Introduction: With a minimally invasive approach for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKA), it is difficult to determine the femoral component size intra-operatively. It can be difficult to template pre-operative radiographs due to superimposition of the two femoral condyles, and non-standardised x-ray magnification.

Aim: The purpose of the study was to find an easy, reliable, alternative method for this assessment such as height and gender.

Material and methods: One hundred x-rays of patients (44 men, 56 women), who had undergone Oxford UKR, were reviewed. Preoperative radiographs were templated, and postoperative x-rays were reviewed to determine the ideal component size. Patient’s height was recorded. The proportion of patients for whom an appropriate size could be selected by either template or height measurements was calculated.

Results: Current templating system accurately predicted the ideal size in 67 patients. The following size bands were set according to height. For men: size small in patients less than160 cm, medium less than 170 cm and large less than 180 cm. For women: size small in patients less than 164 cm, medium less than 174 cm and large less than 184 cm. Height accurately predicted the ideal size in 75 patients. In no case was the assessment of component size incorrect by more than one size.

Conclusion: Gender specific height safely predicted the ideal component size in 75 percent of patients undergoing UKA. Component size can be determined satisfactorily from patient height and gender and can be used as adjunct to existing templating method.

Introduction and Aims: Since existing data relating to the kinematics of ACL-deficient knee joints relates mainly to walking, the kinematics during more dynamic activities remains unknown; therefore, the aim of this unique study was to describe in vivo ACL-deficient knee kinematics and muscle activity during running and cutting.

Method: Fifteen subjects with proven unilateral ACL rupture were measured performing running and cutting tasks prior to surgical reconstruction. Gait analysis was used to determine inter-limb differences in displacements at the knee joint during stance phase. Simultaneous EMG analysis was performed to give temporal measures of lower limb muscle activity.

Results: No significant inter-limb difference was seen for tibio-femoral translation in the sagittal or coronal planes during any part of stance phase. The ACLD limb showed a significantly reduced maximum knee flexion angle (40.4 vs. 44.0 degrees) compared to the ACL-intact (ACLI) limb (p=0.04). Internal tibial rotation was significantly greater (7.3 vs. 0.7 degrees) in the ACLD limb at toe-off (p=0.03). The quadriceps muscle group was found to be active for a significantly greater percentage of stance phase in the ACLD limb compared to the ACLI limb (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The ACL-deficient gait involves consistently greater knee extensor activity than ACL-intact gait during running, and as a consequence maximum knee flexion angle is reduced. These findings contrast with the description of ‘quadriceps-avoidance’ gait often described for ACL-deficient subjects. ACL-deficient gait also demonstrates increased rotational instability during terminal stance phase.

Introduction and Aims: The effects of injury to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterior-lateral corner (PLC) on physical function are not as well documented compared to the more common injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. This study aimed at improving our understanding of PCL/PLC injury through gait analysis and electromyographic (EMG) testing.

Method: We studied 19 patients, average age 30 years (20–55) with clinically and radiologically confirmed PCL/PLC deficiency in isolation. Ninety percent of patients complained of instability when performing the activities of daily living and all complained of pain. All patients were assessed using the Lysholm and Gillquist functional knee score as well as gait analysis, including Kinematics, Kinetics and EMG of the quadriceps, hamstrings and gastrocnemius muscles. Findings were compared to our normal database. The mean Lysholm score was 51/100 (24–90). Those with a Lysholm greater than 50 were designated as ‘copers’.

Results: There were 12 ‘non-copers’ and seven ‘copers’. Fifty percent of patients demonstrated a varus thrust through stance. Forty-two percent of patients demonstrated hyperextension of the knee through stance. Sixty-three percent of patients demonstrated premature and prolonged hamstring activity. Thirty-seven percent of patients had premature activity of the gastrocnemius muscle in stance. Fifty-seven percent of the ‘copers’ demonstrated premature and prolonged hamstring activity through the gait cycle compared to forty-five percent of ‘non-copers’ (non-significant p=0.25 Fishers Exact Test). Fifty-five of ‘non-copers’ demonstrated premature activity of the gastrocnemius muscle in stance compared to none of the ‘copers’ (significant p=0.025 Fishers Exact Test).

Conclusion: The observed varus thrust may be responsible for the development of medial and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis, a recognised problem in PCL deficient knees. Hyperextension that occurs dynamically during gait could explain failure of PCL/PLC reconstruction over time. The observed abnormal hamstrings activity is unlikely to be a compensatory mechanism.

