Introduction

Topical diclofenac has proven efficacy and safety in the management of osteoarthritic pain. Its therapeutic efficacy is dependent on its ability to deliver pharmacodynamically active concentrations to the underlying tissues in the affected joint. However, the disposition of topical diclofenac is not fully characterized, and no studies have been performed using diclofenac diethylamine 2.32% gel.

Introduction

Although we know that smoking damages health, we do not know impact of smoking on a patient's outcome following primary knee arthroplasty (KA). In the UK, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) have the authority (& funds) to commission healthcare services for their communities. Over the past decade, an increasing number of CCGs are using smoking as a contraindication for patients with end-stage symptomatic knee arthritis being referred to a specialist for due consideration of KA without any clear evidence of the associated risks & benefits.

The overall objective of this study is to compare clinical outcomes after knee arthroplasty surgery in smokers, ex-smokers & non-smokers.

Objectives

The primary stability of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) relies on interference fit (or press fit). Insufficient interference may cause implant loosening, whilst excessive interference could cause bone damage and fracture.

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal interference fit by measuring the force required to seat the tibial component of the cementless OUKR (push-in force) and the force required to remove the component (pull-out force).

Aims

To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision.

Objectives

Few studies have assessed outcomes following non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We assessed outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision.

Aims

An evidence-based radiographic Decision Aid for meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been developed and this study investigates its performance at an independent centre.

The cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement has been demonstrated to have superior fixation on radiographs and a similar early complication rate compared with the cemented version. However, a small number of cases have come to our attention where, after an apparently successful procedure, the tibial component subsides into a valgus position with an increased posterior slope, before becoming well-fixed. We present the clinical and radiological findings of these six patients and describe their natural history and the likely causes. Two underwent revision in the early post-operative period, and in four the implant stabilised and became well-fixed radiologically with a good functional outcome.

This situation appears to be avoidable by minor modifications to the operative technique, and it appears that it can be treated conservatively in most patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:345–9.

Purpose: Varus deformity after total knee replacement (TKR) is associated with poor outcome. This aim of this study was to determine whether the same is true for medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: 158 patients implanted with the Oxford UKA, using a minimally invasive approach, were studied prospectively for five years. Leg alignment was measured with a long-arm goniometer referenced from Anterior Superior Iliac Spine, centre of patella and centre of ankle. Patients were grouped according to the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Group A: > 0° varus (n=13, 8.2%); Group B: 0 to 4° valgus (n=39, 24.7%); Group C: 5–10° valgus (normal alignment, n=106, 67.12%). Comparisons were made between the three groups in terms of the absolute and the change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and AKSS over the five year period, and the presence of radiolucency.

Results: There was no significant difference in any outcome measure except for Objective-AKSS (p< 0.001). The means and standard deviations of the ΔOKS for the groups were:

24 ± 5,

The frequency of five year radiolucency for the groups A, B, and C were 42%, 35%, and 45% respectively.

Conclusion: The aim of the Oxford UKA is to restore knee kinematics and thus knee alignment to the pre-disease state. Therefore, as demonstrated by this study, about 30% of patients have varus alignment. This study also demonstrates that post-operative varus alignment does not compromise the outcome. The only score which did show worse outcome was the Objective-AKSS. This is because 10 or 20 points are deducted for varus alignment, which is not appropriate following UKA. Therefore, AKSS in its present form is not a reliable tool for assessment of UKA.

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of underhanging/overhanging tibial components on clinical outcome following the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and to identify an acceptable sizing limit.

Method: One hundred and sixty-three knees which had undergone the Phase 3 medial Oxford UKA (Biomet, Swindon) were measured. Based on five-year post-operative radiographs, they were divided into groups with tibial component underhang (n=38), none or minimal overhang of less than three millimetres (n=121), and a group with overhang equal to or in excess of three millimetres (n=13). Clinical outcome was assessed by changes in the twelve-question Oxford Knee Score (ΔOKS) and pain score (ΔPS) component (questions 1,4,5,8,9) from pre-operative assessment to five years following surgery.

Results: At five years after surgery, ΔOKS was significantly worse in the overhang group compared to both the neutral and underhang groups (p=0.015, and p=0.028 respectively). ΔPS was also shown to be significantly worse between the overhang and the neutral group (p=0.026 respectively).

Conclusion: Appropriate sizing of the tibial component is essential to optimise load bearing in total knee arthroplasty. In UKA such sizing is critical due to halving of the bony support for the tibial component and the lack of room for a large stem. Excessive undersizing of the prosthesis may lead to subsidence and loosening, whilst excessive overhanging may cause local soft tissue irritation and pain.

This study demonstrates that medial overhang of less than three millimetres for the tibial component is acceptable in the Oxford UKA. Excessive overhang equal to this or more results in significantly worse ΔOKS and ΔPS. However, no difference in the five year ΔOKS and ΔPS was demonstrated between underhang and the other two groups in this study.

Purpose: To identify associative factors for radiolucency (RL) under the tibial component following the Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA), and to evaluate its effect on clinical outcome scores.

Method: One hundred and sixty-one knees which had undergone primary Phase 3 medial Oxford UKA were included. Fluoroscopic radiography films were assessed at five years post-operatively for areas of tibial RL. The two groups of patients, with and without RL, were compared to

patients’ pre-operative demographics for age, weight, height, BMI,

Results: 101 (62%) knees were found to have tibial RL. All RL were categorised as physiological or they were < 1mm thick, with sclerotic margins and non-progressive. No statistical difference was found between knees with RL and those without, in terms of pre-operative demographics, intra- or post-operative factors, and clinical outcome scores (p> 0.1 in all variables).

Discussion: Radiolucency (RL) under the tibial component is a common finding following the Oxford UKA. Many theories have been proposed to explain the cause of RL, such as poor cementing, osteonecrosis, micromotion, and thermal necrosis. However, the true aetiology and clinical significance remain unclear. We attempted to address this.

We found no significant relationship between physiological RL, pre-operative demographics, intra-operative variables and clinical outcome scores in this study. Tibial RL remains a common finding following the Oxford UKA yet we do not know why it occurs but in the medium term, clinical outcome is not influenced by RL. In particular, it is not a sign of loosening. Physiological RL can therefore be ignored even if associated with adverse symptoms following the Oxford UKA.

It is not known whether the effect of Foot Pumps is enhanced by simultaneous use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) (by controlling calf compliance) or hindered (by restricting preload).

The peak velocity in the popliteal vein was measured in twenty volunteers with duplex ultrasound at rest with the legs flat, foot-up and foot-down; it was then measured when the AV Impulse was activated. These measurements were each performed with and without graduated compression stockings. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

In each position of the leg (flat, foot-up and foot-down), the Peak venous velocity was greater if GCS were not used in comparison with the peak velocity if stockings were used.

There was no significant difference in resting velocity with the foot flat, foot down or foot up without stockings or with stockings.

Various studies have shown the efficacy of foot pumps in reducing the incidence of DVT in patients with joint replacements and hip fractures. They do not cause soft tissue side effects and are well tolerated. The value of GCS in orthopaedic surgery is uncertain, although in other surgical specialities they seem to be effective. Stockings, by reducing the capacitance of vessels in the foot reduce the amount of blood available for expulsion by the foot pumps.

Nevertheless, our study presents physiological evidence for the hypothesis that, for optimum benefit, stockings should not be used simultaneously with Foot Pumps.