Wear and corrosion between head and stem tapers of modular hip implants have recently been related to clinical failures, possibly due to high friction moments in poorly lubricated joints [1–2]. In-vivo measurements have revealed reversing joint friction moments in the hip during a gait cycle [3], which may foster relative motion between the modular components. Blood, soft tissue or bone debris at the taper interface during assembly can lead to decreased stability or increased stress concentrations due to non-uniform loading [4]. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of taper contamination and the assembly force on the seating characteristic of the head on the stem incorporating realistic reversing joint friction moments. Cobalt chrome heads (M-SPEC, 36mm, +1.5mm; n=5) were assembled on titanium femoral stems (Corail 12/14, both components Depuy Synthes; n=5) by quasistatic axial push-on forces (F=0.5kN, 1kN, 2kN). Heads were modified by milling a flat plane, to which the joint load was applied alternately to point A and point B for 20 cycles to provide reversing moments (heel-strike FA=1971N, MA=5.4Nm; toe-off FB=807N, MB=4.6Nm; Fig. 1). All 6 degrees of freedom of relative displacement between head and stem were determined in the unloaded state and after each loading cycle. A coordinate measurement machine (accuracy ±2µm) was used to determine the components positions. Pull-off forces were measured after the last loading cycle. Each taper was tested in pristine condition and then contaminated with a bone chip (1.7±0.2mg).Introduction
Methods
Dual modular hip prostheses were introduced to optimize the individual and intra-surgical adaptation of the implant design to the native anatomics und biomechanics of the hip. The downside of a modular implant design with an additional modular interface is the potential susceptibility to fretting, crevice corrosion and wear [1–2]. The purpose of this study was to characterize the metal ion release of a modular hip implant system with different modular junctions and material combinations in consideration of the corrosive physiological environment. One design of a dual modular hip prosthesis (Ti6Al4V, Metha®, Aesculap AG, Germany) with a high offset neck adapter (CoCrMo, CCD-angle of 130°, neutral antetorsion) and a monobloc prosthesis (stem size 4) of the same implant type were used to characterize the metal ion release of modular and non-modular hip implants. Stems were embedded in PMMA with 10° adduction and 9° flexion according to ISO 7206-6 and assembled with ceramic (Biolox® delta) or CoCrMo femoral heads (XL-offset) by three light impacts with a hammer. All implant options were tested in four different test fluids: Ringer's solution, bovine calf serum and iron chloride solution (FeCl3-concentration: 10 g/L and 114 g/L). Cyclic axial sinusoidal compressive load (Fmax = 3800 N, peak load level of walking based on in vivo force measurements [3]) was applied for 10 million cycles using a servohydraulic testing machine (MTS MiniBionix 370). The test frequency was continuously varied between 15 Hz (9900 cycles) followed by 1 Hz (100 cycles). The metal ion concentration (cobalt, chromium and titanium) of the test fluids were analysed using ICP-OES and ICP-MS at intervals of 0, 5·105, 2·106 and 10·106 cycles (measuring sensitivity < 1 µg/L).Introduction
Methods
For a safe design of ceramic components in total hip arthroplasty it is important to know the stress state within each part of the system under in vivo loading scenarios. Besides several design parameters, e.g. diametrical clearance between ball head and liner or angular mismatch in the taper region of metal shell and liner, also physiological factors, like patients' weight or bone quality, influence the stresses within the components. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to experimentally determine the stresses in a ceramic liner varying two of the factors: clearance and inclination angle of the liner. Two ceramic liners were instrumented at the outer contour with five strain gauge (SG) rosettes (measuring grid length: 1.5 mm) on each liner (Fig.1). Metal shells were seated in an asymmetric press-fit Sawbones® model using a 0.5 mm under-reaming, and liners were afterwards axially assembled with a 2 kN load. SG5 was placed at the flat area of the liner, the other four were placed circumferentially in 90 degrees offset on the rear side of the liner. SG2 and SG4 were mounted opposite to each other in press-fit direction (contact of metal shell to the Sawbones® block) whereas SG1 and SG3 were placed in the non-supported direction (no contact of metal shell to the Sawbones® block). Four different inclination angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°) were tested under in vivo relevant loads of 4.5 and 11 kN. Two ceramic ball heads were used to examine a mid tolerance clearance and a clearance at the lower tolerance limit. Strain data was converted to stresses and compared using a paired two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test at an α-level of 0.05.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The early failure and revision of bimodular primary