Introduction and Aims: Single compartmental replacement procedures are increasingly preferred over total knee replacement (TKR) for single compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Theoretically, reduced disruption of the native joint should produce more normal kinematics. This study aimed to describe and compare the sagittal plane kinematics of four different, commonly used devices.

Method: Four groups of patients who had undergone successful single compartment replacement at least two years previously were recruited. Fifteen following Oxford medial UKA, 12 following medial St Georg Sled UKA, five following Oxford lateral UKA, and 12 following Avon PFJ replacement. Patients performed flexion/extension against gravity, and a step-up during video fluoroscopy. The Patellar Tendon Angle (PTA), the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the patella tendon, was obtained as a function of knee flexion. This relationship provides indication of sagittal movement between femur and tibia through range and has been validated as a reliable measure of joint kinematics.

Results: The kinematic profile for each group was compared to that of the profile for 12 normal and 30 TKR (AGC) knees. All three tibiofemoral devices produced knee kinematics similar to the normal knee. The PTA was found to have a linear relationship to flexion angle, decreasing with increasing knee flexion angle. No such linear relationship exists for the TKR joint, which display abnormal kinematics. The PF device also reflected similar trends to that for normal knees except that the PTA was moderately increased throughout the entire range of flexion (three degrees).

Conclusion: In contrast to TKR, all single compartmental knee replacements provided kinematics similar to the normal joint. The kinematic pattern of the PFJ replacement may be of most interest as the observed increase in PTA through range could influence patello-femoral contact forces

Introduction and Aims Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is appropriate for one in three osteoarthritic knees requiring replacement. An accelerated protocol enables patients undergoing UKA to be discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Before such an approach is universally accepted it must be safe, effective and economically viable. A study was performed to compare the new accelerated protocol with current standard care in a state healthcare system.

Method A single blind RCT design was used. Patients eligible for UKA were screened for NSAID tolerance, social circumstances and geographical location before allocation to either an accelerated recovery group (Group A) or a standard non accelerated group (Group S). The accelerated protocol included dedicated pain management and discharge support. Primary outcome was the Oxford Knee Assessment at 6 months post operation, compared using independent t tests. Pain, range of movement and incidence of complications were also recorded by assessors blind to group allocation. Cost effectiveness was calculated in quality life adjusted years (QLAY) using the Euroqual instrument. The study power was sufficient to avoid type 2 errors. The study was supported by a NHS Regional R& D grant.

Results Forty one patients (21 group A, 20 group S) were included. Groups had comparable age and patient profiles. Average discharge time was 37 hours (1.5 days) for group A and 114 hours (4.3 days) for group S. Pain on hospital discharge was similar for both groups. No significant difference was found between groups for pain or range of movement at any time, although patients in group S regained pre-operative flexion faster than group A. One major complication occurred in each group; one infection (group S) and one manipulation for poor movement (group A). The cost per QLAY for the new protocol was 59% of the standard care.

Conclusion The new protocol allows for safe accelerated discharge from hospital after UKA. The approach is cost effective and should help to increase the throughput of patients who require knee replacement.

Purpose of the study Function is strongly infl uenced by proprioceptive ability, this prospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the change in proprioceptive performance after knee replacement; comparing total to unicompartment replacement.

Methods and Results Two groups of patients with OA as diagnosed clinically and by X-ray were recruited. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (mean age 65.8yrs range 57-72yrs, 10 females & 5 males) listed for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with the AGC (Biomet, UK). Group 2 consisted of 19 patients (mean age 65.5yrs range 52–75yrs; 9 females & 10 males) listed for Oxford Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty (OUKA) for medial compartment OA. The ACL and PCL were present and preserved in all patients in Group 2, while only the PCL was preserved for Group 1 patients.

Joint Position Sense (JPS) & sway were used as measures of proprioception performance. Both groups were assessed pre- and 6 months post-op. JPS was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (KinCom, Chatanooga Ltd) as the error in actively and passively reproducing fi ve randomly ordered knee fl exion angles (30°, 40°, 50°, 60° and 70°). Sway (area, path and velocity) was measured during single leg stance using a Balance Performance Monitor (SMS Medical) for 30-second interval. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

Pre-operatively, no differences in JPS or sway were found between limbs in either group. No differences existed between the two groups.

