Aims

To determine the role of early MRI in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures.

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone-forming lesion, characterized by its small size, its clearly demarcated outline and by the usual presence of a surrounding zone of reactive bone formation. It often poses a diagnostic challenge due to its ambiguous presentation. The aetiology of osteoid osteoma is poorly understood. The previous suggestion that osteoid osteoma was not associated with trauma or infection has been challenged by more recent literature raising the possibility that it could be a reactive or healing response or a phenomenon associated with the revascularisation process. This case report describes an unusual presentation of a post-traumatic osteoid osteoma. Two years following a diaphyseal, spiral tibial fracture treated nonoperatively, the patient developed new pain at the previous fracture site. The pain was constant, relieved by non-steroidal analgesia and not associated with systemic upset. It was initially attributed to other more likely diagnoses such as osteomyelitis and neuropathic pain. Multiple investigations and interventions were undertaken prior to the definitive diagnosis being obtained by surgical excision of the lesion and histological studies five years after the injury and three years following the initiation of the discomfort. In both English and foreign language literature there are only seven case reports that document osteoid osteoma following fracture, these are predominantly in the lower limb with no predominance to operative or nonoperative management. This case report should raise the index of clinical suspicion of osteoid osteoma occurring post fracture.

Introduction: Within a study group of 102 consecutive patients diagnosed with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus, an association with previously treated breast cancer was noted. We researched this proposed relationship.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients diagnosed histologically with chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia or humerus over a six-year period at a supra-regional bone tumour unit. We identified those patients who had previously been treated for breast cancer.

Results: There were 58 female and 44 male patients. The study group contained six females (10%, mean age 53 years) who had previously been treated for breast cancer, a higher proportion than would be expected. They were referred following identification of a solitary area of increased activity on routine screening with isotope bone scan, presumed to be a solitary bony metastasis. Most (86%) of this breast carcinoma sub-group had developed low-grade bone chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade 0.5-I) and only one case (14%) had developed high-grade chondrosarcoma (Trojani grade II–III).

Discussion: A suspicious long bone lesion on bone scan in a patient with a past medical history of breast cancer must, therefore, not be assumed to be a metastasis without further investigation; the possibility of a chondral lesion should be considered. It is important that patients receive a full multidisciplinary team investigation prior to treatment in order to obtain the correct tissue diagnosis, as the management of these conditions is often different. Our study suggests there may be a relationship between patients previously treated for breast cancer and the development of subsequent chondrosarcoma.

Introduction: Chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignant bone tumour. Distinguishing between grades is not necessarily straightforward and may alter the management of the disease. We evaluated the correlation between the pre-operative needle biopsy and excision biopsy histological grading of chondrosarcoma of the femur, tibia and humerus.

Methods: A consecutive retrospective series of 100 patients with a histological diagnosis of chondrosarcoma made at a supra-regional bone tumour unit was reviewed. Twenty-one patients were excluded because 20 had only excision biopsy, due to radiological confidence in the diagnosis, and one had only the pre-operative biopsy on record, thus this series included 79 available cases. The remaining patients underwent a pre-operative needle biopsy.

Results: In 11 instances, there was a discrepancy in histological grade. Therefore, there was an 86% (68 out of 79) accuracy rate for pre-operative histological grading of chondrosarcoma, based on needle biopsy. However, the accuracy of the diagnostic biopsy to distinguish low-grade from high-grade was 90% (71 out of 79).

Discussion: From this series we conclude that accurate image-guided biopsy is a very useful adjunct in determining histological grade of chondrosarcoma and the subsequent treatment plan. At present, a multidisciplinary approach, comprising experienced Orthopaedic Surgeons, Radiologists and Pathologists offers the most reliable means of accurately diagnosing and grading chondrosarcoma of long bones.