Daycase pathways which aim to discharge patients the same day following Unicompartmental Knee Replacement have been introduced in some centres, though most continue with Standard pathways. While Daycase pathways have cost savings, recovery data comparing pathways is limited. This study aims to compare patient-reported early recovery between Daycase and Standard pathways following UKR. This study was carried out in two centres that originally used the same Standard recovery pathway for UKR. In one centre, the Standard pathway was modified into a Daycase pathway. 26 Daycase-Outpatient, 11 Daycase-Inpatient, and 18 Standard patients were recruited. Patients completed the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score (OARS) and SF-36 (Acute) measure between Days 1–42.Abstract
Background
Method
This multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluated the clinical and cost effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine for pain and recovery following knee replacement. 533patients undergoing primary knee replacement were randomised to receive either liposomal bupivacaine (266mg) plus bupivacaine hydrochloride (100mg) or control (bupivacaine hydrochloride 100mg), administered at the surgical site. The co-primary outcomes were pain visual analogue score (VAS) area under the curve (AUC) 6 to 72hours and the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR-40) score at 72hours.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
This study aimed to assess the effect of PRP on knee articular cartilage content (thickness and/or volume) and establish if there is a correlation between changes in cartilage and clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review was performed following the Cochrane methodology. Studies were included if they reported on cartilage content with MRI or Ultrasound before and after the injection. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
The mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) is recommended to be performed with the leg in the hanging leg (HL) position, and the thigh placed in a stirrup. This comparative cadaveric study assesses implant positioning and intraoperative kinematics of OUKA implanted either in the HL position or in the supine leg (SL) position. A total of 16 fresh-frozen knees in eight human cadavers, without macroscopic anatomical defects, were selected. The knees from each cadaver were randomized to have the OUKA implanted in the HL or SL position.Aims
Methods
The revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in national joint registries is much higher than that of total knee replacements and that of UKR in cohort studies from multiple high-volume centres. The reasons for this are unclear but may be due to incorrect patient selection, inadequate surgical technique, and inappropriate indications for revision. Meniscal bearing UKR has well defined evidence based indications based on preoperative radiographs, the surgical technique can be assessed from post-operative radiographs and the reason for revision from pre-revision radiographs. However, for an accurate assessment aligned radiographs are required. The aim of the study was to determine why the revision rate of UKR in registries is so high by undertaking a radiographic review of revised UKR identified by the United Kingdom's (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR). A novel cross-sectional study was designed. Revised medial meniscal bearing UKR with primary operation registered with the NJR between 2006 and 2010 were identified. Participating centres from all over the country provided blinded pre-operative, post-operative, and pre-revision radiographs. Two observers reviewed the radiographs.Introduction
Methods
There is a large amount of evidence available
about the relative merits of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty
(UKA and TKA). Based on the same evidence, different people draw
different conclusions and as a result, there is great variability
in the usage of UKA. The revision rate of UKA is much higher than TKA and so some
surgeons conclude that UKA should not be performed. Other surgeons
believe that the main reason for the high revision rate is that
UKA is easy to revise and, therefore, the threshold for revision
is low. They also believe that UKA has many advantages over TKA
such as a faster recovery, lower morbidity and mortality and better
function. They therefore conclude that UKA should be undertaken
whenever appropriate. The solution to this argument is to minimise the revision rate
of UKA, thereby addressing the main disadvantage of UKA. The evidence
suggests that this will be achieved if surgeons use UKA for at least
20% of their knee arthroplasties and use implants that are appropriate
for these broad indications. Cite this article:
Traditional TKR designs exhibit abnormal and unpredictable kinematics: with posterior subluxation in extension and anterior slide with flexion. These can contribute to restricted knee flexion and reduced quadriceps efficiency. Newer designs attempt to provide “guided motion” with the aim of mimicking normal knee kinematics. The Journey (Smith & Nephew) BCS TKR incorporates both an anterior and a posterior cam/post mechanism while Triathlon PS TKR (Stryker) incorporates a posterior cam/post mechanism. This study compares the in-vivo kinematics of these two designs and compares it with normal knee. Knee kinematics of 10 patients with Journey-BCS TKR and 11 patients with Triathlon PS TKR; all with excellent clinical outcome (average age: 65) were analysed. Patients underwent fluoroscopic assessment of the knee during a step-up and deep knee bend exercise. 2D fluoroscopic images were recorded. Data was analysed for patella tendon angle (PTA) and contact points using a 3D model fitting technique. This data was compared to normal knee kinematics (n=20).Introduction
Methods
Establishing a full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment and functionally intact ACL is vital before proceeding with unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study is to assess whether MRI is a useful adjunct in predicting suitability for UKR, as compared to standard and stress radiographs. We identified 50 patients with a knee found suitable for UKR based on their standard and stress radiographs (full-thickness cartilage on lateral side). These patients underwent an additional cartilage-specific MRI scan to identify the status of ACL and the lateral compartment. The final decision regarding the suitability for UKR was based on the intra-operative observation.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