Post-operatively, both groups had signifi cant improvement of JPS in the operated limb only (Mean ± standard deviation for UKA 4.64±1.44° and for TKA 5.18±1.35°). No changes in JPS were seen in the control side. Group 2 patients showed signifi cant improvement in both sway area and path (p< .0001) for both limbs post-operatively. No signifi cant post-operative changes in sway occurred in either limb of Group 1 patients.

The OKS improved post-operatively in both groups, rising from 21.4 to 35.5 for Group 1 patients and from 23.9 to 38 for Group 2 patients.

Conclusion Interestingly, joint position sense improved for both groups but did not seem to show any difference between UKA and TKA. Postural sway was infl uenced by joint replacement type. Ligament retention may contribute to improved global postural control seen after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and may explain the higher level of function seen in these patients.

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an increasingly popular procedure for young osteoarthritic patients whose age and activity levels preclude the use of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, successful reconstruction using an unconstrained mobile bearing implant requires an intact and functioning ACL. Patients with isolated medial compartment OA and an absent ACL therefore provide a management dilemma for the treating surgeon. One option is to perform a combined ACL reconstruction and mobile bearing UKA. This paper presents early results of this new procedure using an Oxford UKA and ACL reconstruction using an autograft.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients who underwent one or two-staged ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA for treatment of symptomatic medial compartment OA were reviewed at one year after surgery. The combined procedure required specific precautions and considerations; care had to be taken to place the tibial tunnel as far laterally as possible to avoid impingement of the graft by the tibial implant. Also, the presence of a posteromedial, rather than an anteromedial cartilage defect has the potential to reduce accuracy for placement of the initial tibial cut.

Results: All patients were male with an average age of 49 years (range: 36 – 52) and mean follow up of 1.3 years. One patient needed revision to TKA due to infection. The objective and functional knee society scores improved pre to post operatively from 55 to 98, and 85 to 100, respectively.

Conclusions: ACL reconstruction and simultaneous or staged UKA is a viable treatment option for patients with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis in whom the ACL is absent. Early results of this technically demanding procedure are encouraging but longer follow-up is required.

Introduction and Aims A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a multi-centre unilateral cohort study were performed as part of the stepwise introduction of a new mobile bearing knee. The aim was to ensure that outcome for the new device was at least as good as that for an established fixed bearing device. This paper presents three year follow up of the published one year results. Instability and prevalence of “clicking” from the joint were examined in detail.

Method 1. A multi-centre RCT of patients undergoing bilateral knee replacement compared functional outcome between two different prostheses, the new mobile bearing device (TMK) and an established fixed bearing device (AGC). 2. A separate multi-centre cohort of 166 patients who had undergone a unilateral mobile bearing procedure at least six months previously was used to assess complication rate and corroborate any findings from the bilateral trial. Outcome measures included Oxford Knee Scores, American Knee Society ratings and complication rate.

Results The bilateral trial revealed no significant differences in outcome between the two devices. Revision rate for all (199) mobile bearing knees was less than 2%. The mean Oxford Knee Score for outcome for all mobile bearing knees was 37.1 ± 10.1. About 7% of patients reported instability. Clicking was more common in the TMK (48%) than in the AGC (30%) and was reported as a problem in 16% of TMK’s in the cohort study. However, clicking was unrelated to outcome score in both studies.

Conclusion At three years, the mobile bearing device was as good as the fixed bearing device. There was a relatively high prevalence of “clicking” in the TMK but the cause remains unclear. Furthermore, the symptom was not associated with poor functional outcome. The bilateral RCT and cohort study allows assessment of function and potential problems. It provides rigourous scientific justification for the introduction and early assessment of new implants.

Introduction: Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and centres involved. A multi-centre follow-up of patients is required to confirm the preliminary findings.

Aim: To examine early clinical outcome in patients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA using a multi-centre, multi-surgeon design.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in three centres with involvement of six surgeons. All patients undergoing cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS were included. 231 consecutive UKAs with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean: 2.84) were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

Results: There were 108 females and 102 males (21-bilateral) with average age of 66.8 years (42 – 86). No significant difference was noted between various age groups or between different surgeons. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for unexplained pain and one for bearing dislocation. Cumulative survival rate at 2 years was 98.6% with 93% patients having good or excellent KSS rating.

Conclusions: This multi-centre study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe and effective.

