinematics.
Clinical investigations and tests need to be validated by studying their inter-observer and intra-observer errors, but there has been no documentation of such verification in diagnostic knee arthroscopy. We performed a prospective study to find out to what extent the findings in knee arthroscopy differ between two different surgeons. Two senior specialist registrars (M.S. and A.J.) who took part in this study worked with the senior author (ACW) for a period of eight and seven months respectively. A total of 78 knee arthroscopies admitted from routine waiting list were studied. The specialist registrar first performed arthroscopy when the supervising consultant stayed away from the operating room. His findings were recorded on a proforma by an independent third person before the consultant returned to the operating room and repeated the EUA and arthroscopy without prior knowledge of the trainee findings. Findings from the consultant arthroscopy were then recorded separately on the same proforma. The following findings were recorded:
Examination under anaesthesia Meniscal pathology ACL pathology Articular surface pathology (more than 1 Outer-bridge grade) The inter-observer variations in diagnostic knee arthroscopy were found to be high. Given the seniority and experience of the two trainee senior registrars involved in the study, and allowing for the Hawthorne effect, the results of the study cast doubt on this procedure being performed un-supervised. It also questions the validity of any therapeutic intervention based on the findings of un-supervised arthroscopies.
We carried out a prospective study in order to establish to what extent the intra-articular evaluation undertaken during arthroscopy of the knee differed between surgeons. Two senior specialist registrars and a consultant orthopaedic surgeon with a special interest in knee surgery were involved. A total of 78 knee arthroscopies (78 patients) was studied. Arthroscopy was first carried out by the trainee and then by the senior author (ACWH). The intra-articular evaluation during the arthroscopy was recorded independently by a third person in the operating theatre. Data were collected to record variations in examination under anaesthesia, the morphology and pathology of the menisci and anterior cruciate ligament and the state of the articular surfaces. The overall interobserver variation was 20% in all categories. We question the published results of intra-articular evaluation during knee arthroscopy when surgeons of different levels of experience are involved in a single study.