total hip arthroplasty prostheses requires the identification of the
risk factors for material loss and wear at the taper junctions through
taper wear analysis. Deviations in taper geometries between revised
and pristine modular neck tapers were determined using high resolution
tactile measurements. A new algorithm was developed and validated
to allow the quantitative analysis of material loss, complementing
the standard visual inspection currently used. The algorithm was applied to a sample of 27 retrievals ( Cite this article:
Micromotions between stem and neck adapter depend on prosthesis design and material coupling. Based on the results of this study, the amount of micromotion seems to reflect the risk of fretting-induced fatigue in vivo. Bimodular hip prostheses were developed to allow surgeons an individual reconstruction of the hip joint by varying length, offset and anteversion in the operation theatre. Despite these advantages, the use of these systems led to a high rate of postoperative complications resulting in revision rates of up to 11% ten years after surgical intervention. During daily activities taper connections of modular hip implants are highly stressed regions and contain the potential of micromotions between adjacent components, fretting and corrosion. This might explain why an elevated number of fretting-induced neck fractures occurred in clinics. However, some bi-modular prostheses (e.g. Metha, Aesculap, Ti-Ti) are more often affected by those complications than others (e.g. H-Max M, Limacorporate, Ti-Ti or Metha, Ti-CoCr) implying that the design and the material coupling have an impact on this failure pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify whether clinical successful prostheses offer lower micromotions than those with an elevated number of in vivo fractures.Summary
Introduction
Nucleotomy almost doubles the transmitted forces on the facet joints in human lumbar spine, regardless of the amount of removed nucleus pulposus. Low back pain involves the lumbar facet joints in 15% to 45% of the cases. The surgical intervention, nucleotomy, might also lead to painful facets with a high risk; however, its mechanism is yet to be fully understood. The aim of this study is to reveal how a small amount of nucleus removal can change the force transmission on the facets.Summary
Introduction
From a mechanical point of view, the clinical use of pedicle screws in the atlas is a promising alternative to lateral mass screws due to an increased biomechanical fixation. The most established surgical technique for posterior screw fixation in the atlas (C1) is realised by screw placement through the lateral mass [1]. This surgical placement may lead to extended bleeding from the paravertebral venous plexus as well as a violation of the axis (C2) nerve roots [1]. Using pedicle screws is an emerging technique which utilises the canal passing through the posterior arch enabling the use of longer screws with a greater contact area while avoiding the venous plexus and axis nerve roots. The aim of this Summary Statement
Introduction
At the clinical CT image resolution level, there is no influence of the image voxel size on the derived finite element human cancellous bone models Computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) models have been proved to provide a better prediction of vertebral strength than dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [1]. FE models based on µCTs are able to provide the golden standard results [2], but due to the sample size restriction of the µCT and the XtremeCT machines, the clinical CT-based FE models is still the most promising tool for the in vivo prediction of vertebrae's strength. It has been found [3] that FE predicted Young's modulus of human cancellous bone increases as the image voxel size increases at the µCT resolution level [3]. However, it is still not clear whether the image voxel size in the clinical range has an impact on the predicted mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. This study is designed to answer this question.Summary
Introduction
Head sizes used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased drastically from the original 22mm used by Charnley. This is due to two factors: the use of hard-on-hard materials for the bearing articulation and the increasing problem of dislocation. Hard-on-hard materials enable mixed or fluid film lubrication due to their good wettability. The development of a fluid film layer is encouraged by smaller surface pressures (larger area) and higher velocity at the articulating interface (larger radius), suggesting that larger diameters exhibit better lubrication and such less wear. This was effectivly proven in pre-clinical simulator studies and used as argument to increase the diameters of metal-on-metall and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clinically the tribological advantage of larger diameters has not yet been shown. For hard-on-soft bearings the situation is different. Due to the bad wettability of Polyethylene (PE), the abrasive wear regime is dominant. This means that the longer wear path of a larger diameter will inevitably carry a larger amount of