When the Oxford unicompartmental meniscal bearing arthroplasty (UCA) is used in the lateral compartment of the knee 10% of the bearings dislocate. An in-vitro cadaveric study was performed to investigate if the anatomy and joint geometry of the lateral compartment was a contributory factor in bearing dislocation. More specifically, the study investigated if the soft tissue tension of the lateral compartment, as determined by the length of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), was related to bearing dislocation. A change in length of greater than 2 mm is sufficient to allow the bearing to dislocate.

The Vicon Motion Analysis System (Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) was used to assess length changes in the LCL of seven cadaveric knees. Measurements were made of the LCL length through knee flexion and of the change in LCL length when a varus force was applied at a fixed flexion angle. Measurements were made in the normal knee and with the knee implanted with the Oxford prosthesis.

In the intact knee the mean LCL change was 5.5mm (8%) over the flexion range. After implantation with the Oxford UCA the mean change in length was only 1 mm (1%). There was a significant difference in the LCL length at 90° (p=0.03) and 135° (p=0.01) of knee flexion compared to the intact knee. When a varus force was applied the LCL length change of the intact knee (5.4 mm) was significantly different (p=0.02) to that of the knee with the prosthesis implanted (2.7 mm)

This study used a new method to dynamically measure LCL length. It found that after implantation of the Oxford lateral UCA the LCL remains isometric over the flexion range and does not slacken in flexion as it in the normal knee. This would suggest that the soft tissue tension was adequate to contain the bearing within the joint.

However, when a varus force was applied the LCL did not sufficiently resist a displacing force producing an LCL length change greater than 2 mm.

The evidence provided by this study is contradictory. The “lack of change in LCL length through flexion” suggests that the ligament remains tight through range and is unlikely to allow dislocation. However, the amount of distraction possible when an adducting moment is applied is sufficient to allow bearing dislocation. The length tension properties of the lateral structures are therefore implicated in the mechanism of dislocation.

The aim of the study was to measure in-vivo the 10-year linear and volumetric polyethylene wear of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA).

We studied six OUKA’s that had all been implanted 10 years previously. Each patient was examined in even double leg stance at a range of knee flexion angles, in a calibration cage. A stereo pair of X-ray films was acquired for each patient at 0°, 15° and 30° of flexion. The films were analysed using an RSA style calibration and a CAD model silhouette-fitting technique. The position and orientation of each femoral and tibial component was found relative to each other and the bearing position inferred. Penetration of the femoral component into the original volume of the bearing was our estimate of linear wear. The volumetric wear is calculated from the measured linear wear and the known surface area of the bearing. In addition eight control patients were examined less than 3 weeks post-operation where no wear would be expected.and 30We studied seven OUKA’s that had all been implanted at least 10 years previously. A stereo pair of X-ray films was acquired for each patient at 0 Results: The control group showed no measured wear. The seven OUKA’s had an average maximum depth of linear penetration of 0.40 mm at a mean follow-up of 10.9 years. The linear wear rate was 0.033 mm/year. The volumetric material loss was 79.8 mm3. If a steady gradual material loss is assumed, 8 mm3 of UHMWPE was lost per year.

Polyethylene particulate wear debris continues to be implicated in the aetiology of component loosening and implant failure knee following arthroplasty. The OUKA employs a spherical femoral component and a fully congruous meniscal bearing to increase contact area and theoretically reduce the potential for polyethylene wear. The results from this in-vivo study confirm that the device has low 10-year linear and volumetric wear in clinical practice. This may protect the device from component loosening in the long term.

The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be contentious. Concerns exist about implanting a UKA in younger individuals. It has been reported that it is contra-indicated in patients under the age of 60. The suggestion is that younger patients may compromise their outcome after surgery by their increased activity levels. However, the number of publications with data on UKA in young patients is minimal and the age/activity related criteria for UKA remains unknown.

The aim of the study was 1) to confirm that younger UKA patients have higher activity levels than older patients, and 2) to test the hypothesis that younger, more active patients have inferior outcome when compared to older less active patients.

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing UKA who were under 60 years (Group Y) and 50 patients over 60 years (Group O) were recruited. Indications were anteromedial arthritis with full thickness lateral compartment cartilage, a functioning ACL and a correctible varus. All patients underwent Oxford UKA using the minimally invasive technique. This device employs an unconstrained fully congruous meniscal bearing. Outcome was evaluated using Knee Society Scores. Activity level was documented using Tegner Activity Score.

