The management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus delayed anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy in such patients. 17 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12–20 months were reviewed (mean follow-up of 40 months, range 6–74). This group was compared to 15 controls who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18–23 months (mean follow-up of 44 months, range 14–134). 13 of the 17 (76%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with a further 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. Acetabular index improved from 42 (32–50, SD − 5.5) to 16 (7–24, SD − 4.5) in the MOAR group after Salter osteotomy compared to an improvement of 40 (30–53, SD − 6) to 13 (4–24, SD − 5) in the control group (p>0.05). Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 15 of 17 (88%) MAOR patients. All patients in the control group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range. There was 1 subluxation (7%) in the control group. There were 6 cases (33%) of post-operative avascular necrosis (5 Kalamchi & MacEwen Grade I, 1 Grade 2) in the MAOR group and 6 (40%) in the control group (5 Grade 1, 1 Grade 4). All of the MAOR patients had good or excellent clinical results according to McKay's criteria, compared to 14 out of 15 (93%) controls. This study suggests that MAOR or delayed open reduction and Salter osteotomy is a reasonable treatment for children with DDH presenting between the ages of 12 and 18 months. However, the majority of MAORs are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy.
The management of developmental hip dysplasia requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy (delayed until the child is of sufficient size) in such patients. 19 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12-22 months were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 1.0-6.2). This group was compared to 14 patients who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18-23 months (mean follow-up 4.1 years).Purpose of study
Patients and methods
Mean patient age at first revision was 50.8 years (range: 18.4–75.9 years), at a median of 1.8 years (25th percentile 0.03 years, 75th percentile 4.6 years) after the primary operation. 29 (35%) resurfacings were revised for aseptic loosening, 23 (27%) for periprosthetic fracture, 8 (10%) for component malalignment, 8 (10%) for pain alone, 4 (5%) for infection, 4 (5%) for avascular necrosis and 4 (5%) for instability.
We report the survival at ten years of 173 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacing’s implanted between August 1997 and August 1998 at a single institution. Failure was defined as revision of either the acetabular or femoral component for any reason during the study period. The survival at the end of ten years was 96.5% (95%c. i. 89.1 – 99.5%) The mean age of the patients at implantation was 50 years (range 15 – 75). There were 124 (72%) male cases and 49 (28%) female cases. 123 (71%) cases had the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, 9 osteonecrosis, 5 rheumatoid and 3 DDH. The posterior approach was used in 154 (89%) cases and anterolateral in 19 (11%). Cases were performed by 5 different surgeons. There were 5 revisions, 9 unrelated deaths and 18 were lost to follow-up beyond 5 years. Two revisions occurred for infection (6 months and 2 years). A revision at 3.5 years for acetabular loosening and two further at 6.4 and 7.9 years due to avascular necrosis of the femoral head and collapse were performed. No other revisions are impending. The median pre-operative oxford hip score was 61% (IQR 48–73) and the median 10 year score was 7% (IQR 0–31) for 110 completed forms. Further analysis of the total resurfacing database at this institution of 2775 cases was performed. Cox-proportional hazard analysis identified that component size and pre-operative diagnosis were significantly associated with failure. Although females may initially appear to have a greater risk of revision this is related to differences in the size and pre-operative diagnosis between the genders. This study confirms that hip resurfacing using a metal-on-metal bearing of known provenance can provide a solution in the medium term for the younger more active adult who requires surgical intervention for hip disease.
We report the results of contained bone defects after curettage of benign bone tumours of the distal radius treated without bone grafting or the use of bone substitute. 11 consecutive patients treated with follow-up of 3 to 11 years (mean 5.7 years) were studied. The mean age at diagnosis was 27 (range 11 to 55). There were7 males and 4 females. Histological diagnosis was giant cell tumour in 8 and aneurismal bone cyst in 3 patients. The mean bone defect at diagnosis was 23.7cm3 (9.2 – 68cm3). Pathological fracture was present in 5 patients prior to surgery. We observed full radiological consolidation of the defects in all the patients within 12 months of surgery. Radiologically detectable osteoarthritis was noted in 5 patients (grade 1 in two patients, grade 2 in one and grade 4 in two patients). Development of osteoarthritis was significantly related to size of the defect and involvement of the joint by the original tumour. No patient without joint involvement developed osteoarthritis. There was no relationship between pathological fracture and development of osteoarthritis. We conclude that contained bone defects in the distal radius do rapidly consolidate without the use of bone grafting or bone substitute. The bone remodels nicely over time. Development of osteoarthritis is related to the damage to the articular defect caused by the tumour.
The bone defect consolidated fully, with no talar collapse, in all 8 cases. 5 of the 8 patients had no pain and full range of movement at last follow-up. 4 patients had no evidence of osteoarthritis at last follow-up, 2 patients had OA grade 1, one had OA grade 2, and one had OA grade 3 pre-operatively which then progressed to grade 4. One patient had two episodes of local recurrence which were treated by curettage and bone grafting, then by radioablation.