To evaluate the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection in patients who have had UKR. 43 patients scheduled to have a cemented Oxford UKR were prospectively recruited and randomised. All patients had the same initial anaesthetic regime of general anaesthesia, femoral nerve block and intra-operative intra-articular infiltration. All patients had a multi-holed epidural catheter placed intra-articularly prior to wound closure. Patients had the same operative technique, post operative rehabilitation and rescue analgesia. An independent, blinded observer recorded post-operative pain scores using a visual analogue score every 6 hours and any rescue analgesia. On the morning after surgery, 22 patients, (Group I), received 20 mls of 0.5% bupivicaine through the catheter whilst 21, (Group II), patients had 20 mls of normal saline by the same observer, after which the catheter was removed. No statistical difference was found in pain scores on the day of operation between the groups. However, patients in Group I had a significantly better pain score initially post top up and at 6 hours (2.4 (0-8) vs 5.7 (2-9), p<0.001). This cohort of patients required less rescue analgesia (p<0.001). In addition, Group I had statistically significant higher patient satisfaction outcome scores after the infiltration, (p<0.001).STUDY PURPOSES
METHOD AND RESULTS
To examine the short term patient assessed functional results of the Journey BCS ¯(Smith & Nephew) and Triathlon ¯(Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) total knee replacements when compared to the Scorpio ¯(Stryker) total knee replacement using a multi-surgeon case control design in a single centre. From September 2006 to August 2008 a total of 135 Journey and 97 Triathlon total knee replacements (TKR) were performed. 105 patients with Journey and 90 patients with Triathlon implants were available for follow-up at a minimum of 1 year, with an average of 2 years. Age and sex matched controls were obtained from our pool of patients who had had Scorpio TKR's. The same surgeons using the same approach operated on patients in both groups. All implants were posterior stabilised and all underwent patella resurfacing. All patients were seen pre-operatively and followed up post operatively in a physiotherapist led joint review clinic to assess range of motion (ROM) as well as function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS - used post operatively only).OBJECTIVE
METHODS
The results of the mobile bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in the lateral compartment have been disappointing with a five year survival of 82%. Therefore, it is recommended that mobile bearings should not be used for lateral UKR. This low survivorship is primarily due to high dislocation rate, all occurring in the first year. A detailed analysis of the causes of bearing dislocation confirmed the elevated lateral tibial joint line to be a contributory factor. A new surgical technique was therefore introduced in which care was taken neither to remove too much bone from distal femur nor to over tighten the knee and thus ensure that the tibial joint line was not elevated. Other modifications to the technique were also introduced including use of a domed tibial component. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of these iterations: the original series [series I], Series II with improved surgical technique and the domed tibial component [Series III].Introduction
Aim
Obesity has been considered a relative contra-indication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to fear of high wear rates, loosening and tibial collapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high body mass index (BMI) on ten-year survivorship and five-year functional outcome after Oxford UKA, a fully congruous mobile bearing design with large contact area and low wear rate. This prospective study examines a consecutive series of 595 knees (mean age 66 years, range: 33-88) undergoing Oxford UKA with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups; Group I (Normal body weight), BMI <25 (n=171), Group II (overweight), BMI 25- 30 (n=264), and Group III (Obese), BMI ≥30 (n=160). The survivorship and functional outcome (as assessed by change in Oxford Knee Score [DeltaOKS]) and Knee Society Score (KSS) for all three groups were compared.Introduction
Methods
Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an accepted treatment for patients with isolated medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) with a full thickness cartilage loss. The aim of this study was to determine if this recommendation was correct and if the procedure could be used for partial-thickness cartilage loss. 1053 Oxford medial UKRs were studied prospectively. The knees were divided into two groups; partial-thickness cartilage loss (PTCL) group and the full thickness-cartilage loss (FTCL) group. The primary outcome measure was the total Oxford Knee Score (OKS, 0 to 48) at the time of final follow up. The groups were also compared for the change in OKS (?OKS) and the proportion of patients that were considered to have benefited substantially from surgery (?OKS >5).INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Kozinn and Scott have made recommendations about contra-indications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). They suggest that patients younger than 60, weight > 82 kilograms, patients with exposed bone in patella-femoral compartment or patients who are physically active/perform heavy labour should not be offered a UKR. In addition, chondrocalcinosis is a contra-indication. These strict selection criteria are based on the experience with fixed bearing UKAs and are more intuitive than evidence based. The Oxford UKR has a fully congruous mobile bearing and has been shown to have minimal wear. Over the past 25 years, the Oxford Group has followed a standardised protocol for patient selection for UKR. We ignore patella-femoral joint pathology, chondrocalcinosis, patient's age, weight and activity level when deciding the suitability for UKR. Using the standardised indications, more than 1100 Oxford UKRs have been performed to date over the last 10 years. These patients are assessed pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively in a dedicated research clinic. We present the results of these consecutive cases. Patients were classified into two groups: group I (satisfy Kozinn-Scott recommendations) and group II (outside recommendations).Introduction
Methods
To assess the incidence of radiolucency in cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement at two years. Most unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) employ cement for fixation of the prosthetic components. The information in the literature about the relative merits of cemented and cementless UKR is contradictory, with some favouring cementless fixation and others favouring cemented fixation. In addition, there is concern about the radiolucency that frequently develops beneath the tibial component with cemented fixation. The exact cause of the occurrence of radiolucency is unknown but it has been hypothesised that it may suggest suboptimal fixation.Purpose of Study
Introduction