Average age of patients for group Y and O was 55 and 68 years respectively. Minimum follw-up was 2 years. pre-op. knee scores were comparable for each group. (y: 38.8, O: 35.8) and patients in both groups siginificantly improved after surgery. A significant difference in Tegner score was found between the two groups after surgery (y:4.1, O:2.6). More than 50% of younger patients regularly participated in high demand activities like skiing, tennis and manual labour. No statistically significant differences in any other post op. knee scores or complication rate were found despite adequate study power.

Younger patients have increased activity levels after UKA when compared to an older age group. There is no evidence that the outcome of UKA in younger more active patients will be inferior to those who are older and more sedentary.

Introduction: The indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be contentious. Concerns exist about implanting a UKA in younger individuals and it has been reported that the procedure is contra-indicated in patients under the age of 60. The suggestion is that younger patients may compromise their outcome after surgery by their increased activity levels. However, the number of publications with data on UKA in young patients is minimal and the age/activity related criteria for UKA remains unknown.

Aim: The aim is twofold: 1) to confirm that younger UKA patients have higher activity levels than older patients, and 2) to test the hypothesis that younger, more active patients have inferior outcome when compared to older less active patients.

Materials and methods: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing UKA who were under 60 years old at the time of surgery (Group Y) and 50 patients over 60 years (Group O) were recruited. Indications were anteromedial arthritis with full thickness lateral compartment cartilage, a functioning ACL and a correctible varus deformity. All patients underwent Oxford UKA using the minimally invasive technique. This device employs an unconstrained fully congruous meniscal bearing. Outcome was evaluated using the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Activity level was documented using the established Tegner Activity Score.

Results: The average age of patients for group Y and O was 55 years and 68 years respectively. Minimum follow up for both groups was 2 years. Pre-operative AKSS scores were comparable for each group (Group Y = 38.8, Group O = 35.8) and patients in both groups significantly improved after surgery. A significant difference in Tegner score was found between groups after surgery (Group Y = 3.9, Group O = 2.6). It was found that 40% of younger patients regularly participate in high demand activities like skiing, tennis, hard manual labour and swimming. No statistically significant difference in any other post operative knee scores or complication rate were found despite adequate study power.

Conclusions: Younger patients have increased activity levels after UKA when compared to an older age group. There is no evidence that the outcome of UKA in younger more active patients will be inferior to those who are older and more sedentary.

There are now a number of controlled prospective trials comparing the advantages of unicompartmental arthroplasty versus total knee replacement (Rougraff 1991, Lawrencin 1991, Newman 1998, and Price 2000). These studies all favour unicompartmental arthroplasty over total knee replacement in terms of the following. The kinematics of uncompartmental arthroplasty are better and more normal for the surgery retains both cruciate ligaments with proprioceptive input. The range of motion tends to be greater in the unicompartmental group and the function better. This is especially true of demanding activities such as ascending and descending stairs, and has been shown using gait study analysis (O’Connor 1986).

The pain relief is as good, or better, with unicompartmental arthroplasty in these studies when compared to total knee replacement, and in particular there is “a better feel” with unicompartmental arthroplasty. The complications with the smaller procedure tend to be less frequent and severe and the recovery more rapid, with a potential benefit allowing for a lower cost.

There are however certain disadvantages encountered in using unicompartmental arthroplasty when compared to total knee replacement. In general there is a higher revision rate with the unicompartmental arthroplasty and this is particularly borne out in the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Using the strict criteria of Insal/Stern they suggest an incidence of 1:20 patients suitable for unicompartmental arthroplasty, and with such small numbers it is hardly surprising that there is a higher complication rate.

The advantages of unicompartmental arthroplasty in the young remains controversial. In particular there are few comparative studies (Broughton and Newman 1988).

In a small study from Oxford we have found that the pain relief and function in the unicompartmental arthroplasty group were substantially better with an age match comparison group using a patient based question score (The Oxford Knee Score 0–48). We sent the Oxford questionnaire to the HTO patients of the main proponent of osteotomy surgery in the UK, who has devoted a lifetime to perfecting the art of osteotomy surgery. These patients represent the “best case scenario” and his patients at five year follow up scored 27/48 on the Oxford Knee Score. Age match group of young uni-compartmental arthroplasty patients scored 38. Comparison of total knee replacement group would score 35, and it is of interest to note that those patients revised from a failed high tibial osteotomy to a total knee replacement raised their scores from 27 to 33. There are of course disadvantages comparing unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in the young. The main disadvantages that artificial material is implanted and there is the potential for infection. What remains debatable and controversial is the outcome of procedures when converting them to a total knee replacement. In terms of 10 year survivorship most of the published literature suggests that with high tibial osteotomy there is a two-thirds survivorship, one-third being converted to a total knee replacement by 10 years (range 51% to 80%) (Naudie 1999, Coventry 1993, Rudan 1991). The similar 10 year survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty in patients under 65 years is in the order of 80%. This is borne out in the Swedish Knee Registry.

