A lumbar laminectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure for the decompression of neural structures. The aim of this human cadaveric study is to establish the extent of pars interarticularis remaining at each lumbar level when a laminectomy is performed to the medial edge of the pedicle.

Seven human cadavers with intact lumbar spines were obtained for this study. The lumbar spine was dissected from the body and segmental disarticulation of each level was performed. The isolated lumbar levels had laminectomies performed exposing the neural canal. The vertical alignment of the laminectomy was orientated in line with the medial aspect of the ipsilateral pedicle. The remaining lateral pars interarticularis was measured with a calliper. The procedure was performed bilaterally at each isolated lumbar segment.

Five males and two female cadavers with an age range of sixty-eight years to ninety-five years at the time of death. Fourteen lumbar segments of each respective level were available for study except at L5, where only twelve was possible due the presence of a transitional vertebra in one of the specimens. Taken to the nearest mms, the average width of the remnant pars interarticularis at the L1 level was 4 mm, range 3–6 mm (SD 0.95); L2 6 mm, range 5–7 mm (SD 0.77); L3 8mm, range 4–9mm (SD 1.34); L4 11mm, range 9–14 mm (SD 1.31) and L5 16mm, range 13–17 mm (SD 1.15). One way analysis of variance for each of the groups were performed to establish that the difference recorded was greater than that expected by chance (p< 0.05). The results predictably established the gradual narrowing of the pars interarticularis as the levels ascend cranially from L5.

The medial wall of the pedicle could be used as an indirect means to establish a satisfactory remnant of the pars interarticularis following a laminectomy in the lower lumbar spine, at the levels of L3 to L5. However in the upper two levels direct visualisation of the pars is recommended.

Introduction: Patient selection has been critical to the excellent medium-term clinical results following hip resurfacing. Hypersensivity to metal ion debris has been described in previous generations of metal-on-metal bearings. This may also be a problem that affects modern designs. Characteristic histological changes have been identified (ALVAL). There are few studies that include large female numbers, and show separate outcome and implant survival.

Methods: Eighty-one female hips at a mean of 23 months (11–43) had an ASR hip resurfacing procedure at a single-surgeon independent centre. Mean age was 55 years (28–69). Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were recorded at one-year follow-up. Failures were analysed.

Results: HHS improved from 46.4 (11–77) to 90.2 (27–100). Overall, there was a 7.4 % revision rate. There were 3 femoral neck fractures. In the entire series of 98 female patients there were 3 cases of severe pain requiring revision (3.1%). All three patients had HHS < 50 at one year follow-up. Patients had groin pain, reduced flexion and a painful straight leg raise. Blood results were not suggestive of infection. Aspiration of the hip joint in each case revealed copious amounts of milky green grey aseptic fluid. All had similar macroscopic changes at revision. There were characteristic histological changes in keeping with ALVAL. All 3 patients were revised to THRs with ceramic bearings.

Discussion: The failure rate of 7.4% in the older female group is poor at this early stage following hip resurfacing. The incidence of metal hypersensitivity in our series suggests this complication may be more common than previously thought. Patients with persisting pain of unknown aetiology following resurfacing at other centres may have metal hypersensitivity.