wear debris. Despite this relation, the heads used in combination with PE were also increased up to 40mm diameter, justified by the overall greatly reduced wear amount of the new generation(s) of cross-linked PE and favourable simulator results. First in-vivo studies have shown that larger heads carry larger amounts of wear particles. Whether this increase is relevant with respect to osteolysis is still unclear and will have to be shown in longer term studies. Larger heads require a larger “jumping” distance until they dislocate. Consequently the use of larger heads reduces dislocation rates, which was shown in multiple clinical studies. However, the reduction in dislocation rate achieved by increasing diameters varies greatly. Some centres achieve dislocation rates below 1% with 28mm heads, other centres require 36mm heads to achieve the same result. No study shows any further advantage with head diameters larger than 36mm. Despite their obvious biomechanical advantage with regard to stability, larger heads also have large disadvantages. Larger heads carry inevitably larger friction moments, requiring better anchoring of the components. In unfavourable conditions (start-up, break-down of lubrication film), friction moments of hard-on-hard bearings can get very high and reach or even exceed the losening torque of the head on the taper. Depending on the head impaction foce during assembly, the loosening torques amount to 8 to 17Nm. Movement at the head-taper connection possibly causes wear and increased corrosion at this interface. Larger head diameters also require thinner shells and/or liners, leading to problems with liner chipping or incomplete seating. Large head diameters have also lead to the use of sub-hemispherical cups with reduced covering surface, increasing the risk of fluid film break down due to edge loading if not well positioned. Finally, larger heads might give the surgeon a wrong feeling of security regarding a sub-optimal positioned cup. The question regarding “the optimal” head diameter is open for discussion and needs to consider the bearing material used. Head size should be limited to a reasonable compromise, which based on the information currently available, could be 36mm. Join the “36 and under” club.The tribological aspect
The biomechanical aspect
Despite proven advantages, pulsatile lavage seems to be used infrequently during preparation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. This remains irritating, as the technique has been suggested to improve radiological survival in cemented TKA, where aseptic loosening of the tibial component represents the main reason for revision. Furthermore, there may be a potential improvement of fixation strength for the tibial tray achieved by increased cement penetration. In this study, the influence of pulsed lavage on mechanical stability of the tibial component and bone cement penetration was analyzed in a cadaveric setting. Six pairs of cadaveric, proximal tibia specimen underwent computed tomography (CT) for assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and exclusion of osseous lesions. Following surgical preparation, in one side of a pair, the tibial surface was irrigated using 1800ml normal saline and pulsatile lavage, while in the other side syringe lavage using the identical amount of fluid was applied. After careful drying, bone cement was hand-pressurized on the bone surface, tibial components were inserted and impacted in an identical way. After curing of cement, specimen underwent a postimplantation CT analysis). Cement distrubution was then assessed using a three-dimenionsional visualization software. Trabecular bone, cement and implant were segmented based on an automatic thresholding algorithm, which had been validated in a previous study. This allowed to determine median cement penetration for the entire cemented area. Furthermore, fixation strength of the tibial trays was determined by a vertical pull-out test using a servohydraulic material testing machine. Testing was performed under displacement control at a rate of 0,5mm/sec until implant failure. Data was described by median and range. Results were compared by a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with a type 1 error probability of 5 %. Median pull-out forces in the pulsed lavage group were 1275N (range 864–1391) and 568N (range 243–683) in the syringe lavage group (p=0.031). Cement penetration was likewise increased (p=0.031) in the pulsed lavage group (1.32mm; range 0.86–1.94), when compared to the syringe irrigated group (0.79mm; range 0.51–1.66). Failure occurred in the pulsatile lavage group at the implant-cement interface and in the syringe lavage group at the bone-cement interface, which indicates the weakness of the latter. Altogether, improved mechanical stability of the tibial implant and likewise increased bone cement interdigitation could be demonstrated in the current study, when pulsed lavage is implemented. Enhanced fixation strength was suggested being a key to improved survival of the implant. If this is the case, pulsatile lavage should be considered being a mandatory preparation step when cementing tibial components in TKA.
