Introduction: Operations inside the spinal canal are afflicted with a certain number of iatrogenic dural lesions. Incidence figures in the literature vary from 1 to 17% and are mainly based on retrospective studies. The Swedish Spine Register, SweSpine, provides a good possibility to study the incidence in a prospective patient material.

Patients and Methods: During 5 years more than 9 000 patients had surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis and were registered according to the protocol of the Swedish Spine Register. One year follow-up data were present for 74 % of the patients. Pre- and postoperative data are entirely based on questionnaires answered by the patient whereas surgical data are completed by the surgeon. Complication and re-operation registration is included.

Mean patient age for LDH was 45 (12–88) years, for spinal stenosis 68 (27–93) years and 56% of the disc herniation patients and 43% of the spinal stenosis patients were males. Most common level for LDH operation was L5/S1 followed by L4/L5 and for spinal stenosis L4/L5 followed by L3/L4.

The one-year result was studied.

Results: The incidence of dural lesion in lumbar disc herniation surgery was 2.7% and in spinal stenosis decompression 7.3%. The risk for dural lesion was more than doubled in patients with previous surgery which, thus, was a significant but also the only risk factor. At one year after surgery the result was similar for patients with and without dural lesion when VAS pain, ODI, SF-36 and patient graded global assessment were studied. Correlation between previous surgery and inferior outcome was seen but was not affected by the dural lesion as such. Three and 5% respectively in the groups were subjected to repeat surgery before discharge from the hospital.

The lost-to follow-up group (26%) had similar pre-operative demographics and the same incidence of dural lesion as those followed-up.

Conclusion: In a large prospectively studied material, the incidence of dural lesion in lumbar disc herniation surgery was 2.7% and in decompressive spinal stenosis surgery 7.3%. Previous surgery was a significant risk factor for dural lesion. The dural lesion as such did not negatively influence the one-year outcome.

Background: The Hansson Twin Hook (HTH) is an alternative to the sliding hip screw in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. In osteoporotic bone, biomechanical tests indicate better fixation properties of the HTH than of the lag screw. Our aim was to evaluate the technical results of the HTH in a larger series of osteoporotic patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Many surgeons were involved to assess, if the device was user-friendly.

Patients and Methods: In a prospective bicentric study, 55 surgeons used the HTH and a standard plate in 157 consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fractures, of which 83% were unstable. The mean age of the patients was 83 years. The patients were followed regularly clinically and radiographically for at least 4 months with a final control at 2 years.

Results: Technical intraoperative errors were done in 7 of the patients. The reduction of the fracture was inaccurate in these cases; hence the HTH had not been placed centrally in the femoral head. Two of the 7 intraoperative errors developed into failures of fixation (1.3%) during the 2-year period.

Interpretation: The HTH achieves adequate fixation purchase in osteoporotic bone, has a low failure rate and is easy to use.

Introduction: Although decompressive surgery of spinal stenosis is a common procedure in spine surgery, there are no studies assessing patients’ perceived health related quality of life (HRQOL) by EQ-5D. An objective was to describe status overall and by analyzing pre- and one year postoperative health related quality of life (HRQOL) by the EQ-5D instrument in patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis. This cohort was compared to a Swedish population EQ-5D survey.

Methods: Data were obtained from the National Swed-ish Registry for lumbar spine operations 2001–2002. On 230 patients (mean age 66 years, 53% females) operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis the primary outcome measures were pre- and postoperative EQ-5D data. In addition, patient and disease characteristics (pain and walking ability) were reported. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed and the relative differences pre-and postoperatively compared to a Swedish population survey were calculated.

Results: The majority of patients experienced an improved and their EQ-5D score increased from 0.36 to 0.64 one year after operation. However, they did not reach the level reported by an age- and gender matched population sample (mean difference 0.18). Woman had lower pre- and postoperatively EQ-5D scores than men. Preoperative severe pain was a significant predictor for a lower postoperative EQ-5D score. Four out of ten reported considerable improvement while a similar portion of patients (41%) with high preoperative scores were slightly improved. A third group (14%) were unchanged with low EQ-5D scores, and a few (4%) perceived a decline in their HRQOL. The mean VAS rating of leg- and back pain improved one year after operation by 28 and 29 %, respectively. The proportion of patients able to walk longer than 500 m increased from 25 % preoperatively to 65 % postoperatively.

Conclusions: Our national Swedish representatively cohort of disc herniation patients has a remarkable low EQ-5D scores preoperatively. However their HRQOL improved considerably in 80 % of the patients one year after surgery. The health related quality of life improves after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, approaching the population reference level. It is of most importance to further investigate the risk factors behind the less favourable outcomes in health related quality of live (EQ-5D score) in women.