Historically, knee implants have been designed using average patient anatomy and despite excellent implant survivorship, patient satisfaction is not consistently achieved. One possibility for this dissatisfaction relates to the individual patient anatomic variability. To reduce this inter-patient variability, recent advances in imaging and manufacturing have allowed for the implementation of patient specific posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These implants are individually made based on a patient's femoral and tibial anatomy determined from a pre-operative CT scan. Although in-vitro studies have demonstrated promising results, there are few studies evaluating these implants in vivo. The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo kinematics for subjects having a customized, individually made(CIM) knee implant or one of several traditional, off-the-shelf (OTS) TKA designs. In vivo kinematics were assessed for 108 subjects, 44 having a CIM-PCR-TKA and 64 having one of three standard designs, OTS-PCR-TKA which included symmetric TKA(I), single radius TKA(II) and asymmetric TKA(III) designs. A mobile fluoroscopic system was used to observe subjects during a weight-bearing deep knee bend (DKB), a Chair Rise and Normal Gait. All the subjects were implanted by one of two surgeons and were clinically successful (HSS Score>90). The kinematic comparison between the three designs involved range of motion, femoral translation, axial rotation, and condylar lift-off.Introduction
Methods
The Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) incorporates two cam-post mechanisms in order to replicate the functionality and stability provided by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the native knee. Recently (2012), a second generation BCS design has introduced femur and tibial bearing modifications that are intended to delay lateral femoral condyle rollback and encourage more stable positioning of the medial femoral condyle to more closely replicate normal knee kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of this TKA to the normal knee during a weight bearing flexion activity. In vivo kinematics were derived for 10 normal non-implanted knees and 40 second generation BCS TKAs all implanted by a single surgeon. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained for each normal patient, and 3D reconstruction of the femur, tibia/fibula, and patella was performed. Fluoroscopic images were captured at 60 Hz using a mobile fluoroscopic unit that tracked the knee while patients performed a deep knee bend (DKB) from full extension to maximum flexion. A 3D-to-2D image registration technique was used at 30° increments to determine the transformations of the segmented bones or TKA components. The anterior-posterior motion of the lateral femoral condyle contact point (LAP) and the medial femoral condyle contact point (MAP), as well as tibio-femoral axial rotation, were measured at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted at the 95% confidence level.Background
Methods
Currently, hip implant designs are evaluated experimentally using mechanical simulators or cadavers, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) postoperative outcomes are evaluated clinically using long-term follow-up. However, these evaluation techniques can be both costly and time-consuming. Fortunately, forward solution mathematical models can function as theoretical joint simulators, providing instant feedback to designers and surgeons alike. Recently, a validated forward solution model of the hip has been developed that can theoretically simulate new implant designs and surgical technique modifications under in vivo conditions. The objective of this study was to expand the use of this hip model to function as an intraoperative virtual implant tool, thereby allowing surgeons to predict, compare, and optimize postoperative THA outcomes based on component placement, sizing choices, reaming and cutting locations, and surgical methods.Background
Objective
The Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) incorporates two cam-post mechanisms to reproduce the functionality and stability provided by the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament in the native knee. The anterior cam-post mechanism provides stability in full extension and early flexion (≤20°) while the posterior cam-post mechanism prevents anterior sliding of the femur during deeper flexion (≥60°). Recently (2012), a second generation BCS design introduced more normal shapes to the femur and tibial bearing geometries that provides delayed lateral femoral condyle rollback and encourages more stable positioning of the medial femoral condyle. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vivo kinematics exhibited by the two generations during weight bearing flexion. In vivo kinematics were derived for 126 patients. Eighty-six subjects were implanted with a first generation BCS (BCS 1) TKA and 40 with the second generation BCS (BCS 2) TKA. Fluoroscopic videos were captured for patients while they performed a deep knee bend (DKB) from full extension to maximum flexion. Anterior-posterior motion of the lateral femoral condyle (LAP) and the medial femoral condyle (MAP), as well as tibio-femoral axial rotation, were analyzed at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion using a 3D-to-2D image registration technique. Statistical analysis was conducted at the 95% confidence level.Introduction
Methods
While not common in the native hip, occurrences of femoral head separation from the acetabular cup during gait are well documented after total hip arthroplasty. Although the effects of this phenomenon are not well understood, we hypothesize that these atypical kinematics are due to component misalignments that yield uncharacteristic forces on the hip joint that are not present in the native hip. The objective of this study was to theoretically predict the causes of hip separation during stance phase using forward solution mathematical modelling.Background
Objective
Currently, knee and hip implants are evaluated experimentally using mechanical simulators or clinically using long-term follow-up. Unfortunately, it is not practical to mechanically evaluate all patient and surgical variables and predict the viability of implant success and/or performance. More recently, a validated mathematical model has been developed that can theoretically simulate new implant designs under in vivo conditions to predict joint forces kinematics and performance. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use a validated forward solution model (FSM) to evaluate new and existing implant designs, predicting mechanics of the hip and knee joints. The model simulates the four quadriceps muscles, the complete hamstring muscle group, all three gluteus muscles, iliopsoas group, tensor fasciae latae, and an adductor muscle group. Other soft tissues include the patellar ligament, MCL, LCL, PCL, ACL, multiple ligaments connecting the patella to the femur, and the primary hip capsular ligaments (ischiofemoral, iliofemoral, and pubofemoral). The model was previously validated using telemetric implants and fluoroscopic results and is now being used to analyze multiple implant geometries. Virtual implantation allows for various surgical alignments to determine the effect of surgical errors. Furthermore, the model can simulate resecting, weakening, or tightening of soft tissues based on surgical errors or technique modifications.Introduction
Methods