Statistical analyses were performed using statistical software. Probability of Type I error was set to 5% (alpha=0.05).
Osteonecrosis was found in 81 (97.6%) hips revised after fracture (p<
.0001). The vertical size of avascular necrosis in hips after acute postnecrotic fracture (21.1mm±8.5) was bigger (p<
.0001) than in both chronic (7.3mm±7.3) and acute mechanic (0.9 mm±1.2) fractures. Even though 33 (66.0%) of 50 patients with acute postnecrotic fracture were men (p=.0237), no significant differences between males and females were found with respect to age of patients (p=.3445) or duration of prosthesis implantation (p=.1232).
The proposed classification may help to understand causes of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ludloff’s medial approach has never been used for other hip surgeries especially not for THR. 47 patients (26 men/21 women) provided informed consent to participate in the study. The inclusion criterion for the study was the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the hip joint. The average age at operation was 53.7±10.4years. All patients were provided with a CUT® prosthesis. All patients were examined clinically and X-rayed preoperatively as well as postoperatively at three days, two weeks, six weeks and six months. The functional hip scores according to Harris and the Oxford hip score were obtained preoperatively and at the defined intervals postoperatively. The surgical duration and the intraop-erative as well as the postoperative blood loss were measured for each patient. Abductor muscle function and the number of steps a patient was able to walk without walking aids on a treadmill at a velocity of 5km/h (a maximum of 100steps was measured) were assessed. Multifactorial analyses of variance and Chi-square tests were performed. Based on the numbers available there were no significant differences between the two groups in the distribution of patient age (p=0.604), gender (p=0.654), weight (p=0.180) and height (p=0.295). No significant differences in the calculated Harris score (p=0.723) were found pre-operatively. The amount of steps the patient was able to walk was not different between the approach groups (p=0.636). The total amount of blood loss (intra- + post-OP) was even significantly lower in the medial approach group (p=0.009). Three days post-operatively the leg lengths were assessed. The difference was not statistically significant based on the numbers available (p=0.926). The overall correlation between Harris and Oxford score was significant (r2=0.63, p<
0.001). Three days post-operatively a slight, but significant better Harris (p<
0.001) and Oxford scores (p=0.001) could be observed in the medial approach group. The number of steps the patient was able to walk without help or crutches was significantly higher in the medial approach group (p=0.001). The Trendelenburg sign (p<
0.001) and the limping criterion (p<
0.001) were significantly less in the medial approach group. Two weeks post-operatively the Harris (p=0.001) and the Oxford (p=0.046) scores were significantly better for the medial approach group. The number of steps the patient was able to walk without help or crutches was significantly higher in the medial approach group (p<
0,001). The medial approach is clinically feasible to perform the implantation of a femoral neck prosthesis. The accuracy of the stem implantation reflected in both the leg lengths and the postoperative X-ray alignment was not different between the groups. After six months there was no significant difference between the conventional anterolateral approach and the medial approach in the presented study.