In general the problem with unicompartmental arthroplasty seems to centre around a higher revision rate, and faced with this problem there are a number of solutions. One can accept this and abandon the procedure, which has happened until recently in the United States. One can suggest that a unicompartmental arthroplasty is used as a pre-knee replacement, which has been forwarded by Repicci in the States. Alternatively one can try to minimise the failure rate by employing an implant with very good wear characteristics, one can concentrate on appropriate indications and one can define an accurate reproducible technique. One can seek to achieve a survival rate that is similar to that of the best total knee replacement.

The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement was deigned first by Goodfellow and O’Connor 25 years ago. It employs a spherical femoral component articulating on a flat tibial component. There is a fully mobile bearing, which is unconstrained. This bearing is fully congruent in all positions, which minimises wear.

In two published retrieval studies (Argenson and Psychoyios) 10 year wear rate was 0.03mm per year. In those cases with no impingement the rate was 0.01mm per year. There was no correlation with thickness and we now feel comfortable advising a 3.5mm bearing for long term survivorship.

The indications for unicompartmental arthroplasty in essence centre around medial compartment osteoarthritis with a functionally intact ACL. Some superficial damage to the ligament is acceptable, but in essence the structure needs to be intact to be functioning. There needs to be a correctable varus deformity with full thickness lateral compartment articular cartilage and this is best demonstrated on stress x-ray. A fixed flexion deformity of less than 15° is usual and employing the above indications we find that a unicompartmental arthroplasty is suitable for 1:4 knees presenting with osteoarthritis.

We do not feel that the state of the patellofemoral joint is a contraindication to unicompartmental arthroplasty. We have significant evidence to corroborate this statement. In Mr Goodfellow’s published series in 1998 the state of the patellofemoral joint and the clinical results did not correlate. The study by Weale (1999) there was no progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis over 10 years. On the Swedish Registry there have been no cited revisions for progression of patellofemoral arthritis.

The age and the activity of the patient does not seem to be an obvious contraindication. In particular in the old and unfit using the minimal invasive approach there is a low morbidity, with all its attendant advantages. In the young patient (less than 50 years), the 10 year survivorship is 92% in two published series (Murray et al 1998 and Price 2000).

The published 10 year results of the designers patient (Murray et al 1998) details the follow up of 144 unicompartmental arthroplasties with a 10 year survivorship. At 10 years there were 34 knees at risk giving a 98% 10 year survivorship 95%, confidence levels 93–100%. There was one case lost to follow up giving a worse case scenario of 97%.

Of much more relevance concerns an independent series from Sweden (Svard et al 2001). These series is of 420 Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasties from a single centre performed by four surgeons. None lost to follow up. A 10+ year follow up involved 122 Oxford unis reviewed, with 92% good or excellent HSS scores.

The 15 year survivorship was 94% with confidence levels 86 to 100%, there were none lost to follow up so the 15 year worse case scenario was 94%. This is better than fixed bearing unis and as good as the best total.

The Swedish Knee Arthoplasty Register however gave a different picture, and was published in 1995 (Lewald et al), reported poor early results with no learning curve and advised that the difficult implant should not be used. We in fact have gained data from 944 rather than 699 from the register. It concluded that at these centres they had very reasonable results, but one or two centres had catastrophically poor results, in the order of 30% failure. We can only conclude that these poor results were due to inappropriate indications or technique. More recently in January 2001 Robertson et al have published an update of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register citing good to excellent results in those centres performing more than 23 Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasties a year. Good results were possible, but there is a definite learning curve.

The phase 3 tradition of the Oxford was introduced in 1998. The aim of this introduction was to make the operation simpler and more consistent. We have consistently employed a minimally invasive approach, but we have sought to keep the advantages of phase 2 Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty. In effect there has been minor modifications to the instruments with an increased range of sizes.