The idea of resurfacing the femoral head instead of removing it has been attractive for a long time. Unfortunately the results have been invariably poor if compared with contemporary available conventional hip prosthesis. In the last decade metal on metal technology with very accurate manufacturing made hip resurfacing a viable option. The main complication of this operation is early failure due to femoral neck fracture. This event is still incompletely understood and probably multi-factorial. Accurate placement of the femoral component to avoid notching the femoral neck, cementing technique to avoid over-penetration of the cement, small implantation forces and careful soft tissue handling to minimize the damage to the bone vascularity are thought to be the main issues. The ideal candidates for this operation are young and active patients because they have good bone quality and will take advantage of the improved performances that hip resurfacing can offer. Unfortunately young men are also the group of patients at higher risk for the formation of heterotopic ossifications.). To prevent this complication radiotherapy was administered in a single dose of 6 Gy with two opposite fields of 18 MV generally the first post operative day. When we started to perform hip resurfacing we did not consider changing our protocol. Between March 2004 and May 2005, 55 hip resurfacings were performed using the ASR implant (DePuy) by a single surgeon (LM). Most males under the age of 60 received radiotherapy. There were 4 femoral neck fractures in the 23 male patients who received radiotherapy (17.3 %) and 1 fracture in the 32 patients who did not receive radiotherapy (3.1 %, Chi-square test: p= 0.07). All the fractures occurred between the 90th and the 120th postoperative day. No fractures were reported in the 12 women included in this study. What arouse our attention was the unacceptably high number of femoral neck fractures. The learning curve alone could not explain what was happening. At first the radiotherapy was not considered at all as factor but errors in the surgical technique were looked for. The clue came from the observation that there were no women in the fracture group in spite of the fact that the surgical technique was the same and also in spite of the fact that women should be at higher risk due to poorer bone quality as shown in the literature. This led us to check the incidence of fractures in the radiotherapy and in the non radiotherapy group. At this stage things became quite clear. Subsequently the histology of the specimen was re-examined with regard to this factor. Bone necrosis of the femoral head in the patients who underwent radiotherapy was much more pronounced then in other failures which show different degrees of necrosis. In conclusion there are strong indications that radiotherapy of the femoral head should not be performed in combination with hip resurfacing.
We compared the orientation of the acetabular component obtained by a conventional manual technique with that using five different navigation systems. Three surgeons carried out five implantations of an acetabular component with each navigation system, as well as manually, using an anatomical model. The orientation of the acetabular component, including inclination and anteversion, and its position was determined using a co-ordinate measuring machine. The variation of the orientation of the acetabular component was higher in the conventional group compared with the navigated group. One experienced surgeon took significantly less time for the procedure. However, his placement of the component was no better than that of the less experienced surgeons. Significantly better inclination and anteversion (p <
0.001 for both) were obtained using navigation. These parameters were not significantly different between the surgeons when using the conventional technique (p = 0.966). The use of computer navigation helps a surgeon to orientate the acetabular component with less variation regarding inclination and anteversion.
Ceramic-on-ceramic was shown to have advantageous tribologic properties (low wear and friction). For medical applications two ceramics, alumina and zircona, are available. This case study shows that the combination of different ceramics for hard-hard pairings can be critical. A 57 year old patient received a total hip prosthesis (cementless stem with a ceramic head and a monolithic ceramic cup). Thirty-five months postoperatively the patient complained about squeaking noises during walking and stair climbing. Clinical diagnoses showed a good range of motion and no signs of loosening. Conventional rehabilitation did not improve the situation and 43 months after primary surgery the cup and the head had to be revised on the patients request. Intraoperatively no loosening indications were found. The explanted components were analysed using a 3D co-ordinate measuring machine. The head and the cup were made of different ceramics. The zirconia (ZrO2) head occurred rather white whereas the alumina (Al2O3) cup was yellow-reddish. The inner articulating surface of the cup showed no decoloration or wear. The surface of the head contained mated areas with surface defects in equatorial regions (maximum wear depth 9μm). The head and the cup were combined from different manufacturers. The distinct surface changes and wear marks of the zirconia head probably caused the squeaking noise after 3 years in situ. Zirconia for medical applications is generally Y-TZP ceramic. Pressure, heating, and water can cause severe surface embrittlement. Pre-damaging due to the manufacturing process or friction in the joint might be the mechanism leading to pre-mature wear and failure. Joint components from different manufacturers should only be implanted with proper official authorisation.