Our early phase 3 results, published in 1999 (Price et al) have compared the early recovery. This is the time taken to functional recovery, by which time the patient is ready for discharge. We compared the first 40 minimals with the last 20 opens and used 40 knee replacements taken as controls performed at the same time. We have shown that the minimally invasive unis recover three times faster than the totals (p< 0.001) and twice as fast as the open unis (p< 0.001).

Finally our one year follow up of the first 58 phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasties reveal increase in the mean flexion from pre-operative 123° to postoperative 135°. A high proportion of the patients gained at least 130° of flexion and 50% were 140+. A mean AKS score rose from a pre of 37 to one year of 98. The AKS function score raised from a pre 53 to one year 94, with a very high proportion of patients scoring 95+ score out of 100 on the AKS.

In summary unicompartmental arthroplasties offer many potential advantages over TKR in terms of:

- Recovery, function.

We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of two regimes of rehabilitation for knees with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD). Fifty ACLD patients were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: a programme of muscle strengthening (T) or a programme designed to enhance proprioception and improve hamstring contraction reflexes (P). An indirect measure of proprioception, the reflex hamstring contraction latency (RHCL), and a functional scoring system were used to record the status of the knee before and after the 12-week course of physiotherapy. Sagittal knee laxity was also measured. There was improvement in mean RHCL and in the mean functional score in both groups after treatment. The improvement in group P was significantly greater than that in group T. There was no significant change in joint laxity after treatment in either group. In both groups there was a positive correlation between improvement in RHCL and functional gain.

Septic arthritis has been regarded as rare in haemophiliacs, but its incidence may have increased since HIV infection has become widespread in these patients. We describe six cases treated at one haemophilia unit over a two-year period and discuss their investigation, diagnosis and treatment. Four of the patients were seropositive to anti-HIV.

Failure of conservative treatment is the usual indication for the reconstruction of a knee with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and this depends on subjective judgement. The ability of muscles to protect the subluxing joint by reflex contraction could provide an objective measurement. We have studied 30 patients with unilateral ACL deficiency by measuring the latency of reflex hamstring contraction. We found that the mean latency in the injured leg was nearly twice that in the unaffected limb (99 ms and 53 ms respectively). There was a significant correlation between the differential latency and the frequency of 'giving way' indicating that functional instability may be due, in part, to loss of proprioception. Measures of proprioception, including reflex hamstring latency, may be useful in providing an objective assessment of the efficacy of conservative treatment and the need for surgery.

We made a prospective study of 58 patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee. They were examined by magnetic resonance imaging using 3-D gradient echo intermediate-weighted studies before having an arthroscopy. The preoperative clinical assessment was found to have a diagnostic sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 43%, compared with 100% and 63% respectively for magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy confirmed the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of internal derangement but the results for articular cartilage lesions were much less good, with a sensitivity of only 18% but a specificity of 100%. Acceptance of the magnetic resonance imaging findings could have resulted in a 29% reduction in the number of arthroscopies without missing any significant meniscal lesion.

The results of 276 cemented revision total hip arthroplasties performed for aseptic failure between 1977 and 1986 have been reviewed. The mean time between revision and review was 75 months (range 30 to 144). Of 220 cases available for review, 159 were assessed clinically and radiographically, and 32 by postal questionnaire. Eighteen hips required further revision, 12 for loosening, two for sepsis, two for persistent pain, and one each for fracture and recurrent dislocation. A further six hips were radiologically and symptomatically loose. Pain was mild or absent in 83%. Over half were able to walk a mile or more; 70% flexed more than 70 degrees; 15% had a flexion deformity, but in only 7% was this more than 10 degrees. The mean Harris hip score was 74. Survival at five years was 95% and at 10 years, 77%.

The results of a study of the use of autograft versus allograft bone in the surgery of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis are presented. Two groups of patients, matched for age, sex, level and angle of curve, received bone grafts, 20 patients having autogenous bone from the iliac crest and the other 20 having donor bone from a bone bank. Both groups had otherwise identical posterior fusions and Harrington instrumentation. There was no difference between the two groups in a blind, radiographic assessment of bone graft mass at six months, nor in maintenance of the curve correction over the same period. No major operative complications nor failures of instrumentation were encountered. There was, however, a marked reduction in operative time and blood loss in the patients receiving donor bone and also a much lower incidence of late symptoms relating to the operative sites. We conclude that, even in the presence of adequate iliac crest, the use of bank bone is superior for grafting in idiopathic scoliosis surgery.